Jami is the only software required for peer-to-peer (without a server) communication that respects the freedom and privacy of its users. https://jami.net/
Jami is the simplest and easiest way to connect with people (and devices) with instant messaging, audio, and video calls over the Internet and LAN/WAN intranets.
Jami is a free/libre, end-to-end encrypted, and private communication platform.
Jami is an open-source software alternative that prioritizes user privacy.
Jami has a professional-looking design and is available for a wide range of platforms. Unlike the alternatives, Jami calls are directly between users, as it does not use servers to handle calls.
This gives the greatest privacy, as the distributed nature of Jami means all calls are only between participants.
One-to-one and group conversations with Jami are enhanced with instant messaging, audio and video calling, recording and sending audio and video messages, file transfers, screen sharing, and location sharing.
Jami can also function as a SIP client.
Multiple Jami extensions are available: Audio Filter, Auto Answer, Green Screen, Segmentation, Watermark, and Whisper Transcript. https://jami.net/extensions/
Jami can be easily deployed in organizations with the JAMS (Jami Account Management Server), allowing users to connect with their corporate credentials or create local accounts. JAMS allows you to manage your own Jami community while taking advantage of Jamiโs distributed network architecture. https://jami.biz/
Jami is available for GNU/Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Android TV, and web browsers, making Jami an interoperable and cross-platform communication framework.
Manage multiple SIP accounts, Jami accounts, and JAMS accounts with the Jami client installed on one or multiple devices.
Jami is free, unlimited, private, advertising-free, compatible, fast, autonomous, and anonymous.
Privacy
Jami is designed with privacy in mind, utilizing end-to-end encryption for all communications, ensuring that only the intended recipients can read the messages.
Decentralization
Unlike traditional communication platforms that rely on centralized servers, Jami uses a peer-to-peer architecture, which reduces the risk of central points of failure and data breaches.
Cost
Jami is free and open-source, which means there are no costs associated with using the service and it benefits from community-driven improvements and transparency.
Cross-Platform Support
Jami is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, allowing users to communicate seamlessly across different devices.
Feature-Rich
Jami offers a wide array of features such as voice and video calls, text messaging, and file sharing, making it a comprehensive communication tool.
Jami is considered a good choice for those prioritizing privacy and security. Its open-source nature also allows for transparency and community contributions. However, users looking for a seamless experience similar to mainstream messaging apps might encounter some usability challenges and occasional technical issues, as the decentralized network can sometimes affect performance.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Jami is good.
Check the traffic stats of Jami on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Jami on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Jami's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Jami on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Jami on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
> I believe they have put the most love into their user interfaces out of all the chat programs I have seen Absolutely true. Telegram: Best UI. Signal: Best privacy. WhatsApp: Largest userbase. Other than the 3 big ones, I recently found Jami [1] Good UI, though not as good as Telegram. Arguably better privacy than Signal - you don't even need an account if you don't want. Zero userbase. Free software. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Maybe Jami, haven't looked at it for a while: https://jami.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Jami (https://jami.net) is better, it's P2P and open source. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Jami is supposed to be encrypted, distributed, opensource, and cross platform, though I haven't personally used it: https://jami.net/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Hey, your project looks interesting, thanks for building and sharing it. One question: are you aware of Jami[1], f.k.a. Ring? If so, how does it compare to Snikket? I see that Snikket requires a server, whereas Jami is P2P. The benefit of a server is probably that messages can be stored centrally and not on each device. But I can see pros and cons of either approach. [1]: https://jami.net/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Or better use a P2P IM like Jami: https://jami.net. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
I am surprised to not see Jami ( http://jami.net ) mentioned here yet. It is a GNU project and is fully cross platform. I use it to send files and messages between my devices, as easy as Telegram or Whatsapp. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I've used Jami (https://jami.net/) since a few years and it's been my first messenger I have ever installed on any device and any OS. Source: over 2 years ago
I have good experience with https://jami.net/ ... But you have to install the software. P2P, encrypted, anonymous, on all platforms. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
You already can, apart from some DHT and bootstrapping stuff. https://tox.chat/ https://jami.net/ I tried to like Jami, but it never worked right when I tried it. I didn't find a decent Android Tox client with video call, but it should work alright for text. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Jami (version 20230424-01): Audio & Video Calls / Chat Take Control of your Communication! Source: about 3 years ago
The other option is https://jami.net/. It seems to have a phone option and could potentially replace your current system. Source: about 3 years ago
Try Jami https://jami.net/! I'm kind of blown away by how well it works! I originally tried it about a year ago, but it was kind of a pain. My issues with it were fixed when they incorporated UnifiedPush. However, since iPhone will never have something like UnifiedPush, I wouldn't recommend it for iPhone users or people with many iPhone-using friends to convert. Source: about 3 years ago
Jami.net and tox.chat sort of being the way skype originally was. Source: over 3 years ago
Jami (version 20230119-01): Secure and distributed communication platform. Source: over 3 years ago
Jami, an open-source and peer-to-peer communication platform, has been gaining attention as a viable alternative to more mainstream messaging applications such as Skype, Signal, Telegram, and WhatsApp. Known for its decentralized architecture, Jami does not rely on centralized servers for communication, distinguishing itself from many competitors. Here, we delve into the current public perception of Jami based on recent mentions and available contextual data.
Jami's core value propositions are its peer-to-peer (P2P) technology, end-to-end encryption, and cross-platform availability. Its unique design facilitates direct communication between users without the need for intermediary servers, enhancing privacy and reducing reliance on centralized data storageโa compelling feature for privacy-conscious users. Additionally, Jami's positioning as a GNU project aligns it with open-source principles, promoting transparency and community-driven development.
Jami is frequently praised for its professional design and functionality across various platforms, from mobile devices to desktop systems. Users appreciate its ability to handle audio and video calls, text messaging, and file transfers efficiently. Recent mentions highlight satisfaction with its smooth performance, especially after updates that incorporated features like UnifiedPush, which have improved user experience notably.
Many users express enthusiasm about Jami's decentralized model, comparing it favorably to other platforms that require central servers. This architecture aligns Jami with other emerging decentralized technologies such as Matrix.org and Tox, garnering appreciation from users interested in robust encryption and minimal server dependency.
Additionally, Jami's usage extends beyond personal communication, with mentions suggesting potential use in professional settings as a telephony alternative, albeit with some setup requirements.
Despite the positive feedback, there are areas of concern. Some users have reported issues with the software, primarily in its earlier iterations, where functionality was less reliable. One common hindrance is interoperability with devices like iPhones, particularly because Apple's ecosystem limits the integration of features like UnifiedPush, which could be a setback for users with mixed-device environments.
Furthermore, while the decentralized nature of Jami offers privacy advantages, it also implies certain limitations, such as message persistence and delivery reliability when devices are offline. These trade-offs between decentralization and feature availability are a critical aspect of user decision-making.
Overall, Jami presents itself as a compelling choice for users prioritizing privacy and decentralization in their communication tools. While it offers strong functionality and aligns well with open-source principles, potential adopters should weigh its current limitations in device compatibility and feature completeness against its privacy-centric architecture. Continued development and community feedback will be vital in addressing these challenges, potentially positioning Jami as a leader in the secure messaging space.
Do you know an article comparing Jami to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Jami good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Jami here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.