Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Jami seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 15 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | jami.net | getswift.co |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | 2004 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Jami is the only software required for peer-to-peer (without a server) communication that respects the freedom and privacy of its users. https://jami.net/ Jami is the simplest and easiest way to connect with people (and devices) with instant messaging, audio, and video calls over the Internet and...
No description of GetSwift yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Jami is recommended for privacy-conscious users, tech enthusiasts who appreciate open-source software, and individuals or organizations that require secure communication channels without reliance on centralized servers.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
GetSwift is particularly recommended for small to medium-sized businesses that require a scalable delivery management solution. It can be beneficial for industries such as retail, food and beverage, logistics, and any business that relies heavily on efficient delivery operations. Organizations looking to enhance dispatching, route planning, and real-time tracking functionalities may find GetSwift a suitable option.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How can professionals communicate privately with their clients
More videos
Deploying GetSwift's Delivery Management Platform at an international partner
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Jami and GetSwift. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Unlike Skype, Jami operates on a peer-to-peer architecture, which results in enhanced privacy and reliability for the people who use it.
Jami has a professional-looking design and is available for a wide range of platforms. Unlike other Skype alternatives, calls using Jami are direct between users, so it doesn't use servers to handle calls.
We have no reviews of GetSwift yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


> I believe they have put the most love into their user interfaces out of all the chat programs I have seen Absolutely true. Telegram: Best UI. Signal: Best privacy. WhatsApp: Largest userbase. Other than the 3 big ones, I recently found... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Maybe Jami, haven't looked at it for a while: https://jami.net/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Jami (https://jami.net) is better, it's P2P and open source. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Tracking GetSwift since Mar 2021.
When comparing Jami and GetSwift, you can also consider the following products.

Secure messaging app with strong end-to-end encryption, advanced group chat privacy settings, secure video calls for teams, encrypted communication using Matrix open network. Riot.im is now Element.
Compare Element.io to Jami or GetSwift:

LogiNext Mile provides dispatch management and delivery management software which automates delivery routes optimization and resource capacity to reduce this cost.
Compare LogiNext Mile to Jami or GetSwift:

Telegram is a messaging app with a focus on speed and security. It’s superfast, simple and free.
Compare Telegram to Jami or GetSwift:

Complete transportation management system (TMS) for every business that ships freight, all...
Compare Kuebix TMS to Jami or GetSwift:

Fast, simple & secure messaging. Privacy that fits in your pocket.
Compare Signal to Jami or GetSwift:
