Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

jQuery UI VS Material Design for Bootstrap

Compare jQuery UI VS Material Design for Bootstrap and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

jQuery UI logo jQuery UI

Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

Material Design for Bootstrap logo Material Design for Bootstrap

Material Design for Bootstrap is a Bootstrap compatible theme for use in Bootstrap based application.
  • jQuery UI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17
  • Material Design for Bootstrap Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-25

jQuery UI features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    jQuery UI simplifies creating and managing complex UI components with straightforward syntax and comprehensive documentation.
  • Compatibility
    jQuery UI is highly compatible with older browsers, offering a broader range of support compared to more modern frameworks.
  • Extensibility
    jQuery UI is designed to be modular and extendable, allowing developers to use only the components they need and easily extend or theming them.
  • Rich Set of Widgets
    It comes with a variety of pre-built widgets such as datepickers, accordions, and sliders, which can save development time.
  • Animated Effects
    jQuery UI includes many built-in animation effects that can enhance the user experience without requiring additional libraries.
  • Theming
    The library provides Themeroller, a tool that allows developers to create custom themes easily, ensuring UI consistency and branding.

Possible disadvantages of jQuery UI

  • Performance
    Due to its extensive feature set, jQuery UI can be relatively heavy, which may affect performance, particularly in resource-constrained environments.
  • Not Mobile-First
    jQuery UI is not designed with mobile-first principles in mind, making it less optimal for modern responsive web applications.
  • Learning Curve
    While easy to use for simple tasks, mastering jQuery UI for more complex applications may require a significant learning curve.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Since jQuery UI relies on the jQuery library, it adds an additional dependency which can be limiting if you prefer or are required to use vanilla JS or another library.
  • Declining Popularity
    With the rise of modern frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, jQuery UI has seen a decline in popularity and community support.
  • Limited Modern Features
    Compared to contemporary UI libraries, jQuery UI lacks some of the modern features and performance optimizations found in newer libraries.

Material Design for Bootstrap features and specs

  • Aesthetic Appeal
    Material Design for Bootstrap provides a modern and visually appealing look by integrating Google's Material Design philosophy with Bootstrap components, which can enhance the user experience and make applications more attractive.
  • Familiarity
    Developers familiar with Bootstrap will find it easy to adopt Material Design for Bootstrap due to its inherent Bootstrap architecture, easing the learning curve while adding Material Design elements.
  • Responsive Design
    Material Design for Bootstrap maintains Bootstrap's robust responsive grid system, enabling designers to create mobile-friendly and adaptable web pages with Material Design aesthetics.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The framework offers extensive documentation, examples, and community support, which simplifies the development process and allows for easier troubleshooting and customization.
  • Customization
    It allows for significant customization where developers can override component styles, mix colors, and use variables to align with brand requirements while maintaining Material Design standards.

Possible disadvantages of Material Design for Bootstrap

  • Performance Overhead
    Integrating Material Design with Bootstrap can lead to additional CSS and JavaScript overhead, potentially impacting the performance of the website if not optimized.
  • Complexity
    Combining two design systems can introduce complexity, as developers may need to navigate through both Material Design principles and Bootstrap's framework, which could increase development time.
  • Inconsistencies
    There might be inconsistencies or conflicts between Material Design components and Bootstrap components, particularly when attempting customizations or using third-party plugins not designed for Material Design.
  • Dependency on Bootstrap
    For projects that do not require all the functionalities of Bootstrap, using Material Design for Bootstrap might introduce unnecessary dependencies, resulting in a heavier and bloated front-end.
  • Limited Advanced Components
    While it covers most basic components, developers looking for advanced and highly specialized elements may find Material Design for Bootstrap lacking compared to more dedicated Material Design libraries.

jQuery UI videos

jQuery UI tutorial: Adding a user interface with jQuery UI | lynda.com

More videos:

  • Review - jQuery UI Ultimate:Design Amazing Interfaces Using jQuery UI : Understanding the curriculum.

Material Design for Bootstrap videos

VueBootstrap vs Material Design For Bootstrap (WHICH ONE SHOULD I CHOOSE?)

More videos:

  • Review - Material Design for Bootstrap PRO - 5 min Quick Start

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to jQuery UI and Material Design for Bootstrap)
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using jQuery UI and Material Design for Bootstrap. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, jQuery UI seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

jQuery UI mentions (15)

  • Let Me Talk About Component-based Front-end Development
    The once popular jQuery, with its strengths fully utilized in jQuery UI and Bootstrap, provides many UI components and is also friendly to backend developers, seemingly meeting the requirements. However, looking at their component implementation and resource loading forms—. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    jQuery UI: An open-source library for building user interfaces based on jQuery. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • What is a component library and should you build your own?
    Fortunately, when I started web development in earnest, many of these issues were ironed out. By this point, there were still a handful of libraries that made writing complex interfaces with cross-browser support a little easier. Jquery UI, the first component library I used, supported accordions and other widgets. But the browser is constantly evolving, and we now have a native way of implementing this accordion... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Best ReactJS library for Drag-n-Drop Table for plugin Admin view?
    Because WordPress is already have these jQuery & jQuery UI libraries (https://jqueryui.com/). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • jQuery 3.6.2 Released
    We still use jQuery + jQuery UI on our website because it is basically battle tested through 15+ years. https://jqueryui.com/ It is easy as hell. What's there to not like? I don't care to be called names or being old fashioned. I also don't care about "right" tooling for frontend. As far it works and it is robust and it is going to be around for many years, I am fine with it. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

Material Design for Bootstrap mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Material Design for Bootstrap yet. Tracking of Material Design for Bootstrap recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing jQuery UI and Material Design for Bootstrap, you can also consider the following products

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!