Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Icons8 VS react-testing-library

Compare Icons8 VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Icons8 logo Icons8

Free app for Mac & Windows already containing 39,800 icons. Allows to search and import iconsโ€ฆ

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
  • Icons8 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-03
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21

Icons8 features and specs

  • Large Collection
    Icons8 offers an extensive array of icons and illustrations, catering to a variety of themes and styles.
  • Customization
    Users can alter the design, color, and size of icons, making it versatile for different project needs.
  • Quality
    Icons8 maintains high design standards, ensuring that the icons are aesthetically pleasing and pixel-perfect.
  • Subscription Plans
    Various payment options are available, including a free tier and affordable premium plans with additional features.
  • Additional Resources
    Besides icons, Icons8 provides other resources like photos, music, and illustrations.
  • Easy Integration
    Icons can be easily integrated into various software tools like Adobe XD, Photoshop, Figma, and more.

Possible disadvantages of Icons8

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free tier has constraints on downloads and access to certain premium icons.
  • Account Requirement
    Users need to create an account to access even the free resources, which can be cumbersome.
  • Watermark
    Free downloaded icons come with a watermark, pushing users towards paid plans for unwatermarked versions.
  • Subscription Cost
    While reasonably priced, the subscription fees might still be a barrier for freelancers or small businesses with tight budgets.
  • Search Functionality
    Some users have reported that the search function could be improved for better accuracy and ease of finding specific icons.
  • License Restrictions
    Even with paid plans, certain license restrictions may apply, limiting the use in commercial projects or redistribution.

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

Analysis of Icons8

Overall verdict

  • Icons8 is considered a good platform for designers looking for a comprehensive, seamless experience. Its combination of diverse assets, ease of use, and flexible pricing options make it a popular choice among designers.

Why this product is good

  • Icons8 is widely regarded as a reliable resource due to its extensive library of high-quality icons, illustrations, and design assets that cater to a broad range of design needs. The platform offers both free and paid options, allowing users to access a variety of styles and formats. Additionally, Icons8 provides user-friendly tools and integrations that streamline the design process for professionals and novices alike.

Recommended for

    Icons8 is highly recommended for graphic designers, web developers, UI/UX designers, and any creative professionals who require access to a diverse range of design assets. It is also suitable for individuals and businesses seeking to enhance their projects with high-quality visuals.

Analysis of react-testing-library

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. Itโ€™s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

Icons8 videos

Icons8 Review

More videos:

  • Review - ICONS8 is NOT an icon's Planet Itโ€™s EVERYTHING's Planet | The A.I. Review Show | Ep 7
  • Review - Icons8 2020: Year in Review. Happy New Year, Creative People!

react-testing-library videos

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Icons8 and react-testing-library)
Web Icons
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Icons8 and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Icons8 and react-testing-library

Icons8 Reviews

10 Best Fontello Alternatives 2021
Other powerful features that you can enjoy on Icons8 include HTML embedding, icon recoloring, multiple categories, edible icons, single style, fonts generator, and support for different languages. Icons8 is also free to use anytime and from anywhere just like Fontello.

react-testing-library Reviews

We have no reviews of react-testing-library yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library should be more popular than Icons8. It has been mentiond 137 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Icons8 mentions (57)

View more

react-testing-library mentions (137)

  • Test-Driven Development for Building User Interfaces
    React Testing Libraryโ€™s core philosophy is that we should write our tests in such a way that we simulate user behavior. By testing what the user can actually do, our tests focus less on implementation details and more on the actual user interface, which leads to less brittle tests and a more reliable test suite. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Chaos-Driven Testing for Full Stack Apps: Integration Tests That Break (and Heal)
    In the main branch, we set up Vitest as the test runner and React Testing Library for rendering the component and simulating user interactions. We also set up MSW to intercept the network requests and return mock responses. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • ๐Ÿš€ 9 Libraries to Boost Your Productivity as a React Developer
    React Testing Library (RTL) provides lightweight utilities built on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, designed to promote testing through user interactions rather than component internals. Instead of working with component instances, RTL encourages querying and asserting against actual DOM nodes, just like real users would. This approach improves test reliability and pushes developers toward writing more... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Best Practices for React Applications
    Testing ensures code reliability and maintainability. Jest, Vitest and React Testing Library are standard tools for unit and integration testing. Unit tests verify individual components, while integration tests ensure features work together. For example, testing a TodoList component might involve:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Icons8 and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products

The Noun Project - Creating, Sharing and Celebrating the World's Visual Language

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

Flaticon - A database of free vector icons.

Vitest - A blazing fast unit test framework powered by Vite

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

Enzyme - Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.