Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) VS webfs

Compare LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) VS webfs and see what are their differences

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) logo LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS)

LiteSpeed Web Server Documentation - Server General

webfs logo webfs

webfs is a simple HTTP server for mostly static content.
  • LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-05-30
  • webfs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-05

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) features and specs

  • High Performance
    LiteSpeed Web Server is known for its high performance and speed, especially under high traffic conditions. It uses event-driven architecture which helps handle thousands of connections with minimal resource usage.
  • HTTP/3 Support
    LSWS offers full HTTP/3 support, which is beneficial for improved load times and performance by utilizing new protocol advantages over older versions like HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.
  • Built-in Caching
    LiteSpeed includes built-in server-side caching mechanisms such as LiteSpeed Cache, which significantly boosts loading times and reduces server load.
  • Security Features
    LSWS provides robust security features, including DDoS protection, support for mod_security rules, and features like reCAPTCHA for login pages.
  • Compatibility with Apache
    LiteSpeed is designed to be a drop-in replacement for Apache, and it is compatible with Apache configuration files (.htaccess), making migration smooth and easy.

Possible disadvantages of LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS)

  • License Cost
    Unlike some alternatives like Apache or Nginx, LiteSpeed Web Server is a paid software, which means there are licensing costs associated with its use.
  • Administration Complexity
    For those unfamiliar with it, configuring and managing LiteSpeed might present a learning curve, especially for people accustomed to using free, widely-used software like Apache.
  • Limited Open-Source Contributions
    As LiteSpeed is not open-source, it has a smaller community of developers and limited third-party contributions compared to open-source alternatives.
  • Compatibility Issues
    While LSWS is highly compatible with Apache, certain extensions or modules may not be fully supported, leading to potential compatibility issues with some applications.
  • Resource Usage
    Although LiteSpeed is optimized for high performance, it may appear to utilize more resources than needed when not configured correctly, especially in smaller or low-traffic environments.

webfs features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) and webfs)
Web Servers
62 62%
38% 38
Application Server
58 58%
42% 42
Web And Application Servers
HTTP/2 Web Server
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) and webfs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) and webfs, you can also consider the following products

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Caddy - The HTTP/2 Web Server with Automatic HTTPS

XAMPP - XAMPP is a free and open-source cross-platform web server that is primarily used when locally developing web applications.