
Redis
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Amazon ElastiCache
MemCachier
Memcached Cloud
Google BigQuery
Google Cloud Filestore
Redis Hosting

MemCachier
Memcached Cloud
Redis
IronCache
Amazon ElastiCache
cachegrand
Cachengo
Boring infrastructure, honestly priced.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Google Cloud Memorystore seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 10 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | cloud.google.com | velstash.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Google Cloud Memorystore yet.
Managed memcached. Dramatically cheaper than AWS ElastiCache, Azure Cache, and GCP Memorystore — 100MB free, no credit card required.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Google Cloud Memorystore and Velstash Cache.
Velstash Cache's answer:
Velstash speaks the standard Memcached protocol with no proprietary SDK — so it's a true drop-in replacement rather than something that locks you into a new client library or API. Optional TLS is available for teams that want encrypted connections without configuring it themselves, and the pricing is simple and predictable (from a free 100 MB tier up to 16 GB plans), avoiding the usage-based cost complexity common with hyperscaler cache services.
Velstash Cache's answer:
Most alternatives are either self-hosted (meaning you own all the ops burden — patching, monitoring, failover) or bundled into a hyperscaler ecosystem with confusing instance sizing and pricing that scales unpredictably. Velstash gives you a managed, protocol-compatible Memcached instance with clear, flat pricing tiers, so you get the reliability of a managed service without the vendor lock-in or the cost surprises.
Share your experience with using Google Cloud Memorystore and Velstash Cache. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


By default, your Cloud Run instances connect to the internet directly. But if your service needs to reach private resources (a Cloud SQL database, a Memorystore Redis instance, an internal API), it needs VPC access. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
In-memory caching shared across instances. There are no sticky sessions by default (though session affinity is available on a best-effort basis). Each request might hit a different instance. If you need shared state, you need an external... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
How did you come to that conclusion? GCP is still offering Memorystore for Redis, Valkey and Memcached. https://cloud.google.com/memorystore. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Tracking Velstash Cache since Sep 2026.
When comparing Google Cloud Memorystore and Velstash Cache, you can also consider the following products.

Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.
Compare Redis to Google Cloud Memorystore or Velstash Cache:


Cloud Pub/Sub is a flexible, reliable, real-time messaging service for independent applications to publish & subscribe to asynchronous events.
Compare Google Cloud Pub/Sub to Google Cloud Memorystore or Velstash Cache:

The technology behind Memcached Cloud is built on the proven technology powering the Redis Cloud service.
Compare Memcached Cloud to Google Cloud Memorystore or Velstash Cache:

Amazon ElastiCache offers fully managed Redis and Memcached. Seamlessly deploy, operate, and scale popular open source compatible in-memory data stores.
Compare Amazon ElastiCache to Google Cloud Memorystore or Velstash Cache:

Elastic, scalable, highly available, secure cloud-based key/value store.
Compare IronCache to Google Cloud Memorystore or Velstash Cache: