Table of contents
Simplicity
Tape provides a minimal and straightforward API that makes it easy to write and read tests without a lot of boilerplate.
No Globals
Tape does not introduce any global variables into the test environment, which helps avoid potential conflicts and promotes a cleaner test setup.
Node.js Compatibility
As a testing tool primarily designed for Node.js, Tape integrates seamlessly without requiring complex setup or configuration.
Stream Output
Tape outputs results in a stream, allowing easy integration with various reporting tools and custom processing.
Flexible Use
Tape allows custom test case organization and can be easily combined with other testing utilities as needed.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Tape is good.
Check the traffic stats of Tape on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Tape on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Tape's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Tape on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Tape on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Last but not least important are ava, uvu and tape; they are a really light and fast test runners. Source: over 2 years ago
OK will do. Do you have any tips on finding a suitable project? Ideally I was hoping to to contribute to a piece of software that I actually use/know/like/want to improve. Given that, and my area of expertise, I had shortlisted Signal Desktop, and Tape. Source: almost 3 years ago
Reactjs I have the following components: // Hello.jsexport default (React) => ({name}) => { return ( Hello {name ? Name : 'Stranger'}! )}// App.jsimport createHello from './Hello'export default (React) => () => { const Hello = createHello(React) const helloProps = { name: 'Jane' } return ( )}// index.jsimport React from 'react'import { render } from 'react-dom'import createApp from... Source: over 3 years ago
For us at Begin and Architect, tape has been in use for several years. Tape has a stable and straightforward API, routine maintenance updates, and outputs TAP, making it really versatile. While TAP is legible, it's not the most human-readable format. Fortunately, several TAP reporters can help display results for developers. Until recently, Begin's TAP reporter of choice was tap-spec. Sadly tap-spec wasn't kept up... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
I really enjoy Ava [1] or anything assert-tape-like [2]. "uvu" [3] is getting a lot of love lately, but it's very feature limited and much of it's touted advantages are at the detriment to feature set. [1] https://github.com/avajs/ava [2] https://github.com/substack/tape [3] https://github.com/lukeed/uvu Jest is great for front-end (or full stack integration) testing, but I feel it's specialized for that use-case... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
We also made the choice to abandon Jest which causes too many problems 😟. We now use tape. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
Another good one is tape. Very easy, minimal setup, more lightweight than Jest, which comes with its own pros and cons. Source: almost 4 years ago
Hi all. In a test file, I've added several unit tests using the Tape test harness. What I'd like to do now is ensure that, if at least one of my unit tests fails (screenshot), some custom JS code is executed. How would I approach that? Source: about 4 years ago
I am familiar with unit testing (using Tape). But if I understand correctly, things like HTTP requests fall more in the category of integration testing, rather than unit testing? Source: about 4 years ago
I'm using Tape. I don't think it has any mocking functionality built in. Source: over 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Tape to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Tape good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Tape here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
