bauh (ba-oo), formerly known as fpakman, is a graphical interface for managing your Linux software (packages/applications). It currently supports the following formats: AppImage, ArchLinux repositories/AUR, Flatpak, Snap and Web applications.
Uptime monitoring, status pages, and error tracking that show every region's reading, not one green dot. Flat pricing, no per-subscriber fees, real free tier.
sponsored
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, bauh
seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned
12 times
since March 2021.
social mentions
0 vs 12
JS Build Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
98 vs 29
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Portability GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
Dependency Management It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
Open Source Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
Wide Adoption It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
Efficiency GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.
Possible disadvantages
Complex Syntax The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
Limited Cross-Platform Scripting While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
Steep Learning Curve Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
Debugging Difficulty Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
Performance Bottlenecks For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.
Universal Package Management Bauh provides a unified interface for managing various types of packages and applications, including native system packages and third-party formats like AppImage, Flatpak, Snap, and NPM.
User-Friendly Interface It offers a graphical user interface that simplifies the management of software, making it accessible to users who may not be comfortable using command-line tools.
Extensive App Support Bauh supports a wide range of applications and package formats, increasing flexibility and availability of software for users.
Multilingual Support The application provides support for multiple languages, making it more accessible to a global user base.
Cross-Platform Bauh is designed to work on various Linux distributions, enhancing its adaptability across different operating environments.
Possible disadvantages
Limited to Linux Bauh is primarily designed for the Linux operating system, so users of other operating systems cannot take advantage of its features.
Dependency on External Libraries Bauh may require additional packages and dependencies that need to be installed separately, which can complicate setup for some users.
Resource Consumption Running a graphical application for package management could consume more system resources compared to command-line alternatives, potentially impacting performance on low-spec systems.
Lack of In-depth Documentation Some users may find the documentation for Bauh to be less comprehensive, which can make troubleshooting and advanced usage more challenging.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
GNU Makebauh
Overall verdict
Yes, GNU Make is a robust and reliable tool for managing build processes. Its long-established reputation and widespread use in both open-source and commercial projects underline its effectiveness and flexibility.
Why this product is good
GNU Make is widely used because it automates the build process, efficiently handling dependencies and detecting minimal sets of changes in source files. It is highly customizable, supports non-recursive builds, and integrates well into various development environments.
Recommended for
Software developers working on C/C++ projects
Teams looking to automate build processes
Projects that require cross-platform build capabilities
Share your experience with using GNU Make and bauh.
For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Social recommendations and mentions
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
GNU Make0 mentionsbauh12 mentions
Tracking GNU Make since Mar 2021.
Imade a simple shell script program to manage packages in Linux. Currently it supports apt, flatpak, snap. It can probably be useful for someone.
Like bauh which supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications.
Source:
over 3 years ago
Problems installing many apps
If you really want a GUI package manager that doesn't break EndeavourOS, I've had a good experience with bauh when I started using EOS. But I also do everything with yay now, as others have suggested, it is more convenient once you know...
Source:
almost 4 years ago
Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully,...
Source:
almost 4 years ago
CMake
SCons
SBT
npm
Gradle
Brunch
Ninja Build
Snap Store
Synaptic
GNOME Software
AppImagePool
Update Manager
Fluxguard
Souk
