Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Scholar VS Arc.dev

Compare Google Scholar VS Arc.dev and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Google Scholar logo Google Scholar

Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...

Arc.dev logo Arc.dev

Arc is the remote career platform helping developers build amazing careers from anywhere. Find thousands of top remote developer jobs online all in one place!
  • Google Scholar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-07
  • Arc.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-07

Google Scholar features and specs

  • Accessibility
    Google Scholar is freely accessible to anyone with an internet connection, removing barriers to accessing academic research.
  • Wide Range of Sources
    It indexes scholarly articles from a broad range of disciplines and sources, including academic publishers, universities, and other scholarly websites.
  • Citation Tracking
    Google Scholar provides citation information, allowing users to see how often a paper has been cited and to track the influence of research over time.
  • Ease of Use
    The interface is user-friendly and familiar to anyone who has used Google, making it easy to search for and find scholarly papers.
  • Advanced Search Options
    Google Scholar offers advanced search capabilities, including the ability to search by author, date range, and specific journals.

Possible disadvantages of Google Scholar

  • Quality Control
    The inclusion criteria for sources indexed are not transparent, leading to variability in the quality of the materials available.
  • Coverage
    Although extensive, Google Scholar's coverage is not comprehensive, and some important journals and articles might be missing.
  • Duplicate Entries
    There can be multiple entries for the same document, making it difficult to determine the most authoritative version.
  • Limited Full-Text Availability
    Many articles listed in Google Scholar are behind paywalls, meaning full access often requires a subscription or purchase.
  • Inconsistent Metadata
    The metadata (author names, publication dates, etc.) can sometimes be inaccurate or incomplete, affecting search results and citation tracking.

Arc.dev features and specs

  • Quality Talent
    Arc.dev screens and vets developers, ensuring high-quality talent is available for hire.
  • Remote Focused
    The platform is designed specifically for remote work, which is increasingly relevant in today's job market.
  • Flexible Hiring
    Arc.dev offers flexible hiring options, including full-time, part-time, and contract roles.
  • Global Reach
    Employers have access to a global pool of developers, providing a broader range of skills and expertise.
  • Hiring Assistance
    Arc.dev provides dedicated hiring consultants to help match employers with the right developers.
  • Community and Resources
    Developers have access to a supportive community and resources to help them grow their careers.

Possible disadvantages of Arc.dev

  • Cost
    Hiring through Arc.dev can be more expensive than other platforms, given the quality and vetting process involved.
  • Niche Market
    The platform primarily caters to tech and development roles, which may not be suitable for companies looking for a wider range of skill sets.
  • Vetting Process Delay
    The thorough vetting process can sometimes lead to delays in hiring, which may not suit urgent hiring needs.
  • Geographical Constraints
    While remote work is emphasized, certain employers might face challenges with time zone differences.
  • Platform Fee
    Arc.dev charges a platform fee, which might be a barrier for startups or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Limited User Control
    Employers might find the process less flexible compared to directly hiring through other platforms, due to the involvement of hiring consultants.

Analysis of Google Scholar

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Google Scholar is considered a good resource for academic research. It is user-friendly, provides comprehensive search results, and includes useful features such as citation analysis and linking to full-text articles when available. However, it may not have access to all subscription-only content available through university libraries or specialized databases.

Why this product is good

  • Google Scholar is a valuable tool because it provides free access to a vast range of scholarly articles, theses, books, conference papers, and patents across various disciplines. It indexes content from academic publishers, research institutions, and other scholarly websites, making it a convenient resource for researchers, students, and academics. Its citation tracking feature is particularly useful for understanding the impact and relevance of specific works.

Recommended for

  • Students looking for scholarly articles for their assignments.
  • Researchers who want to track citations and research trends.
  • Academics needing access to a wide range of publications.
  • Anyone interested in finding reliable, peer-reviewed sources for information.

Google Scholar videos

How to do a literature review using Google Scholar

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use Google Scholar | Writing A Literature Review
  • Tutorial - How to use Google Scholar to find journal articles | Essay Tips

Arc.dev videos

Remote Work For Developers | Why I Invested In Arc.Dev on Wefunder (YC Startup)

More videos:

  • Review - ARC.DEV (FKA CODEMENTORX) REVIEW: ALTERNATIVES AND COMPETITORS FOR 2020
  • Review - Arc 2.0 - The Easiest Way to Find Remote Developer Jobs | Arc.dev

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Scholar and Arc.dev)
Digital Whiteboard
100 100%
0% 0
Remote Jobs
0 0%
100% 100
Research Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Job Boards
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Scholar and Arc.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Scholar and Arc.dev

Google Scholar Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Scholar yet.
Be the first one to post

