A startup from the United States.
Bidirectional Linking
Logseq allows users to easily create bidirectional links between notes, enhancing organization and navigation through related information.
Graph View
The graph view provides a visual representation of how notes are interconnected, helping users see the bigger picture of their knowledge network.
Markdown Support
Logseq supports Markdown, making it easy to format notes and write in a widely-used plain text format.
Local Storage
Notes are stored locally, giving users full control over their data and enhancing privacy and security.
Customizable Workflows
Users can customize their workflows with plugins and templates to suit their specific needs and preferences.
Open Source
Being an open-source project, Logseq invites community contributions and ensures more transparency in development and issue resolution.
Task Management
Logseq integrates task management features, such as to-do lists and scheduling, directly within notes, improving productivity.
Promote Logseq. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Yes, Logseq is generally considered a good tool, particularly for individuals seeking a robust, free-form method of organizing notes and knowledge that goes beyond traditional hierarchical models.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Logseq is good.
Check the traffic stats of Logseq on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Logseq on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Logseq's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Logseq on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Logseq on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I should call out another thing that convinced me was a user of forgetful (twsta) posted in the discord a skill for managing wok and todos from how they used to use Logseq. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
The Zettelkasten method is a knowledge management system that helps organise ideas effectively. I believe this system would work well for myself, so I have been looking at applications such a Logseq and Zettlr as a result. I am currently using a Wiki-style solution in Zim, however. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I am a fan of Logseq [0] as well, although itโs slightly different in that it is mostly for bulleted notes and not long-form prose. [0]: https://logseq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Logseq is a personal knowledge management and note-taking application. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Logseq (Markdown outliner + journal): https://logseq.com. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
What do you think of Logseq or SiYuan? Logseq[1] is also markdown based but also has a block approach. [1]: https://logseq.com/ [2]: https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan SiYuan[2] is more similar to Notion, but self-hostable. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
I have been using Logseq [1] for this. It displays all days in a list view that you can scroll down, which I prefer. [1]: https://logseq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
I don't understand the negative concerns mentioned by the author. It's quite easy to sync notes to your mobile device using a free method, or using a cloud service you might already be paying for [4]. The great thing about Obsidian is that the notes itself are just markdown files, so you can use them in any other program. This protects you as a user in case Obsidian enters a enshittification phase. A good... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Logseq Official Website A strong alternative if you love graph-based thinking. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
This idea feels a little like bullet journaling or logseq [0] to me. For what it's worth, I do this in Obsidian and clean-up my thoughts on a regular basis. It hits the right balance of minimalism and usefulness for me. 0: https://logseq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
You want to build custom tooling or workflows in Logseq but you don't know Clojure (or Datalog, whatever that is). - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I previously discussed how to apply this method using Logseq, another popular tool that has strong support for journaling. This time, we'll explore how to apply the same principles to Obsidian, another very popular note-taking app. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
1. LogSeq - Notes taking app. Notes taking is a good habit, and I was using obsidian for a very long time, and today I across a new tool named logseq. They are complimentary to each other and I will use them for journaling. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Does anyone have a "lab notebook" style of PKM in Emacs? I used to use Org-Roam in Emacs, but fell in love with Logseq [0], primarily because 1. It has a "daily journal" default workflow (though individual pages are supported) 2. The support of datalog queries 3. Templates This basically allows me to make templates for things I need (e.g. Meeting notes, etc) and to write a few key queries (that are also templated... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Logseq fully free and open-source Obsidan-like tool with fewer plugins, however, it also gives you a chance to complex everything a lot. I have been using it for less than a year, however at some point, I noticed that I'm writing longer Forms in Obsidian, and daily notes in Logseq. Why? Due Logseq design. It starts everything as a new point With -, even if it's a standard Markdown. Weโre starting everything at a... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
