Haskell VS EJS

• Pure Functional Programming
  Haskell emphasizes pure functional programming, meaning functions have no side effects. This leads to code that is easier to understand, test, and maintain.
• Strong Type System
  Haskell's type system is strong and expressive, allowing developers to catch many errors at compile time. This results in more reliable code.
• Lazy Evaluation
  Haskell uses lazy evaluation by default, which can lead to performance improvements by avoiding unnecessary computations and enabling the creation of infinite data structures.
• Immutability
  In Haskell, data is immutable by default. This leads to simpler reasoning about code behavior and reduces bugs related to mutable state.
• High-Level Abstractions
  Haskell provides powerful abstractions like monads, functors, and applicative functors, which can lead to more concise and expressive code.
• Concurrency
  Haskell has excellent support for concurrency and parallelism through its lightweight threading model and software transactional memory, making it suitable for concurrent applications.
• Community and Libraries
  Haskell has a dedicated community and a rich set of libraries and tools, which can help accelerate development and provide solutions to common problems.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  Haskell has a steep learning curve, particularly for developers who are new to functional programming or coming from imperative and object-oriented backgrounds.
• Performance Concerns
  While Haskell can be efficient, its performance can sometimes lag behind other languages like C++ or Rust for certain use cases, especially those requiring low-level optimization.
• Limited Industry Adoption
  Haskell is not as widely adopted in industry compared to languages like Java, Python, or JavaScript, which can limit job opportunities and community size.
• Compilation Times
  Haskell's compilation times can be long, especially for large projects, which can slow down the development process.
• Tooling and IDE Support
  While improving, the tooling and IDE support for Haskell is not as mature as for some other popular languages, potentially affecting developer productivity.
• Complexity of Advanced Features
  Some of Haskell's advanced features, such as monads and type-level programming, can be complex and difficult to master, which can be a barrier for new developers.
• Library Gaps
  Although Haskell has many libraries, there might be gaps or less mature libraries for some specific use cases compared to more mainstream languages.

• Simplicity
  EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
• JavaScript Integration
  Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
• Lightweight
  EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
• Flexibility
  Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
• Partial Templates
  Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
• Server-Side Rendering
  Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Functionality
  Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
• Debugging
  Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
• Maintenance
  Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
• Performance Overhead
  For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
• Community and Support
  While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

Functional Programming & Haskell - Computerphile

More videos

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos

• Is there a programming language that will blow my mind?

  Haskell - a general-purpose functional language with many unique properties (purely functional, lazy, expressive types, STM, etc). You mentioned you dabbled in Haskell, why not try it again? (I've written about 7 things I learned from... Source: over 3 years ago

• Where to go from here?

  Where you go is entirely up to you. According to haskell.org, Haskell jobs are a-plenty. sigh. Source: over 3 years ago

• Haskell.org now has "Get Started" page!

  Should they be part of haskell.org or something else? Source: over 3 years ago

View more

• Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?

  Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Chapter 7: HTML part two

  For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition

  Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more