Notes, tasks, passwords, journal, files, calendar, contacts and bookmarks, with mood and medication tracking. Encrypted on your device. Open source, no ads, no trackers. Free forever; Pro is a one-time purchase.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Logseq
seems to be a lot more popular than Horos.
While we know about 300 links to Logseq,
we've tracked only 6 mentions of Horos.
social mentions
300 vs 6
Note Taking popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 48
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Bidirectional Linking Logseq allows users to easily create bidirectional links between notes, enhancing organization and navigation through related information.
Graph View The graph view provides a visual representation of how notes are interconnected, helping users see the bigger picture of their knowledge network.
Markdown Support Logseq supports Markdown, making it easy to format notes and write in a widely-used plain text format.
Local Storage Notes are stored locally, giving users full control over their data and enhancing privacy and security.
Customizable Workflows Users can customize their workflows with plugins and templates to suit their specific needs and preferences.
Open Source Being an open-source project, Logseq invites community contributions and ensures more transparency in development and issue resolution.
Task Management Logseq integrates task management features, such as to-do lists and scheduling, directly within notes, improving productivity.
Possible disadvantages
Learning Curve New users may find Logseq's extensive features and unique workflow approach challenging to learn without dedicated time and effort.
Sync Complexity While storing notes locally is a pro for privacy, it requires additional tools or manual methods to sync notes across multiple devices.
Mobile App Limitations The mobile version of Logseq is still in development, meaning it may lack some features and fluidity found in the desktop version.
Resource Intensive Logseq can consume considerable system resources, particularly when dealing with large datasets or extensive use of graph view.
Community Dependency As an open-source project, certain features may rely on community contributions, which could lead to inconsistent updates or support.
Customization Complexity While high customization is a benefit, it can become overwhelming and complex to manage for users who prefer a more straightforward tool.
Open Source Horos is free and open-source, allowing users to access and modify the source code for customization and integration with other systems.
Cross-Platform It is designed to work on macOS, providing a native experience for Mac users, and integrates well with the Apple ecosystem.
DICOM Support Horos supports DICOM imaging format, making it suitable for viewing and analyzing medical images from various imaging devices.
Extensive Features The software offers a wide range of features, such as 3D reconstructions, image segmentation, and measurement tools, which are essential for medical diagnostics.
Community Support Being open-source, Horos has a community of users and developers who contribute to its development, providing support and regular updates.
Possible disadvantages
MacOS Limitation Horos is specifically designed for macOS, limiting its usability for users who work on Windows or Linux operating systems.
Learning Curve Users who are not familiar with DICOM or medical imaging software might find it challenging to learn initially due to its comprehensive features.
Limited Professional Support As an open-source project, it may not offer the same level of professional support or reliability as some commercial medical imaging solutions.
Performance Concerns Depending on the system specifications and the complexity of the images being processed, some users may experience performance issues or slower image processing speeds.
Dependency on Community Updates The software largely depends on community contributions for updates and bug fixes, which may not be as frequent or regular as those from a commercial entity.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
LogseqHoros
Overall verdict
Yes, Logseq is generally considered a good tool, particularly for individuals seeking a robust, free-form method of organizing notes and knowledge that goes beyond traditional hierarchical models.
Why this product is good
Logseq is a versatile tool for managing notes and knowledge using a graph-based interface similar to networked thought processing. It offers features like linked references, back-linking, and support for Markdown and org-mode, making it a valuable tool for those who value interconnected note-taking. Its open-source nature ensures constant community-driven improvements and transparency, encouraging a strong user community.
Recommended for
Students and researchers who manage a large volume of interconnected notes.
Professionals who require a flexible and dynamic knowledge management system.
Writers and content creators looking for a tool to visualize ideas and concepts.
Tech enthusiasts and developers who appreciate open-source software.
Logseq is a powerful and advanced tool for thought that has been gaining attention among note-taking enthusiasts and productivity seekers. In this article, we will provide an overview of Logseq, explore what users can...
Outliners (think Workflowy, Roam, Logseq) rely on blocks and indentation for primary connections, and references to other blocks or pages for richer links. They’re optimized for capturing quick thinking.
Refined user interface: Logseq offers a refined user interface that is easy to understand and pleasing to the eyes. On the other hand, Obsidian looks like a jumble of various UI elements which are hard to figure out...
Using Logseq[1][2] for years and quite happy with it, especially since it has apps for tablets/iPad and phones as well, while being completely FOSS. [1] https://logseq.com/ [2] https://github.com/logseq/logseq.
- Source: Hacker News
/
4 months ago
Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control.
- Source: dev.to
/
6 months ago
Forgetful gets procedural and prospective memory
I should call out another thing that convinced me was a user of forgetful (twsta) posted in the discord a skill for managing wok and todos from how they used to use Logseq.
- Source: dev.to
/
8 months ago
2. Horos - platforms: MacOS, top 1 if you use macOS. The same user-friendly interface and very rich toolset (multiplanar reconstruction, maximum intensity projections, volume rendering. It also has tools for manipulating images and...
Source:
about 4 years ago
Lots of comments (here/elsewhere) mentioning CCW. Just had a new ceph taken. CBCT scan indicated narrow airway (<5 mm). Any casual thoughts before surgical consult next week?
Seems a little small for a CBCT... Yeah I would ask for the raw DICOM files. Should be able to open that on Mac using Horos. https://horosproject.org/.
Source:
over 4 years ago
Help! Accessing files on UDF Volume for medical results
I had an MRI done a couple of years ago, and I found some free software that works very well:
Https://horosproject.org/.
Source:
over 4 years ago
DICOM viewer. MicroDicom is a free DICOM viewer. Export to the most common picture formats, movie, clipboard. It is equipped with most common tools for manipulation of DICOM images.
Joplin is a free, open source note taking and to-do application, which can handle a large number of notes organised into notebooks. The notes are searchable, tagged and modified either from the applications directly or from your own text editor.
Obsidian
Notion
Joplin
Evernote
Anytype.io
Roam Research
Standard Notes
MicroDicom
Weasis
RadiAnt DICOM Viewer
3DimViewer
AMIDE
Starviewer