I would recommend https://logseq.com/ Progress on the `master` branch is a bit slow because there's a transition towards using a database instead of the filesystem https://github.com/logseq/logseq/tree/feat/db. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Unfortunately, I think it's ultimately unethical to support the normalization of closed-source text-editing software, because it sets a bad precedent for the level of trust a user should have in their computing environment. For this reason, I much prefer Logseq. https://logseq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Nice! I used https://wiki.systemcrafters.net/emacs/org-roam/ for a while but switched to LogSeq (https://logseq.com/) because org-roam was buggy. I like working with LogSeq, but even after a couple of years of using it, Iโm not convinced by the Zettelkasten method. Maybe Iโm doing it wrong! - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Sorry, but _what exactly_ ยซit seems to doยป from your point of view? My ยซsecond brainยป now is almost 300Mb of text, pictures, sound files, PDF and other stuff. As I already mentioned, it contains tables, mathematical formulae, sheet music, cross-references, code samples, UML diagrams and graphs in Graphviz format. It is versioned, indexed by local search engine, analyzed by AI assistant and shared between many... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Obsidian is great. For those looking for an open source alternative (or don't want to pay the Obsidian fees for professional usage) check out Logseq: https://logseq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Logseq has steadily emerged as a compelling player in the realm of personal knowledge management and note-taking applications. Built on the pillars of privacy, open-source ethos, and local data storage, Logseq enables users to create, organize, and share thoughts seamlessly. It offers functionalities akin to its competitors such as Obsidian.md, Roam Research, and Notion while staking a unique position with its block-based outliner structure and daily journaling capabilities.
User Feedback and Public Perception
Logseq is highly appreciated for its user-friendly and visually pleasing interface, contrasting the sometimes overwhelming UI of Obsidian. Users admire its ability to handle Markdown and Org-mode files, allowing a broad range of compatibility with other text editors. The local storage feature ensures users that their data remains private and secure, a significant concern with many cloud-based systems.
However, opinions diverge when comparing Logseq to Roam Research. While Logseq offers similar functionalities, some users perceive Roamโs interface as more polished and intuitive. Nonetheless, Logseq gains kudos for its efforts in pushing forward enhancements, such as adding a Journals page which introduces a new avenue for organizing thoughts.
Functional Flexibility and Adoption
The flexibility of Logseq in supporting datalog queries and templates expands its utility, making it a favorite among those interested in sophisticated personal knowledge management systems. This flexibility is echoed among users from technical backgrounds who value the capacity to personalize their workflows, similar to Emacs enthusiasts with Org-mode. These features allow users to execute complex queries, manage tasks dynamically, and even facilitate personalized workflows.
Many users have acknowledged the learning curve required to harness the full potential of Logseqโs features. Despite the complexity, there is a strong community-driven support system that champions best practices and shares knowledge to overcome software limitations.
Comparison and Market Positioning
In the crowded ecosystem of note-taking applications, Logseq is noted for its open-source nature, distinguishing it from proprietary solutions like Evernote and paid versions of Obsidian. This aspect appeals to technologists concerned about privacy and vendor lock-in. Logseqโs ongoing transition towards a database-centric backend from the traditional filesystem architecture indicates a commitment to handling data more robustly, albeit with some users expressing concerns about progress and potential disruptions during this transition phase.
Finally, the mention of Logseq as one of the best open-source alternatives to tools like Miro showcases its adaptability beyond traditional note-taking, suggesting its potential in broader collaborative and project management scenarios.
Conclusion
Overall, Logseq is slowly carving out a niche for individuals seeking an open-source, privacy-focused knowledge management tool. While improvements are anticipated to elevate its smoothness and polish, the community's fervor and the active development pipeline make Logseq a noteworthy consideration for anyone exploring personal knowledge management alternatives in 2024.
Do you know an article comparing Logseq to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Logseq good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Logseq here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
Loved the way of taking notes and gathering knowledge at one place
I simply can't imagine my days without Logseq nowadays. It's been an indispensable tool for me for a few years now.
Sounds interesting