
hookVM
Webhook.site
ngrok
Hooklistener
Webhooks.cc
Hookmetry
RequestBin
Debug webhooks on localhost in seconds. Receive, inspect, edit, and replay webhooks directly to your localhost using a CLI and WebSockets. No tunneling hacks. Free to start.

Airtable
mlsql
SQL Chat
Fieldbook
sqlTranslate
Outerbase
TablePlus
Communicate with databases like a human

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | hookreplay.dev | friendlydata.io |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of FriendlyData yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing HookReplay.dev and FriendlyData.
HookReplay.dev's answer
Still early — just launched. Currently used by indie developers and small teams debugging Stripe and Shopify integrations. No big logos yet. Focused on building a great product first.
HookReplay.dev's answer
With ngrok, every code change means triggering another webhook. Add a log? Trigger again. Set a breakpoint? Too late, it timed out. Trigger again. With HookReplay, you trigger once. Then replay 100 times while you debug. Same webhook. Same payload. Unlimited attempts to get your code right. That's not a small difference — it's hours saved per debugging session.
HookReplay.dev's answer
Developers who integrate third-party webhooks Stripe, Shopify, GitHub, Twilio, Paddle, etc. Basically anyone who's ever clicked "Send test webhook" more times than they'd like to admit.
HookReplay.dev's answer
11pm on a Sunday. A customer's Stripe payment went through, but their subscription wasn't created. I needed to debug the webhook handler. Set up ngrok. Triggered a test payment. Added a log statement. Triggered again. Set a breakpoint — webhook timed out before I could step through. Triggered again. Changed the URL in Stripe because ngrok restarted. Triggered again. Three hours later, I found a typo in my event type check. I remember thinking: I just re-triggered the same webhook 40+ times. Why can't I just capture it once and replay it until I find the bug? That's the moment HookReplay was born. The tool I wished existed that night.
HookReplay.dev's answer
ASP.NET Core for the backend, PostgreSQL for storage, WebSockets for real-time forwarding to the CLI. The CLI is built in .NET and distributed via npm — runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux. Nothing fancy. Boring tech that works.
HookReplay.dev's answer
Three things most webhook tools don't do: 1- Replay the same webhook unlimited times 2- Edit payloads before replaying (test edge cases) 3- Keep a full history of every webhook received HookReplay does all three, plus real-time forwarding like ngrok.
Share your experience with using HookReplay.dev and FriendlyData. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
When comparing HookReplay.dev and FriendlyData, you can also consider the following products.

Receive, deliver, and debug webhooks with reliability, observability, and developer-first tooling.
Compare hookVM to HookReplay.dev or FriendlyData:

Airtable works like a spreadsheet but gives you the power of a database to organize anything. Sign up for free.
Compare Airtable to HookReplay.dev or FriendlyData:

Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.
Compare Webhook.site to HookReplay.dev or FriendlyData:

Infer SQL queries from plain-text questions and table headers.
Compare mlsql to HookReplay.dev or FriendlyData:

ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.
Compare ngrok to HookReplay.dev or FriendlyData:

Chat-based SQL Client and Editor for the next decade
Compare SQL Chat to HookReplay.dev or FriendlyData: