Notes, tasks, passwords, journal, files, calendar, contacts and bookmarks, with mood and medication tracking. Encrypted on your device. Open source, no ads, no trackers. Free forever; Pro is a one-time purchase.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Logseq
seems to be a lot more popular than CrossBrowserTesting.
While we know about 300 links to Logseq,
we've tracked only 6 mentions of CrossBrowserTesting.
social mentions
300 vs 6
Note Taking popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 173
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Bidirectional Linking Logseq allows users to easily create bidirectional links between notes, enhancing organization and navigation through related information.
Graph View The graph view provides a visual representation of how notes are interconnected, helping users see the bigger picture of their knowledge network.
Markdown Support Logseq supports Markdown, making it easy to format notes and write in a widely-used plain text format.
Local Storage Notes are stored locally, giving users full control over their data and enhancing privacy and security.
Customizable Workflows Users can customize their workflows with plugins and templates to suit their specific needs and preferences.
Open Source Being an open-source project, Logseq invites community contributions and ensures more transparency in development and issue resolution.
Task Management Logseq integrates task management features, such as to-do lists and scheduling, directly within notes, improving productivity.
Possible disadvantages
Learning Curve New users may find Logseq's extensive features and unique workflow approach challenging to learn without dedicated time and effort.
Sync Complexity While storing notes locally is a pro for privacy, it requires additional tools or manual methods to sync notes across multiple devices.
Mobile App Limitations The mobile version of Logseq is still in development, meaning it may lack some features and fluidity found in the desktop version.
Resource Intensive Logseq can consume considerable system resources, particularly when dealing with large datasets or extensive use of graph view.
Community Dependency As an open-source project, certain features may rely on community contributions, which could lead to inconsistent updates or support.
Customization Complexity While high customization is a benefit, it can become overwhelming and complex to manage for users who prefer a more straightforward tool.
Wide Range of Browsers and Devices CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
Live Testing Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
Automated Testing Integration The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
Visual Testing CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
Comprehensive Reports Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
Parallel Testing The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
Easy-to-Use Interface The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.
Possible disadvantages
Cost CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
Performance Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
Limited Mobile Devices While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
Learning Curve for Advanced Features Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
Test Timeout Issues Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
LogseqCrossBrowserTesting
Overall verdict
Yes, Logseq is generally considered a good tool, particularly for individuals seeking a robust, free-form method of organizing notes and knowledge that goes beyond traditional hierarchical models.
Why this product is good
Logseq is a versatile tool for managing notes and knowledge using a graph-based interface similar to networked thought processing. It offers features like linked references, back-linking, and support for Markdown and org-mode, making it a valuable tool for those who value interconnected note-taking. Its open-source nature ensures constant community-driven improvements and transparency, encouraging a strong user community.
Recommended for
Students and researchers who manage a large volume of interconnected notes.
Professionals who require a flexible and dynamic knowledge management system.
Writers and content creators looking for a tool to visualize ideas and concepts.
Tech enthusiasts and developers who appreciate open-source software.
Overall verdict
CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.
Why this product is good
CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.
Recommended for
This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.
Logseq is a powerful and advanced tool for thought that has been gaining attention among note-taking enthusiasts and productivity seekers. In this article, we will provide an overview of Logseq, explore what users can...
Outliners (think Workflowy, Roam, Logseq) rely on blocks and indentation for primary connections, and references to other blocks or pages for richer links. They’re optimized for capturing quick thinking.
Refined user interface: Logseq offers a refined user interface that is easy to understand and pleasing to the eyes. On the other hand, Obsidian looks like a jumble of various UI elements which are hard to figure out...
Using Logseq[1][2] for years and quite happy with it, especially since it has apps for tablets/iPad and phones as well, while being completely FOSS. [1] https://logseq.com/ [2] https://github.com/logseq/logseq.
- Source: Hacker News
/
3 months ago
Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control.
- Source: dev.to
/
6 months ago
Forgetful gets procedural and prospective memory
I should call out another thing that convinced me was a user of forgetful (twsta) posted in the discord a skill for managing wok and todos from how they used to use Logseq.
- Source: dev.to
/
7 months ago
How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com.
Source:
about 4 years ago
great list of "cool" sites from hnews
Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff.
Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a...
- Source: dev.to
/
over 4 years ago
Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has...
- Source: dev.to
/
over 4 years ago
Joplin is a free, open source note taking and to-do application, which can handle a large number of notes organised into notebooks. The notes are searchable, tagged and modified either from the applications directly or from your own text editor.
Obsidian
Notion
Joplin
Evernote
Anytype.io
Roam Research
Zettlr
BrowserStack
Sauce Labs
browserling
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
Browsershots
Litmus
MultiBrowser
