lgtm.com VS GNU Make

• Automated Code Review
  LGTM.com provides automated code reviews, offering deep semantic analysis of code which helps in identifying bugs, vulnerabilities, and other issues early in the development process.
• Multi-language Support
  LGTM.com supports multiple programming languages, including Java, JavaScript, Python, C++, and C#, allowing teams with diverse codebases to use one tool for all their projects.
• Integrations
  It integrates with popular platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket, allowing seamless operation within existing workflows and continuous integration pipelines.
• Database of Queries
  Users have access to a large database of customizable queries written in QL, which helps in tailoring the analysis to fit specific needs and discovering new patterns and issues.
• Free for Open Source
  LGTM.com is free for open-source projects, making it an attractive option for many open-source communities looking to enhance their code quality without incurring costs.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve for QL
  The use of QL for customizing analyses can have a steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with this language, potentially requiring additional time and effort to master.
• Performance Overhead
  The analysis can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down builds or consuming significant computational resources, especially for large codebases.
• Limited Offline Support
  LGTM.com primarily operates as a cloud-based service, limiting offline use or self-hosted scenarios, which may be a consideration for teams with specific privacy or compliance requirements.
• Dependency on Internet Connection
  Its reliance on internet connectivity may pose an issue for developers in regions with unstable internet access, affecting productivity.
• Platform-specific Limitations
  Some functionalities might be optimized or limited based on the particular platform integration, potentially requiring different configurations for distinct environments.

• Portability
  GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
• Dependency Management
  It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
• Open Source
  Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
• Wide Adoption
  It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
• Efficiency
  GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Syntax
  The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
• Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
  While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
• Steep Learning Curve
  Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
• Debugging Difficulty
  Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
• Performance Bottlenecks
  For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

No analysis of lgtm.com yet.

• free-for.dev

  Lgtm.com — Continuous security analysis for Java, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, C#, C and C++, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

• Good code analyzer for Svelte? (like LGTM)

  I use LGTM for less code smells in my open source projects. But seems like it doesn't support Svelte. Is there any good one out there? Source: almost 5 years ago

• Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)

  Lgtm.com — Continuous security analysis for Java, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, C#, C and C++, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago

Tracking GNU Make since Mar 2021.