Notes, tasks, passwords, journal, files, calendar, contacts and bookmarks, with mood and medication tracking. Encrypted on your device. Open source, no ads, no trackers. Free forever; Pro is a one-time purchase.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Logseq
seems to be a lot more popular than Google Project Shield.
While we know about 300 links to Logseq,
we've tracked only 16 mentions of Google Project Shield.
social mentions
16 vs 300
CDN popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
13 vs 240+
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Protection Against DDoS Attacks Project Shield uses Google's infrastructure to absorb and counteract Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, ensuring that websites remain accessible during such attacks.
Free Service for Eligible Websites The service is offered free of charge to news, human rights, and political sites, supporting the flow of information without financial burden.
Enhanced Website Reliability By protecting against attacks that could take websites offline, Project Shield enhances the reliability and availability of essential online services.
Part of Google's Security Suite As part of Google's range of security products, Project Shield benefits from continuous improvements and integration with broader security solutions.
Possible disadvantages
Eligibility Limitations Only certain types of websites, such as those focusing on news, human rights, or elections, are eligible, potentially excluding other at-risk sites from protection.
Dependence on Google Infrastructure Relying on Google's infrastructure could create dependency issues or concerns about corporate influence and data handling.
Potential Latency Issues Routing traffic through Google's systems might introduce latency, potentially impacting website performance for end-users.
Data Privacy Concerns Some organizations might be concerned about privacy implications, as the service could give Google visibility over site traffic and data.
Bidirectional Linking Logseq allows users to easily create bidirectional links between notes, enhancing organization and navigation through related information.
Graph View The graph view provides a visual representation of how notes are interconnected, helping users see the bigger picture of their knowledge network.
Markdown Support Logseq supports Markdown, making it easy to format notes and write in a widely-used plain text format.
Local Storage Notes are stored locally, giving users full control over their data and enhancing privacy and security.
Customizable Workflows Users can customize their workflows with plugins and templates to suit their specific needs and preferences.
Open Source Being an open-source project, Logseq invites community contributions and ensures more transparency in development and issue resolution.
Task Management Logseq integrates task management features, such as to-do lists and scheduling, directly within notes, improving productivity.
Possible disadvantages
Learning Curve New users may find Logseq's extensive features and unique workflow approach challenging to learn without dedicated time and effort.
Sync Complexity While storing notes locally is a pro for privacy, it requires additional tools or manual methods to sync notes across multiple devices.
Mobile App Limitations The mobile version of Logseq is still in development, meaning it may lack some features and fluidity found in the desktop version.
Resource Intensive Logseq can consume considerable system resources, particularly when dealing with large datasets or extensive use of graph view.
Community Dependency As an open-source project, certain features may rely on community contributions, which could lead to inconsistent updates or support.
Customization Complexity While high customization is a benefit, it can become overwhelming and complex to manage for users who prefer a more straightforward tool.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
Google Project ShieldLogseq
No analysis of Google Project Shield yet.
Overall verdict
Yes, Logseq is generally considered a good tool, particularly for individuals seeking a robust, free-form method of organizing notes and knowledge that goes beyond traditional hierarchical models.
Why this product is good
Logseq is a versatile tool for managing notes and knowledge using a graph-based interface similar to networked thought processing. It offers features like linked references, back-linking, and support for Markdown and org-mode, making it a valuable tool for those who value interconnected note-taking. Its open-source nature ensures constant community-driven improvements and transparency, encouraging a strong user community.
Recommended for
Students and researchers who manage a large volume of interconnected notes.
Professionals who require a flexible and dynamic knowledge management system.
Writers and content creators looking for a tool to visualize ideas and concepts.
Tech enthusiasts and developers who appreciate open-source software.
Videos
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Google Project Shield0 videos+ AddLogseq3 videos+ Add
No Google Project Shield videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Logseq - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal
More videos
-
How I use Logseq Daily - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal
-
Logseq Update Video - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal
Category popularity
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.
Logseq is a powerful and advanced tool for thought that has been gaining attention among note-taking enthusiasts and productivity seekers. In this article, we will provide an overview of Logseq, explore what users can...
Outliners (think Workflowy, Roam, Logseq) rely on blocks and indentation for primary connections, and references to other blocks or pages for richer links. They’re optimized for capturing quick thinking.
Refined user interface: Logseq offers a refined user interface that is easy to understand and pleasing to the eyes. On the other hand, Obsidian looks like a jumble of various UI elements which are hard to figure out...
Check out Signal. If your friend is a journalist, they should look at Google’s Jigsaw project (https://jigsaw.google.com).
Source:
almost 4 years ago
Jigsaw Research Participation Invitation NOV 3-DEC 2
The Jigsaw User Experience Research Team is gathering feedback about Outline!
Source:
almost 4 years ago
Starting next week Google subsidary Jigsaw will blanket Poland with video ads "designed to help people identify and refute derogatory tropes about migrants"
CEO of Jigsaw, Yasmin Green, is a board member of the ADL.
Source:
about 4 years ago
Using Logseq[1][2] for years and quite happy with it, especially since it has apps for tablets/iPad and phones as well, while being completely FOSS. [1] https://logseq.com/ [2] https://github.com/logseq/logseq.
- Source: Hacker News
/
4 months ago
Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control.
- Source: dev.to
/
6 months ago
Forgetful gets procedural and prospective memory
I should call out another thing that convinced me was a user of forgetful (twsta) posted in the discord a skill for managing wok and todos from how they used to use Logseq.
- Source: dev.to
/
8 months ago
Joplin is a free, open source note taking and to-do application, which can handle a large number of notes organised into notebooks. The notes are searchable, tagged and modified either from the applications directly or from your own text editor.
Compare Joplin to Google Project Shield or Logseq:
Cloudflare Spectrum
Kilo SSL
CloudFlare
Cloudanix
Dhound
Vanta
Google Earth VR
Obsidian
Notion
Joplin
Evernote
Anytype.io
Roam Research
Standard Notes
