Software Alternatives & Startups

hashdeep VS Restic

Compare hashdeep VS Restic and see what are their differences

hashdeep

Cross-platform tools to computer hashes, or message digests, for any number of files while...

Rating
0 reviews
Restic

Easy: Doing backups should be a frictionless process, otherwise you are tempted to skip it.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Restic seems to be a lot more popular than hashdeep. While we know about 194 links to Restic, we've tracked only 6 mentions of hashdeep.

social mentions
6 vs 194
Cloud Storage popularity
11% vs 89%
alternatives listed
35 vs 178

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

hashdeep
Restic
Website github.com restic.net
Pricing —
Open source
Company — Startup from Germany
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

hashdeep 5 features
Restic 7 features
  • Cross-platform compatibility
    Hashdeep is compatible with various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it a flexible tool for users across different platforms.
  • Recursive directory scanning
    Hashdeep can recursively scan directories, allowing for a comprehensive verification of file integrity across complex file hierarchies.
  • Supports multiple hash algorithms
    The tool supports a variety of hash algorithms such as MD5, SHA-1, and SHA-256, providing users with options based on their security and speed requirements.
  • Audit and verify mode
    Hashdeep can perform audit and verify operations, allowing users to check file integrity against known hash values, enhancing data security.
  • Comparison capabilities
    It offers features for comparing hash lists, useful for finding discrepancies and verifying data between different systems or backups.

Possible disadvantages

  • Command-line interface
    Hashdeep operates entirely through a command-line interface, which may be intimidating or inconvenient for users who prefer graphical user interfaces.
  • Performance with large datasets
    While efficient, hashdeep can exhibit performance slowdowns when dealing with extraordinarily large datasets, impacting speed and resource usage.
  • Limited documentation
    The documentation available for hashdeep might not be comprehensive enough for all users, especially those new to command-line tools, leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • No native support for parallel processing
    Hashdeep does not natively support parallel processing, which can hinder performance on modern multi-core processors when hashing numerous files.
  • Deduplication
    Restic has built-in deduplication, which ensures that only unique data is stored, reducing backup size and saving storage space.
  • Encryption
    Restic provides top-notch encryption (AES-256 and RSA-4096 by default), ensuring data security during storage and transfer.
  • Cross-platform
    Restic is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, providing flexibility and ease of use across different environments.
  • Efficient Backups
    Restic performs incremental backups, ensuring that only changes made since the last backup are saved, which makes the process faster and conserves bandwidth.
  • Simplicity
    Restic is designed to be easy to use with a straightforward command-line interface, reducing the learning curve for new users.
  • Multiple Storage Backends
    Restic supports a variety of storage backends, including local disk, SFTP, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Microsoft Azure, providing versatility and options for users.
  • Open Source
    Restic is open-source, allowing users to review the source code, contribute to the project, and avoid vendor lock-in.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Graphical User Interface (GUI)
    Restic primarily relies on a command-line interface. Users who prefer a GUI may find it less accessible or user-friendly.
  • No Granular Scheduling
    Restic does not have built-in scheduling capabilities, requiring users to set up their own cron jobs or use third-party scheduling tools for automated backups.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with command-line tools may find Restic's interface challenging to learn and use effectively.
  • Limited Restore Features
    While Restic is excellent at creating backups, it has fewer options for granular or flexible restore operations compared to some competitors.
  • Performance Issues on Large Repositories
    Although efficient, Restic can experience performance degradation when handling very large repositories, potentially slowing down backup and restore operations.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

hashdeep
Restic

No analysis of hashdeep yet.

Overall verdict

  • Restic is considered a good choice for individuals or organizations seeking secure and efficient backup solutions. Its performance, combined with strong encryption and cross-platform support, makes it a reliable option. However, like any tool, it depends on user needs and specific backup requirements. Some users may find that advanced configurations require more manual setup compared to more commercial solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Restic is a free and open-source backup software that is appreciated for its simplicity, security, and cross-platform capability. It's designed with a focus on being easy to use, while providing fast and secure backups. One of its key features is encryption, ensuring that all the data is encrypted at rest and in transit. Additionally, it supports deduplication, which helps in minimizing storage space usage efficiently. Restic also offers support for multiple storage backends, including local disks, SFTP servers, major cloud providers, and more.

Recommended for

  • Individuals looking for a simple and secure backup solution
  • Small to medium-sized businesses needing cross-platform backup options
  • IT professionals who prefer open-source software
  • Users who require data deduplication to save on storage costs
  • Developers and system administrators who prefer command-line tools

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

hashdeep 0 videos + Add
Restic 2 videos + Add

No hashdeep videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Making Backups From The Linux Command Line: Restic Review

More videos

  • - Using Restic for backups - Quick and Easy

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
hashdeep
Restic
11% 11%
89% 89%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using hashdeep and Restic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

hashdeep no reviews yet
Restic no reviews yet

We have no reviews of hashdeep yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

hashdeep 6 mentions
Restic 194 mentions
  • I have 2 copies of the same data in separate HDDs. Which copy should I use to create the 3rd one?
    Otherwise check out Hashdeep: https://github.com/jessek/hashdeep/. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • DS 415 play in 2022
    I use hashdeep. You have to install ipkgui on Synology and then md5deep through that which includes hashdeep (or just use md5deep). You can read up on hashdeep/md5deep here in the docs folder: https://github.com/jessek/hashdeep/. Source: over 4 years ago
  • How do I manage years of data?
    Started to be able to bring some order after I discovered hashdeep. Basically I started from a reasonably clean disk with folders to sort files, created lists of hashes using hashdeep, then used it to scan all my existing disks for... Source: over 4 years ago

View more

  • Backups Aren't Simple
    So is apparently making readable site. Software like https://restic.net/ does a good job. Few choices of backend Accepts stuff from pipe too so you can just pipe mysqldump or pg_dumpall without intermediate files Very decent options for... - Source: Hacker News / 28 days ago
  • Minimal Homelab Server with Alpine Linux
    I use Backrest, a web UI for Restic, to back up to Backblaze B2. Everything runs in Docker. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • The 3-2-1 Backup Setup for Self-Hosters: restic + Backblaze B2
    In this guide I'll set up the backup system I actually run: restic pushing encrypted snapshots to Backblaze B2, automated on a timer, monitored, and — the part everyone skips — verified with a real restore. It works the same on a €5 VPS... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

View more

Alternatives to hashdeep and Restic

When comparing hashdeep and Restic, you can also consider the following products.