Table of contents
Integrated Platform
Flynn offers a fully integrated platform as a service (PaaS) that includes features like continuous deployment, scaling, and management of microservices, simplifying the deployment and management of applications.
Flexibility
Flynn is designed to support any application, service, or database, providing developers flexibility to use the languages and frameworks they are comfortable with.
Open Source
Being open-source, Flynn allows developers to contribute to its improvements or tailor the platform to better suit their specific needs.
Self-hosted
Flynn provides users the capability to self-host their PaaS, offering more control over their infrastructure and data, which is crucial for compliance and security.
Scalability
Flynn supports automatic scaling of applications, helping to efficiently manage resources and handle varying loads with ease.
Flynn can be a good choice for teams that value automation and need a robust platform to deploy and manage their applications efficiently. However, it may not be suitable for all use cases, especially those that require the flexibility and scalability offered by more mature PaaS solutions like Kubernetes. It fits well for small to medium-sized projects due to its ease of setup and maintenance.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Flynn is good.
Check the traffic stats of Flynn on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Flynn on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Flynn's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Flynn on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Flynn on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Dokku is great, but historically it didn't really handle resilience. It looks like there's now a K3s scheduler (added earlier this year) which would mean I could have use a Kubernetes operator for a replicated database as well as have the app running on multiple boxes (in case one fails). It looks like it'll even setup K3s for you. The docs don't seem to go into it, but hopefully the ingress can also be setup on... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Considering other orchestration tools like dokku, dcos, deis, flynn, docker swarm, etc.. Kubernetes is no where near to them in terms of lines of code, on an average those tools are around 100k-200k lines of code. Source: almost 4 years ago
> we are indeed writing a new orchestration system in Go, called `flyd`. I know it's just a wild coincidence, but I couldn't help but be reminded of https://github.com/flynn/flynn. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Flynn, a project within the domains of Cloud Computing, DevOps Tools, Developer Tools, and particularly Platform as a Service (PaaS), has experienced a trajectory marked by initial promise followed by apparent stagnation. Flynn's journey and the associated public sentiment reflect its dynamic relationship with rapidly evolving technology landscapes like Kubernetes and competing PaaS solutions such as Heroku, Porter, and Dokku.
Initially, Flynn generated considerable optimism within the developer community. It was positioned as a self-hosted PaaS that promised to simplify application deployment and scaling in a manner analogous to Heroku but with the flexibility of on-premise or privately-controlled server infrastructure. This potential gained Flynn a foothold among developers looking for a self-hosted, easy-to-use PaaS solution.
Unfortunately, despite its promising start, Flynn's momentum has waned significantly, which is a concern echoed across various forums and discussion posts. The project's stagnation is highlighted by the absence of updates on the official company blog for over two years and ongoing issues reported on its GitHub repository. The lack of project progress has led to widespread speculation about whether Flynn has been abandoned, a sentiment fuelled by numerous unresolved issues and minimal community engagement in recent years.
Compounding these challenges are reports of instability and performance issues. Users have encountered bugs, leading to the perception that Flynn does not consistently deliver on its initial aims. When placed alongside resilient and actively-maintained competitors such as Kubernetes and Dokku, Flynn's deficiencies in terms of robustness and operational reliability have been starkly apparent.
Flynn's fall from favor can also be attributed in part to the rise of more powerful and flexible orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. While Kubernetes is notably more complex, requiring significant lines of code compared to other orchestration tools like Deis, Docker Swarm, and Flynn itself, its rapid adoption and ongoing development reflect its superior capabilities in managing complex, distributed application workloads.
The shifting community sentiment is further evidenced by reflective nostalgia from users who have moved on to alternative platforms. For instance, a user expressing satisfaction with Dokku's progress mentioned a sense of disappointment over Flynn's decline. This indicates a lingering fondness for Flynn's initial ambitions and capabilities, even as users transition to more actively-supported solutions.
In summary, while Flynn offered significant initial promise as a self-hosted PaaS solution, its prolonged project dormancy, compounded by technical issues and the rising prominence of competitors, has led to a decline in public confidence and enthusiasm. Developers seeking reliable, actively-maintained tools have increasingly gravitated towards more vibrant platforms, often citing Flynn as a once-promising project that failed to adapt to the rapidly advancing technological landscape.
Do you know an article comparing Flynn to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Flynn good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Flynn here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
