Self-hosted console for Kafka, Redis, RabbitMQ and Apache Artemis: one permission model, production guardrails and a tamper-evident audit trail.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Logseq
seems to be a lot more popular than Thinstation.
While we know about 300 links to Logseq,
we've tracked only 7 mentions of Thinstation.
social mentions
300 vs 7
Note Taking popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 22
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Bidirectional Linking Logseq allows users to easily create bidirectional links between notes, enhancing organization and navigation through related information.
Graph View The graph view provides a visual representation of how notes are interconnected, helping users see the bigger picture of their knowledge network.
Markdown Support Logseq supports Markdown, making it easy to format notes and write in a widely-used plain text format.
Local Storage Notes are stored locally, giving users full control over their data and enhancing privacy and security.
Customizable Workflows Users can customize their workflows with plugins and templates to suit their specific needs and preferences.
Open Source Being an open-source project, Logseq invites community contributions and ensures more transparency in development and issue resolution.
Task Management Logseq integrates task management features, such as to-do lists and scheduling, directly within notes, improving productivity.
Possible disadvantages
Learning Curve New users may find Logseq's extensive features and unique workflow approach challenging to learn without dedicated time and effort.
Sync Complexity While storing notes locally is a pro for privacy, it requires additional tools or manual methods to sync notes across multiple devices.
Mobile App Limitations The mobile version of Logseq is still in development, meaning it may lack some features and fluidity found in the desktop version.
Resource Intensive Logseq can consume considerable system resources, particularly when dealing with large datasets or extensive use of graph view.
Community Dependency As an open-source project, certain features may rely on community contributions, which could lead to inconsistent updates or support.
Customization Complexity While high customization is a benefit, it can become overwhelming and complex to manage for users who prefer a more straightforward tool.
Lightweight Thinstation is a minimal and efficient operating system designed to turn PCs into thin clients. Its low resource requirements allow it to function smoothly on older hardware.
Open Source Being open source, Thinstation provides the flexibility for users to modify and customize the source code according to their needs or preferences.
Wide Protocol Support Thinstation supports a wide range of connection protocols like RDP, Citrix ICA, VMWare View, and more, making it versatile for various environments.
Centralized Management It allows centralized management of client configurations, making it easier for administrators to deploy and manage multiple thin clients.
Cost-Effective Using Thinstation can significantly reduce costs associated with hardware upgrades and licensing fees for full operating systems on client machines.
Possible disadvantages
Limited Local Capabilities As a thin client OS, Thinstation relies heavily on server infrastructure, which might not meet the needs where extensive local computing is required.
Steep Learning Curve Setting up and configuring Thinstation can be complex, particularly for users unfamiliar with Linux-based systems and thin client environments.
Dependency on Network Since Thinstation operates primarily as a thin client, a stable and fast network connection is crucial. Any network issues can significantly impact performance.
Limited Peripheral Support Thinstation may have limited support for certain peripherals, which can restrict its use in specialized applications requiring specific hardware connections.
Community Support Being a less mainstream solution, Thinstation may have a smaller community for support and troubleshooting, potentially making it harder to find help.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
Logseq
T
Thinstation
Overall verdict
Yes, Logseq is generally considered a good tool, particularly for individuals seeking a robust, free-form method of organizing notes and knowledge that goes beyond traditional hierarchical models.
Why this product is good
Logseq is a versatile tool for managing notes and knowledge using a graph-based interface similar to networked thought processing. It offers features like linked references, back-linking, and support for Markdown and org-mode, making it a valuable tool for those who value interconnected note-taking. Its open-source nature ensures constant community-driven improvements and transparency, encouraging a strong user community.
Recommended for
Students and researchers who manage a large volume of interconnected notes.
Professionals who require a flexible and dynamic knowledge management system.
Writers and content creators looking for a tool to visualize ideas and concepts.
Tech enthusiasts and developers who appreciate open-source software.
Logseq is a powerful and advanced tool for thought that has been gaining attention among note-taking enthusiasts and productivity seekers. In this article, we will provide an overview of Logseq, explore what users can...
Outliners (think Workflowy, Roam, Logseq) rely on blocks and indentation for primary connections, and references to other blocks or pages for richer links. They’re optimized for capturing quick thinking.
Refined user interface: Logseq offers a refined user interface that is easy to understand and pleasing to the eyes. On the other hand, Obsidian looks like a jumble of various UI elements which are hard to figure out...
Using Logseq[1][2] for years and quite happy with it, especially since it has apps for tablets/iPad and phones as well, while being completely FOSS. [1] https://logseq.com/ [2] https://github.com/logseq/logseq.
- Source: Hacker News
/
4 months ago
Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control.
- Source: dev.to
/
6 months ago
Forgetful gets procedural and prospective memory
I should call out another thing that convinced me was a user of forgetful (twsta) posted in the discord a skill for managing wok and todos from how they used to use Logseq.
- Source: dev.to
/
8 months ago
What about ThinStation? That can apparently bootstrap enough components to talk to Citrix, Redhat, Windows, VMWare Horizon, etc... Apparently even telnet, VMS and SSH if you're feeling really nostalgic.
Source:
over 4 years ago
Ubuntu server with Dump linux based terminals
For your old clients, I guess that ThinStation will be fine, either you're using ThinLinc or other kind of remote access. https://thinstation.github.io/thinstation/.
Source:
over 4 years ago
Low power SFF PC to use as a thin client, that has four video outputs?
Oh wow that'd be really great of you. ThinStation is what I've been looking at. But if the aren't locked down it should work.
Source:
over 4 years ago
Joplin is a free, open source note taking and to-do application, which can handle a large number of notes organised into notebooks. The notes are searchable, tagged and modified either from the applications directly or from your own text editor.
Obsidian
Notion
Joplin
Evernote
Anytype.io
Roam Research
Standard Notes
LTSP
DRBL
linuxmuster.net
Nakama
OneClickKick
JauntePE
Zentyal
