Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Groupthink VS Tape

Compare Groupthink VS Tape and see what are their differences

Groupthink logo Groupthink

Automatic meeting agenda & notes, shared instantly

Tape logo Tape

Easy, collaborative social video app
  • Groupthink Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-31
  • Tape Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-01

Groupthink features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Tape features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Tape provides a minimal and straightforward API that makes it easy to write and read tests without a lot of boilerplate.
  • No Globals
    Tape does not introduce any global variables into the test environment, which helps avoid potential conflicts and promotes a cleaner test setup.
  • Node.js Compatibility
    As a testing tool primarily designed for Node.js, Tape integrates seamlessly without requiring complex setup or configuration.
  • Stream Output
    Tape outputs results in a stream, allowing easy integration with various reporting tools and custom processing.
  • Flexible Use
    Tape allows custom test case organization and can be easily combined with other testing utilities as needed.

Possible disadvantages of Tape

  • Limited Features
    Tape lacks some advanced testing features such as spies, mocks, and code coverage out of the box, necessitating additional libraries.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Complex Testing
    For users familiar with feature-rich frameworks like Mocha or Jest, transitioning to Tape's minimalistic approach may require more effort for complex test setups.
  • Less Community Support
    Tape has a smaller community compared to larger test frameworks like Jest, which means fewer third-party plugins and support resources.
  • Limited Documentation
    While Tape's documentation covers basic concepts, it may not be comprehensive enough for developers requiring in-depth guidance or usage patterns.

Groupthink videos

What is Groupthink | Explained in 2 min

More videos:

  • Review - Adam Grant: Avoid groupthink (in a real way)
  • Review - Aschโ€™s Conformity Experiment on Groupthink

Tape videos

Which Duct Tape Brand is the Best? Let's find out!

More videos:

  • Review - Alien Tape Review: Does This As Seen on TV Tape Work?
  • Review - Nano Tape Review: Put to the Test!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Groupthink and Tape)
Productivity
40 40%
60% 60
AI
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Meetings
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Groupthink and Tape. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Tape seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Groupthink mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Groupthink yet. Tracking of Groupthink recommendations started around Oct 2023.

Tape mentions (10)

  • Express API Testing
    Last but not least important are ava, uvu and tape; they are a really light and fast test runners. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Straight talk: Salary discussion thread
    OK will do. Do you have any tips on finding a suitable project? Ideally I was hoping to to contribute to a piece of software that I actually use/know/like/want to improve. Given that, and my area of expertise, I had shortlisted Signal Desktop, and Tape. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Find component by display name when the component is stateless functional, with Enzyme
    Reactjs I have the following components: // Hello.jsexport default (React) => ({name}) => { return ( Hello {name ? Name : 'Stranger'}! )}// App.jsimport createHello from './Hello'export default (React) => () => { const Hello = createHello(React) const helloProps = { name: 'Jane' } return ( )}// index.jsimport React from 'react'import { render } from 'react-dom'import createApp from... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Tools for testing Functional Web Apps
    For us at Begin and Architect, tape has been in use for several years. Tape has a stable and straightforward API, routine maintenance updates, and outputs TAP, making it really versatile. While TAP is legible, it's not the most human-readable format. Fortunately, several TAP reporters can help display results for developers. Until recently, Begin's TAP reporter of choice was tap-spec. Sadly tap-spec wasn't kept up... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Chaijs.com just let their domain expire
    I really enjoy Ava [1] or anything assert-tape-like [2]. "uvu" [3] is getting a lot of love lately, but it's very feature limited and much of it's touted advantages are at the detriment to feature set. [1] https://github.com/avajs/ava [2] https://github.com/substack/tape [3] https://github.com/lukeed/uvu Jest is great for front-end (or full stack integration) testing, but I feel it's specialized for that use-case... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Groupthink and Tape, you can also consider the following products

ZipMessage - ZipMessage replaces live meetings with asynchronous conversations.

Meetingbird - Powerful meeting scheduling and notes โ€” right in your calendar

Mocha - Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.

Retime - Retime makes it easy for you to reschedule your meetings.

Jasmine - Behavior-Driven JavaScript

Shepherd - Opens quality content you choose instead of Facebook/Twitter