Software Alternatives & Startups

Human Benchmark VS fd

Compare Human Benchmark VS fd and see what are their differences

Human Benchmark

A web game to benchmark your brains.

Rating
0 reviews
fd

A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, fd should be more popular than Human Benchmark. It has been mentioned 130 times since March 2021.

social mentions
81 vs 130
Games popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
67 vs 72

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Human Benchmark
fd
Website humanbenchmark.com github.com
Pricing —
Open source
Company — Startup from Germany
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Human Benchmark 5 features
fd 6 features
  • Cognitive Skills Assessment
    The platform offers various tests that help users evaluate their cognitive abilities such as reaction time, memory, and attention span.
  • User Engagement
    The interactive tests and immediate feedback can make learning about one’s cognitive abilities engaging and fun.
  • Benchmarking
    Users can compare their scores with global averages, providing a sense of how they stand relative to others.
  • Free Access
    Most of the tests on the platform are available at no cost, making cognitive assessments accessible to a broad audience.
  • Progress Tracking
    Users can track their progress over time, which can be helpful in identifying improvements or declines in cognitive performance.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Scientific Validation
    The tests, while engaging, may not be scientifically validated and shouldn't be used as a definitive measure of cognitive abilities.
  • Potential for Misinterpretation
    Users might misinterpret their scores without proper context, leading to incorrect conclusions about their cognitive health.
  • Lack of Comprehensive Analysis
    The platform does not provide detailed insights or professional analysis, which might limit the depth of understanding about the results.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Sharing data on a public platform might raise privacy concerns for users worried about their data being used beyond the intended scope.
  • Distraction from Genuine Improvement
    There can be too much focus on scores and competition, potentially distracting users from making genuine cognitive improvements.
  • Speed
    fd is optimized for speed and can outperform traditional tools like find due to its use of parallelism and optimized algorithms.
  • Ease of Use
    fd has a simpler and more user-friendly syntax compared to find, making it easier to learn and use.
  • Colorized Output
    fd provides colorized output by default, making it easier to differentiate between file types and enhancing readability.
  • Smart Case
    fd enables smart case detection by default, meaning searches are case-insensitive unless the pattern includes an uppercase letter.
  • Defaults to Ignoring Hidden Files
    By default, fd ignores hidden files and directories, as well as files specified in .gitignore, helping to narrow down search results to relevant files.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    fd supports multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows, making it versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on Rust
    fd requires the Rust toolchain to build, which may be inconvenient for environments where installing additional dependencies is restricted.
  • Limited to Modern Features
    fd may not support some legacy systems and older versions of operating systems, limiting its applicability in certain scenarios.
  • Not as Feature-Rich
    While fd is easier to use, it doesn't have all the advanced features and fine-grained control options that find offers.
  • Compatibility
    fd’s simplified syntax and modern features may not be directly compatible with scripts or workflows that depend on find, requiring adjustments for integration.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Human Benchmark
fd

No analysis of Human Benchmark yet.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, fd (github.com) is generally considered good, particularly for its speed, ease of use, and modern features that enhance productivity over the traditional 'find' command.

Why this product is good

  • fd is a program for users who need a fast and user-friendly alternative to the traditional 'find' command. It provides a simple syntax, speed improvements by parallelizing search processes, ignores hidden files and directories by default, and offers colorized outputs, making it more intuitive and efficient for everyday use.

Recommended for

    fd is recommended for developers, system administrators, and power users who often search through directories and require a fast, efficient tool with a shorter learning curve.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Human Benchmark 3 videos + Add
fd 3 videos + Add

Human Benchmark TEST Is INSANE!

More videos

  • - Human Benchmark review - Part 1 | Oliver Nguyen Official
  • - Human Benchmark Aim Trainer 264 ms/target

Discmania FD (Fairway Driver) Golf Disc Review

More videos

  • - Honda Civic FD | Review & Tips If you want to own one
  • - Regular Car Reviews: 1993 Mazda RX-7 FD

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Human Benchmark
fd
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Human Benchmark and fd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Human Benchmark 81 mentions
fd 130 mentions
  • Do we have good estimates for the percentiles of scores on the different tests on human benchmark?
    Earlier today I was wondering if anyone had estimated the percentiles for scores in the Verbal Memory test on humanbenchmark.com. They display a graph on the stats page, but not the corresponding percentiles for each score displayed. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Reaction times and age
    Test it out for yourself - humanbenchmark.com. Source: over 3 years ago
  • I feel like a fraud. I ranked up to DMG, always bottom frag. Rely on using cheese spots and flashbangs/util
    Just test your reaction time on humanbenchmark.com You'll be around average. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

  • I Replaced a 461-Million-Downloads-a-Month Glob Package With One Rust File
    Fast-glob was the Package Killer target, but it was not the only comparison worth making. Developers often reach for fd or ripgrep when they need to locate files from a terminal. They are mature native tools with excellent defaults, so... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • I wrote an bash enumerator because I was sick of xargs
    > Find works, but the syntax is arcane. Fd is a lifesaver: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Biff is a command line datetime Swiss army knife
    I know that if you want `fd` (https://github.com/sharkdp/fd) you need to `apt install fd-find` and which installs the binary `fdfind` (!). - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

View more

Alternatives to Human Benchmark and fd

When comparing Human Benchmark and fd, you can also consider the following products.