Software Alternatives & Startups

Logseq VS Scraping Fish

Compare Logseq VS Scraping Fish and see what are their differences

Logseq

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Free
Scraping Fish

Scraping Fish is a super simple Web Scraping API. You send us a request - we return HTML. We use real browsers and rotating proxies underneath.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid $2 / One-off (1,000 API requests)
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Logseq should be more popular than Scraping Fish. It has been mentioned 300 times since March 2021.

social mentions
300 vs 33
Note Taking popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 61

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Logseq
Scraping Fish
Website logseq.com scrapingfish.com
Pricing
Open source Free
Paid $2 / One-off (1,000 API requests) Official pricing
Platforms —
Windows Linux Mac OSX Python JavaScript Java Node JS Ruby REST API Google Chrome Firefox Edge +9
Company Startup from the United States 2022
Listed in

About Logseq and Scraping Fish

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Logseq
Scraping Fish

No description of Logseq yet.

Scraping FishPowered by Mobile Proxies When using our API you leverage the power of the world's best proxies. Other web scraping services require you to pay much more to use proxies of such a quality. In Scraping Fish, this comes as the default - without additional configuration and included...

Read more about Scraping Fish

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Logseq 7 features
Scraping Fish 6 features
  • Bidirectional Linking
    Logseq allows users to easily create bidirectional links between notes, enhancing organization and navigation through related information.
  • Graph View
    The graph view provides a visual representation of how notes are interconnected, helping users see the bigger picture of their knowledge network.
  • Markdown Support
    Logseq supports Markdown, making it easy to format notes and write in a widely-used plain text format.
  • Local Storage
    Notes are stored locally, giving users full control over their data and enhancing privacy and security.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize their workflows with plugins and templates to suit their specific needs and preferences.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Logseq invites community contributions and ensures more transparency in development and issue resolution.
  • Task Management
    Logseq integrates task management features, such as to-do lists and scheduling, directly within notes, improving productivity.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    New users may find Logseq's extensive features and unique workflow approach challenging to learn without dedicated time and effort.
  • Sync Complexity
    While storing notes locally is a pro for privacy, it requires additional tools or manual methods to sync notes across multiple devices.
  • Mobile App Limitations
    The mobile version of Logseq is still in development, meaning it may lack some features and fluidity found in the desktop version.
  • Resource Intensive
    Logseq can consume considerable system resources, particularly when dealing with large datasets or extensive use of graph view.
  • Community Dependency
    As an open-source project, certain features may rely on community contributions, which could lead to inconsistent updates or support.
  • Customization Complexity
    While high customization is a benefit, it can become overwhelming and complex to manage for users who prefer a more straightforward tool.
  • Mobile Proxies
  • A Cluster of Real Browsers
  • JavaScript Rendering & Execution
  • Rotating Proxies
  • IPs are ethically sourced
  • Failed Requests Not Charged

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Logseq
Scraping Fish

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Logseq is generally considered a good tool, particularly for individuals seeking a robust, free-form method of organizing notes and knowledge that goes beyond traditional hierarchical models.

Why this product is good

  • Logseq is a versatile tool for managing notes and knowledge using a graph-based interface similar to networked thought processing. It offers features like linked references, back-linking, and support for Markdown and org-mode, making it a valuable tool for those who value interconnected note-taking. Its open-source nature ensures constant community-driven improvements and transparency, encouraging a strong user community.

Recommended for

  • Students and researchers who manage a large volume of interconnected notes.
  • Professionals who require a flexible and dynamic knowledge management system.
  • Writers and content creators looking for a tool to visualize ideas and concepts.
  • Tech enthusiasts and developers who appreciate open-source software.

No analysis of Scraping Fish yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Logseq 3 videos + Add
Scraping Fish 1 video + Add

Logseq - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal

More videos

  • - How I use Logseq Daily - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal
  • - Logseq Update Video - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal

100% Success Rate with This Proxy for Web Scrapers

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Logseq
Scraping Fish
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Logseq and Scraping Fish. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Logseq no reviews yet
Scraping Fish no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Scraping Fish yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Logseq 300 mentions
Scraping Fish 33 mentions
  • Note-Taking and Personal Knowledge Management
    Using Logseq[1][2] for years and quite happy with it, especially since it has apps for tablets/iPad and phones as well, while being completely FOSS. [1] https://logseq.com/ [2] https://github.com/logseq/logseq. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • AI Coding Tip 020 - Create a Second Brain
    Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Forgetful gets procedural and prospective memory
    I should call out another thing that convinced me was a user of forgetful (twsta) posted in the discord a skill for managing wok and todos from how they used to use Logseq. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

View more

  • Ask HN: What are you working on? (May 2025)
    Adding a support for direct CDP connection with our custom browsers cluster that powers our web scraping API (https://scrapingfish.com/) so that our customers can integrate it into their existing workflows. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Self-hosted, simple web browser service – send URL, get screenshots
    Happy to suggest another web scraping API alternative I rely on: https://scrapingfish.com. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Can confirm Indeed is selling user information
    > What is a good way to web scrap [sic] them Maybe using Scraping Fish [0]? Per [1], "They [scrapingfish.com] seem to handle all the more annoying parts of web scraping: bypassing anti scraping things such as rate limits and captchas."... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Logseq and Scraping Fish

When comparing Logseq and Scraping Fish, you can also consider the following products.