Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Grasshopper VS Hyper

Compare Grasshopper VS Hyper and see what are their differences

Grasshopper

Grasshopper enables entrepreneurs to build a virtual office that connects callers to employees, wherever they are.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Hyper

Extensible, cross-platform terminal built on open web standards.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
VoIPstudio
VoIPstudio is an award-winning VoIP system that offers businesses of all sizes a scalable communication solution. It’s affordable, easy-to-use, offers a full suite of PBX features, and is fully integrated for CRM. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Hyper should be more popular than Grasshopper. It has been mentioned 47 times since March 2021.

social mentions
5 vs 47
Communication popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Grasshopper
Hyper
Website grasshopper.com hyper.is
Pricing
Official pricing
Open source
Listed in
Communication VoIP Enterprise Communication Virtual Office +1
Terminal Tools Emulators Developer Tools Terminal +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Grasshopper 5 features
Hyper 5 features
  • Professional Image
    Grasshopper helps small businesses project a more professional image with features like a dedicated business number, custom greetings, and voicemail transcription.
  • Portability
    The virtual phone system allows you to make and receive calls on your existing devices, so you can manage your business calls from anywhere.
  • Ease of Use
    Grasshopper is designed to be user-friendly with a straightforward setup process, making it accessible for businesses without technical expertise.
  • Scalability
    Grasshopper offers a variety of plans, allowing businesses to scale their communication needs as they grow.
  • Features
    Grasshopper includes a range of useful features such as call forwarding, business texting, voicemail transcription, and extensions, catering to various business needs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Grasshopper's pricing may be considered high for very small businesses or startups, especially when compared to other VoIP services.
  • Limited International Features
    The service's international call capabilities are limited, which might be a drawback for businesses with a global client base.
  • No Unified Communication Platform
    Grasshopper focuses solely on phone services and does not offer a unified communication platform that includes video conferencing or team messaging.
  • Call Quality
    Some users have reported occasional call quality issues, such as dropped calls or static, which can hamper business communications.
  • Lack of Integration
    Grasshopper does not offer many integrations with other business software, which could be a limitation for companies looking to streamline their operations.
  • Cross-Platform
    Hyper is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for users on different platforms.
  • Extensibility
    Hyper is built on web technologies like JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, allowing users to customize and extend it with plugins and themes easily.
  • Modern UI
    It offers a sleek and modern user interface that is visually appealing and user-friendly.
  • Performance
    Despite being built on Electron, Hyper's performance is generally satisfactory for the majority of terminal tasks.
  • Ecosystem
    A rich ecosystem of plugins and themes is available, which enhances the terminal's functionality and customization options.

Possible disadvantages

  • Resource Usage
    As an Electron-based application, Hyper can consume more memory and CPU compared to more lightweight terminal emulators.
  • Startup Time
    Hyper may have a slower startup time compared to native terminal applications because it initializes a lot of components at launch.
  • Complexity
    For users who are not familiar with web development technologies, customizing and extending Hyper might be challenging.
  • Stability
    Occasional bugs and crashes can occur, especially when using numerous plugins or custom configurations.
  • Native Feature Gaps
    Some of the features available in native terminal emulators might be missing or less optimized in Hyper.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Grasshopper
Hyper

Overall verdict

  • Grasshopper is generally considered a good option for small businesses and entrepreneurs who need a cost-effective, easy-to-implement phone system. It offers a solid set of features that can streamline communications and help maintain a professional image. However, it may lack some advanced functionalities that larger enterprises require.

Why this product is good

  • Grasshopper is a virtual phone system designed for entrepreneurs and small businesses. It provides users with a professional phone number that can be used to manage calls through dedicated apps, without the need for a separate phone line or device. Features such as call forwarding, voicemail transcription, and business SMS make it a flexible and efficient tool for managing business communications.

Recommended for

  • Entrepreneurs and small business owners looking for a virtual phone system.
  • Freelancers who need a professional phone presence without using personal lines.
  • Businesses looking for a solution that is easy to set up and use without technical expertise.

Overall verdict

  • Hyper is a good choice for users who value customization and a visually appealing interface over performance. While it may not match the speed and efficiency of native terminal applications, its flexibility and design appeal to those who are comfortable with and prefer Electron-based applications.

Why this product is good

  • Hyper is an electron-based terminal that is highly customizable, allowing users to enhance its functionality through plugins and themes. It's built with web technologies, making it easy for developers familiar with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS to contribute and modify. This enables a rich ecosystem of community contributions, offering users a wide variety of enhancements to tailor the terminal experience to their needs.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer a customizable terminal environment
  • Users who enjoy experimenting with plugins and themes
  • Individuals who prioritize design and aesthetics in their tooling

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Grasshopper 3 videos + Add
Hyper 3 videos + Add

Grasshopper Phone System Review | ENTREPRENEURS NEED THIS

More videos

  • - Grasshopper Phone System Review: Pricing, Complaints, Number Comparisons - RingCentral Phone.com
  • - 5 Reasons Grasshopper VOIP is NOT GOOD for Small Business

Motorola One Hyper Review

More videos

  • - SKECHERS GOrun RAZOR 3 HYPER & GOrun 7 HYPER REVIEW | The Ginger Runner
  • - Motorola One Hyper "Real Review"

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Grasshopper
Hyper
100% 100%
Communication
0% 0%
0% 0%
Terminal Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
VoIP
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Grasshopper and Hyper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Grasshopper no reviews yet
Hyper no reviews yet

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Grasshopper 5 mentions
Hyper 47 mentions
  • Best alternative to personal cell phone for business use?
    Grasshopper works great. https://grasshopper.com/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • In their efforts to put every round from the clip into their foot, Blizzard will be recording voice chat in Overwatch 1.5(Also your account requires a phone number now)
    Get a burner number, there's services for that. Something like Grasshopper. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Toll-Free Number
    I used grasshopper.com successfully. Not sure what the free tier is now. Source: about 4 years ago

View more

  • A Fig That Works Anywhere — FaiTerm
    This was Fig's smartest move. Every other approach at the time either forced you onto a brand-new terminal emulator (Warp, Tabby) or left you stuck with the weak completion of the day. Fig chose to piggyback instead — it supported macOS... - Source: dev.to / about 16 hours ago
  • Ratty – A terminal emulator with inline 3D graphics
    Or Terminal is already a full featured web browser? https://hyper.is/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Show HN: Hyper – Standards first React alternative
    I wish open-source projects checked to see if other projects share the same name. Especially since there are packages in NPM already about hyper. https://hyper.is/ has been around for a while and is kind of big. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to Grasshopper and Hyper

When comparing Grasshopper and Hyper, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...