Software Alternatives & Startups

Link Shell Extension VS Cloudfogger

Compare Link Shell Extension VS Cloudfogger and see what are their differences

Link Shell Extension

Link Shell Extension (LSE) provides for the creation of Hardlinks , Junctions , Volume Mountpoints...

Rating
0 reviews
Cloudfogger

Easy and secure encryption for the cloud. Provides security for all cloud storage services like Dropbox, OneDrive and Google Drive.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Link Shell Extension seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 8 times since March 2021.

social mentions
8 vs 0
Cloud Storage popularity
20% vs 80%
alternatives listed
51 vs 119

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Link Shell Extension
Cloudfogger
Website schinagl.priv.at cloudfogger.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Link Shell Extension 4 features
Cloudfogger 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Link Shell Extension provides an easy-to-use graphical interface for creating hard links, junctions, and symbolic links, making it accessible for users who are not comfortable using command-line tools.
  • Integration with Windows Explorer
    The tool integrates seamlessly with Windows Explorer, allowing users to create and manage links through right-click context menus, enhancing usability and efficiency.
  • Comprehensive Link Types
    It supports a wide range of link types, including hard links, junctions, and symbolic links, offering flexibility for various use cases and needs.
  • Free to Use
    Link Shell Extension is a freeware, providing an accessible option for users who need to manage links without any cost.

Possible disadvantages

  • Windows Only
    The tool is designed specifically for Windows, limiting its availability and utility to users who work across different operating systems.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    While it covers basic functionalities, some advanced features found in other professional tools are missing, which might be a limitation for power users.
  • Dependency on File System
    Link Shell Extension's functionality depends on NTFS file systems, meaning users operating under different environments might encounter compatibility issues.
  • Confusing for Beginners
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the concept of links (especially hard and symbolic links) might still be confusing for beginners who are unfamiliar with file systems and links.
  • File-Level Encryption
    Cloudfogger provides file-level encryption, ensuring that individual files are protected, regardless of where they are stored or how they are transferred.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    The service supports multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, making it versatile and accessible from a variety of devices.
  • Ease of Use
    Cloudfogger offers a user-friendly interface which simplifies the encryption process, even for users who may not be tech-savvy.
  • Compatibility with Popular Cloud Services
    The service integrates smoothly with many popular cloud storage providers such as Dropbox, Google Drive, and OneDrive, adding an extra layer of security to these services.
  • Free Basic Version
    Cloudfogger provides a free version with basic features, making encryption accessible to users who may not want to invest in a premium service.

Possible disadvantages

  • Discontinued Development
    As of my knowledge cutoff in 2021, Cloudfogger has discontinued active development and updates, which could pose security risks over time as new vulnerabilities remain unpatched.
  • No Support for Linux
    Cloudfogger does not offer a client for Linux operating systems, limiting its usability for users who rely on this OS.
  • Limited Features in Free Version
    The free version of Cloudfogger comes with limitations on advanced features, which might necessitate a premium account for full functionality.
  • Dependency on Cloudfogger’s Ecosystem
    Files that are encrypted using Cloudfogger can only be decrypted using its software, which could be a problem if the service were to shut down completely.
  • Performance Overhead
    Encrypting and decrypting files can introduce a performance overhead, potentially slowing down operations especially for large files or slower devices.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Link Shell Extension
Cloudfogger

No analysis of Link Shell Extension yet.

Overall verdict

  • Cloudfogger was a reputable option for those needing file encryption for cloud storage. However, as of now, the service has been discontinued, and its software is no longer supported or available. Therefore, while Cloudfogger was a good option in its time, it is not suitable for use today given the lack of updates and support.

Why this product is good

  • Cloudfogger was a tool used to encrypt files for cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and others. It was appreciated for its ease of use and ability to encrypt files locally before uploading, ensuring that only encrypted files were stored in the cloud. This approach provided an additional layer of security for users concerned about privacy and unauthorized access to their cloud-stored data.

Recommended for

    For those seeking active alternatives, it's recommended to look into other encryption services like Boxcryptor, Cryptomator, or services built into modern cloud storage options that provide similar encryption features. These alternatives offer up-to-date support and continued development, ensuring better security and compatibility with current systems.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Link Shell Extension 1 video + Add
Cloudfogger 1 video + Add

Link Shell Extension

TEST / REVIEW #006 - Mit Cloudfogger Dateien verschlüsseln

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Link Shell Extension
Cloudfogger
20% 20%
80% 80%
15% 15%
85% 85%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Link Shell Extension and Cloudfogger. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Link Shell Extension no reviews yet
Cloudfogger no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Link Shell Extension yet. Be the first one to post

  • 16 Tresorit Alternatives

    Cloudfogger will bring the names of Dropbox, as well as Box.net or even in terms of the OneDrive, all along with the local storage. It will be creating a virtual drive on top of your system right through which you can...

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Link Shell Extension 8 mentions
Cloudfogger 0 mentions
  • Is there a way to prevent files from being easily deleted?
    If you have games without installers you can create hardlink copies elsewhere on the same drive. It won't take any extra HD space and keeps the files safe regardless of what happens to the torrent... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Can’t launch Battlefield 4
    Linux folks are used to using symbolic links but if you're on Windows (been a while for me) you can use this to make a symbolic link to your game folder, that's what I've done in the past. Just delete the folder is assumes is your game... Source: over 3 years ago
  • One-way backup with OneDrive
    Get Link Shell Extension from here: https://schinagl.priv.at/nt/hardlinkshellext/hardlinkshellext.html . It adds context menu to right-click, where you can create various types of symbolic link/junctions. It also integrates easy... Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Cloudfogger since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Link Shell Extension and Cloudfogger

When comparing Link Shell Extension and Cloudfogger, you can also consider the following products.