Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Heroku Button VS Flynn

Compare Heroku Button VS Flynn and see what are their differences

Heroku Button logo Heroku Button

One-click deploy to Heroku from git repos

Flynn logo Flynn

Run apps, databases, websites and services at scale.
  • Heroku Button Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-15
  • Flynn Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26

Heroku Button features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    The Heroku Button allows users to deploy applications to Heroku with a single click, simplifying the deployment process and making it accessible even to those with limited technical expertise.
  • Rapid Deployment
    It significantly speeds up the deployment time by automating the setup process, which is beneficial for developers looking to quickly prototype or share applications.
  • Standardization
    Using Heroku Button enforces standardized build configurations through a defined app.json file, ensuring consistency in deployments.
  • GitHub Integration
    Heroku Button can easily integrate with GitHub repositories, allowing seamless deployment of code hosted on GitHub.
  • Simple Configuration
    Through the app.json file, developers can define configuration variables, add-ons, and other settings in a straightforward manner, reducing the complexity of environment setup.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku Button

  • Limited Customization
    The Heroku Button offers limited customization options during deployment, which may not be suitable for more complex applications requiring specific configurations.
  • Dependency on App.json
    Deployment relies heavily on the app.json file. Any mistakes or omissions in this file can lead to deployment failures or misconfigurations.
  • Scalability Constraints
    The button is more suited for small to medium-sized applications; scaling larger applications may require more advanced configuration than what the Heroku Button provides.
  • Potential Over-Simplification
    While simplifying deployments, it may obscure important deployment steps and configurations that developers should handle manually, potentially leading to a lack of understanding of the deployment process.
  • Heroku Platform Dependency
    Using the Heroku Button ties the application to the Heroku platform, which may not be suitable for developers or businesses looking for platform-agnostic deployment solutions.

Flynn features and specs

  • Integrated Platform
    Flynn offers a fully integrated platform as a service (PaaS) that includes features like continuous deployment, scaling, and management of microservices, simplifying the deployment and management of applications.
  • Flexibility
    Flynn is designed to support any application, service, or database, providing developers flexibility to use the languages and frameworks they are comfortable with.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Flynn allows developers to contribute to its improvements or tailor the platform to better suit their specific needs.
  • Self-hosted
    Flynn provides users the capability to self-host their PaaS, offering more control over their infrastructure and data, which is crucial for compliance and security.
  • Scalability
    Flynn supports automatic scaling of applications, helping to efficiently manage resources and handle varying loads with ease.

Possible disadvantages of Flynn

  • Complexity
    Flynn can be complex to set up and maintain compared to other PaaS solutions, potentially requiring a higher level of expertise in managing infrastructure.
  • Smaller Community
    Flynn has a smaller user and support community compared to larger platforms such as Kubernetes, which might lead to fewer resources or third-party integrations.
  • Limited Features
    Relative to larger established platforms, Flynn might have fewer built-in features or integrations, which could limit advanced use cases or necessitate additional custom development.
  • Development Activity
    The development activity and support for Flynn may be less active or slower compared to other open-source projects, potentially leading to delays in bug fixes or new feature releases.
  • Hardware Requirements
    Running Flynn might require more substantial infrastructure and resources due to its integrated, multi-component nature, which could be costly for small teams or projects.

Analysis of Flynn

Overall verdict

  • Flynn can be a good choice for teams that value automation and need a robust platform to deploy and manage their applications efficiently. However, it may not be suitable for all use cases, especially those that require the flexibility and scalability offered by more mature PaaS solutions like Kubernetes. It fits well for small to medium-sized projects due to its ease of setup and maintenance.

Why this product is good

  • Flynn is an open-source platform as a service (PaaS) that simplifies managing, deploying, and scaling applications. It is designed to handle production-ready environments, making it a suitable option for developers looking to automate complex tasks and focus on their core applications. The system is particularly beneficial for applications that need continuous integration and deployment workflows. Flynn provides a full-stack agnostic platform, meaning it can support various types of applications and databases.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized development teams looking for an easy deployment solution.
  • Developers seeking a self-hosted PaaS that handles database and application deployments.
  • Organizations that prefer open-source solutions for their development and deployment workflows.
  • Projects that benefit from a Heroku-like experience with more control over the infrastructure.

Heroku Button videos

No Heroku Button videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Flynn videos

DOJ Dismisses Flynn? Not So Fast. (LegalEagleโ€™s Law Review)

More videos:

  • Review - FLYNN AND FRECKLES - PS4 REVIEW
  • Review - American Assassin (2017) - Movie Review (Vince Flynn Film Adaptation)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku Button and Flynn)
Developer Tools
19 19%
81% 81
Cloud Computing
16 16%
84% 84
DevOps Tools
10 10%
90% 90
Cloud Hosting
14 14%
86% 86

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku Button and Flynn. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Heroku Button and Flynn

Heroku Button Reviews

We have no reviews of Heroku Button yet.
Be the first one to post

Flynn Reviews

Heroku vs self-hosted PaaS
Flynn was very promising when it was announced but it seems like the project is not getting anywhere. The company blog has not been updated in two years and there are multiple issues on the Github page asking if the project is abandoned. People have also reported that the project is buggy and does not work as well as it was intended. Flynn was announced before the rise of...
Source: www.mskog.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flynn seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Heroku Button mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Heroku Button yet. Tracking of Heroku Button recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Flynn mentions (3)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku Button and Flynn, you can also consider the following products

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

DigitalOcean Marketplace - Discover and deploy preconfigured one-click applications

Porter - Heroku that runs in your own cloud

Dokku - Docker powered mini-Heroku in around 100 lines of Bash

1-Click Deploy - Deploy your favourite apps to cloud with one click

CapRover - Build your own PaaS in a few minutes!