Arc.dev Reviews

Comparing Andela, Turing, Toptal, Micro1, Arc.dev, and Wajusoft
When comparing these platforms, several key features stand out. Andela and Turing provide access to a large talent pool of vetted developers. Toptal, Arc.dev and micro1 offer specialized expertise and agile development practices, respectively. Wajusoft excels in flexibility in team scaling and tailored solutions.
Top 10 Websites to Find Remote Jobs
Who Should Sign UpโญArc caters to a wide range of experience levels. Newbies can benefit from career guidance and skill-building resources, while experienced developers will find a curated selection of high-quality remote positions from top companies.
Best Freelancer.com Alternatives For Hiring Developers
Arc.dev uses a strict vetting process like other top-rated online marketplaces. It utilizes various assessment tools to ensure its freelancers are of the highest quality. Unlike Freelancer, where you can hire freelancers for the long and short term, Arc.dev focuses on helping companies hire full-time and long-term remote-working developers. The platform ensures all parties...
Forget LinkedIn: The Top 10 Remote Work Alternatives for Landing Your Dream Tech Job Remotely
Arc: Leveraging AI, Arc is a global remote jobs marketplace connecting companies with talented software developers.
Source: dev.to

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Scholar seems to be a lot more popular than Arc.dev. While we know about 1004 links to Google Scholar, we've tracked only 22 mentions of Arc.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Scholar mentions (1004)

  • Who discovered grokking and why is the name hard to find?
    Https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02177 This paper is not hard to find; it's the first result when you search for "grokking" with https://scholar.google.com. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • AI generated font using nano banana
    Definitely not the first AI generated font. One can find an enormous amount of research in AI font generation on https://scholar.google.com/ going back many years. This could possibly be the first one that used Nano Banana though. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • ChatGPT Search
    > Has google completely stopped working for anyone else? Yes. However, I found that https://scholar.google.com still works perfectly well. It feels just as the old Google without all the crap they've been adding in the last years. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Is Psychology Going to Cincinnati?
    He links to a meta analysis* that says CBT does cure depression well enough and does so consistently for many decades without any declines in effectiveness. Later for some reason, he says no single mental illness was ever cured. It seems the main point of the article is to say that nothing except "nudges" ever worked in psychology - this is nonsense that he himself contradicts as I mentioned above. Just use... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Where do you subscribe to published journal topics?
    If you mean articles: No, it would be unfeasible. According to Science [https://www.science.org/content/article/scienceadviser-scientists-are-publishing-too-many-papers-and-s-bad-science] there are about 2.82 million articles coming out every year. That's 5.3 papers every minute, 24/7. If you mean a list of titles, your best bet would probably be something like https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ [PMC, life... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

Arc.dev mentions (22)

  • Top 7 Remote Job Boards for Software Engineers (No "Fake Remote" BS)
    Arc flips the traditional job search model. Itโ€™s an exclusive network primarily aimed at senior developers. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Which Hiring Platforms Offer Risk-Free Trials for ReactJS Developers?
    Arc.dev offers companies both full-time and freelance recruiting options for qualified ReactJS engineers. They provide a two-week risk-free trial so businesses can evaluate the developer's abilities and suitability. Businesses can stop operating without incurring any costs if they are not happy. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Best Websites to Hire Remote Software Developers in USA
    Arc.dev Arc.dev specializes in connecting companies with remote developers, designers, and marketers. With a focus on quality, Arc.dev provides access to vetted candidates with domain expertise and English fluency. The platform's unique approach to candidate matching saves time and ensures you find the right fit quickly. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Just Moved to Vienna
    Hallo Leute aus ร–sterreich! I just made my move to Wien, finally. I am offering my Software Engineering Consulting Services and/or Digital Product Management services to anyone who wants to launch an MVP in the digital space in a short manner, or join/lead a small team. Enterprise-grade stuff (I am ex-IBM CIO), no shady businesses, US entity. My profile: https://arc.dev/@arpad Before going into the Software space... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • ๐Ÿ’ผ 50 Tips to Land a Remote Tech Job Based on My 45-Day Journey to 2 Offers
    To be honest, it's another rabbit hole. In my whole experience history with these job platforms, I can 100% backup G2i as I got a dream job there and Toptal, Lemon.io, Turing, and Arc.dev are fine but people have different opinions about them, sometimes they want to charge you a lot, sometimes there is a lack of jobs, etc. It's a thing to consider, but hear this out. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Scholar and Arc.dev, you can also consider the following products

PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Flexiple - Flexiple helps companies work with top tech talent within 48 hours to 7 days. Our talent are handpicked through a rigorous screening process and are alumni from top tech companies such as Amazon, Adobe, Microsoft, amongst others.

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

Toptal - Hire the Top 3% of Freelance Talentยฎ. Toptal is an exclusive network of the top freelance software developers, designers, finance experts, product managers, and project managers in the world.

Forge - Static web hosting made simple

Upwork - Forget the old rules. You can have the best people. Right now. Right here.