Google Forms Reviews

1. Ural_Taras

   almost 2 years ago
   Very convenient software!

   Helps my company solve many issues. We collect information from clients and employees. We conduct surveys and collect data. Very useful software. Helps form a common opinion, conduct analysis and analytics.

   🏁 Competitors: Survio

   👍 Pros:    Speed|Visual|Functionality
2. ✓ Adrian | Mobile Forms - Digital Inspections - Enterprise Checklists - Data collection

   · Marketing at Mobile Forms · about 6 years ago
   A good beginners tool to start your digital transformation.

   One of our customers said: Our small mining operation needed to go from paper based process to digital forms. At first, Google forms allowed us to use this Web-based platform that lets individuals and businesses of all sizes build customizable forms to conduct surveys and generate real-time response charts.

   We saw that a small sample of our field workers quickly adopted the new way of working.

   Step 1: accomplished.

   Now unto step 2.

   How do we deploy this unto our whole team? We needed email notifications, offline response collection when without wifi on the field. Our CIO and his director of operations needed deep data and trends analysis as well. Our inspectors, when doing their audits, needed to capture approx. 25 high definition pictures, some audio notes and a video which wasn't really possible with google forms.

   So, we can 100% credit the use of google forms to our transition towards a paperless process, but as we navigated saashub.com a little more, we were able to discover a world of alternatives. We strongly suggest to start using google forms before undergoing a big implementation plan towards such enterprise level inspection tools like nspek or even cheaper solutions like prontoforms.

   I am not sure if we would start with google's solution first if we would to do this digital transformation all over, but it did allow us to discover it's limits pretty quickly.

   At some point, we needed custom fields and functions, and none of us was able to code, so the nSpek training that comes with the application definitely sets it's self apart, giving us full autonomy.

   🏁 Competitors: nSpek, ProntoForms

   👍 Pros:    No sign up cost

   👎 Cons:    Customization|Customer support|Data protection and security|No video|No pictures

Textures.com Reviews

Google Forms mentions (0)

Textures.com mentions (179)

• 🧐 Textures.com - The site where the Mh370 cloud photos were traced back to says there is something odd with their audited logs. Rule 2: Discussion must be on-topic.

  Been using textures.com for a very long time, they are awesome, so all the best to them! Source: over 2 years ago

• The clouds in Jonas' photos match the clouds in the satellite footage of the same area on January 25th, 2012

  Everybody needs to take a deep breath because something reeks about the Jonas debunk. He may have been manipulated to find altered photos integrated into his legitimate data set. Check out this post today by Textures.com from a post today on X. Also... Another post by Ken S (@KStaubin) today calls into question the legitimacy of the data set. Source: over 2 years ago

• Jonas, the individual who claims to have taken the "original" cloud pics admits to photo manipulation in the past. Opposition is attacking the videos. We are in the thick of it. More to come later.

  Above, you say it's shady that Jonas is business partners with the texture.com owner, when he literally took photos of those clouds for textures.com, which makes him a business partner. That's why the photos came to exist in the first place. Source: over 2 years ago

• If the video is a hoax, why would some agency create this video in 2014?

  Video being real, clouds planted by the CIA later except for the 2 or 3 found on archive.org (or maybe they hacked into archive.org), person working for textures.com on twitter is a plant, stock footage altered after the fact to look vaguely like the video. Jonas is a plant. Ashton Forbes is a plant to make the believers look like idiots. Source: over 2 years ago

• The Aerials0028 image did not get archived in 2012. Here is an explanation. Decide for yourself.

  We can also confirm the photo was on the website as soon as it was re-launched as textures.com in 2016. All of the other images on the website appeared at that time, it was not that single image being uploaded. Source: over 2 years ago