I imagine that would work. I'd probably default to a redis https://cloud.google.com/memorystore because it feels more boring to me. Source: 5 months ago
I suggest you to use realtime database. It is cheaper than Memorystore (if you use in Google Cloud) and realtime database has a free tier. Source: 10 months ago
Memorystore is Google-hosted Redis/Memcached. You could set up a virtual machine and install Redis/Memcached yourself, but Memorystore eliminates that extra work and provides you with a well-working cache out of the box. Source: about 1 year ago
Memorystore is the managed cache service on GCP. https://cloud.google.com/memorystore. Source: over 1 year ago
Memorystore, the GCP managed service for cache, is not a service by itself, you need to choice the backend behind with Redis or memcached. These two kinds of configurations for Memorystore do not have the same model pricing. Memorystore for memcached is mostly based on Compute Engine model with pricing based on the number of nodes and vCPU + RAM per node. Even if the model pricing is nearly the same, the... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Cloud Memorystore: Managed Redis and Memcached 🔗Link 🔗Link. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Do you know an article comparing Google Cloud Memorystore to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about Google Cloud Memorystore. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.