HTTPZ VS Submit.co

• Enhanced Security
  HTTPZ automatically upgrades HTTP requests to HTTPS, ensuring a more secure connection between the client and server, protecting sensitive data from interception.
• User Privacy
  By enforcing HTTPS connections, HTTPZ helps maintain user privacy by encrypting data in transit, making it harder for third parties to track browsing activities.
• Compatibility
  HTTPZ is designed to be compatible with various browsers and extensions, allowing seamless integration without disrupting existing workflows.
• Open Source
  As an open-source project, HTTPZ allows users to review the code, contribute to its development, and ensure transparency in its operation.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Effectiveness
  HTTPZ cannot upgrade connections for sites that do not support HTTPS, limiting its usefulness to those sites which already have secure protocols enabled.
• Potential Breakage
  Forcing HTTPS on websites that have mixed content or that are not configured properly for HTTPS might result in broken pages or functionality.
• Resource Intensive
  Using HTTPZ to force HTTPS can sometimes lead to increased latency or resource usage as sites are redirected and additional security checks are performed.
• Dependency on External Certs
  HTTPZ relies on valid, external SSL certificates. If a site's SSL certificate is expired or improperly configured, the extension may block access to the site.

• Comprehensive Database
  Submit.co offers an extensive database of outlets and platforms for startups to submit their stories, making it easier for users to find relevant media for promotion.
• User-Friendly Interface
  The platform features a clean and straightforward interface, allowing users to easily navigate and find the information they need.
• Time-Saving
  By consolidating information about numerous submission opportunities, Submit.co saves users significant time that would otherwise be spent researching these opportunities individually.
• Regular Updates
  The database is regularly updated, ensuring that users have access to the latest information and new submission opportunities as they become available.

Possible disadvantages

• Coverage Limitations
  While Submit.co provides a substantial list of outlets, it may not cover every niche or specific industry, potentially limiting opportunities for some startups.
• Potential Competition
  As the platform is accessible to many users, multiple submissions from competitors could reduce the chances of being featured in some outlets.
• Cost Considerations
  Accessing the full features and benefits of Submit.co might require a subscription, which could be a barrier for startups with limited budgets.
• Quality of Submissions
  The success of using Submit.co depends on the quality of the submissions themselves; poor submissions may not yield the desired results, regardless of the database's comprehensiveness.

Tracking HTTPZ since Mar 2021.

• A website that lists websites to submit your website to

  Fun story: I built BetaList 16 years ago which was one of the first "product discovery" platforms. Years before Product Hunt, etc. I manually reviewed every submission and unfortunately often I had to tell founders that their startup... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• 280+ Top Directories to Submit Your Startup in 2022 [Definitive List]

  First, I crawled and audited all the available data from similar lists. Startup directories, such as those found on GitHub and Submit.co websites are the few standing out in terms of quality. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

• Budget Friendly Ideas For Marketing Your Business

  Very cool. Just submitted to submit.co. Source: over 5 years ago