Haskell VS Pharo

• Pure Functional Programming
  Haskell emphasizes pure functional programming, meaning functions have no side effects. This leads to code that is easier to understand, test, and maintain.
• Strong Type System
  Haskell's type system is strong and expressive, allowing developers to catch many errors at compile time. This results in more reliable code.
• Lazy Evaluation
  Haskell uses lazy evaluation by default, which can lead to performance improvements by avoiding unnecessary computations and enabling the creation of infinite data structures.
• Immutability
  In Haskell, data is immutable by default. This leads to simpler reasoning about code behavior and reduces bugs related to mutable state.
• High-Level Abstractions
  Haskell provides powerful abstractions like monads, functors, and applicative functors, which can lead to more concise and expressive code.
• Concurrency
  Haskell has excellent support for concurrency and parallelism through its lightweight threading model and software transactional memory, making it suitable for concurrent applications.
• Community and Libraries
  Haskell has a dedicated community and a rich set of libraries and tools, which can help accelerate development and provide solutions to common problems.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  Haskell has a steep learning curve, particularly for developers who are new to functional programming or coming from imperative and object-oriented backgrounds.
• Performance Concerns
  While Haskell can be efficient, its performance can sometimes lag behind other languages like C++ or Rust for certain use cases, especially those requiring low-level optimization.
• Limited Industry Adoption
  Haskell is not as widely adopted in industry compared to languages like Java, Python, or JavaScript, which can limit job opportunities and community size.
• Compilation Times
  Haskell's compilation times can be long, especially for large projects, which can slow down the development process.
• Tooling and IDE Support
  While improving, the tooling and IDE support for Haskell is not as mature as for some other popular languages, potentially affecting developer productivity.
• Complexity of Advanced Features
  Some of Haskell's advanced features, such as monads and type-level programming, can be complex and difficult to master, which can be a barrier for new developers.
• Library Gaps
  Although Haskell has many libraries, there might be gaps or less mature libraries for some specific use cases compared to more mainstream languages.

• Integrated Development Environment
  Pharo offers a highly integrated development environment with powerful tools like the inspector, debugger, and playgrounds, enhancing the overall development experience.
• Live Code Changes
  Pharo supports live coding, allowing developers to make changes and see the effects immediately without the need to stop and restart the application.
• Rich Libraries
  Pharo comes with a comprehensive set of libraries and frameworks, reducing the need to search for external dependencies and allowing for rapid development.
• Object-Oriented Language
  Pharo is a true object-oriented language, which makes it natural for modeling real-world scenarios and leveraging the power of polymorphism and inheritance.
• Community and Support
  Pharo has an active and supportive community that contributes to continuous improvements, tutorials, documentation, and libraries.

Possible disadvantages

• Niche Ecosystem
  Pharo's ecosystem is relatively small compared to more mainstream programming languages, which might make it harder to find libraries, tools, and examples for specific needs.
• Learning Curve
  Pharo can have a steep learning curve, especially for developers not familiar with Smalltalk or the unique aspects of its environment.
• Limited Job Market
  Compared to more popular languages like JavaScript or Python, the job market for Pharo developers is limited, potentially making it less attractive for career-oriented developers.
• Performance Constraints
  While suitable for many kinds of applications, Pharo’s performance might not be on par with languages specifically optimized for high-performance computing or low-level system programming.
• Documentation
  Although improving, Pharo's documentation may not be as extensive or as easy to navigate as that of more widely-used programming languages, which can be challenging for new users.

Functional Programming & Haskell - Computerphile

More videos

Black Ops 3 In Depth: Pharo Burst Fire SMG Review (Best SMG?)

• Is there a programming language that will blow my mind?

  Haskell - a general-purpose functional language with many unique properties (purely functional, lazy, expressive types, STM, etc). You mentioned you dabbled in Haskell, why not try it again? (I've written about 7 things I learned from... Source: over 3 years ago

• Where to go from here?

  Where you go is entirely up to you. According to haskell.org, Haskell jobs are a-plenty. sigh. Source: over 3 years ago

• Haskell.org now has "Get Started" page!

  Should they be part of haskell.org or something else? Source: over 3 years ago

View more

• Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

  If someone wants to try it out, both Glamorous Toolkit and plain Pharo have tooling that allows integration of both local and remote LLM services. Some links to start off with: https://gtoolkit.com/ https://github.com/feenkcom/gt4llm... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Pharos: The Lighthouse at Alexandria

  Not to be confused with Pharo, the immersive programming experience: https://pharo.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Étoilé – desktop built on GNUStep

  Are you using Pharo already? If not, give it a go: https://pharo.org/ For taking notes and stuff you'd otherwise do in Jupyter or Livebook, try GT: https://gtoolkit.com/ It's not an OS, but you can just abstract over OS actions within... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

View more