Pale Moon
Brave
Vivaldi
qutebrowser
Mozilla Firefox
Midori
Whale
Gnuzilla is the GNU version of the Mozilla suite, and GNU IceCat is the GNU version of the ...

ScreenshotOne
Urlbox
ApiFlash
HTMLCSS to Image API
CaptureKit.dev
Screenshot Machine
CloudBrowser.co
Generate beautiful website screenshots using our fast website screenshot API.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ScreenshotAPI.net seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
GNU
GNU IceCat
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | gnu.org | screenshotapi.net |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | 2019 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

No description of GNU IceCat yet.
Use a simple API call to take pixel-perfect screenshots of any website.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Users who prioritize privacy and free software principles. It's ideal for those who want a browsing experience that minimizes tracking, avoids proprietary software, and prefers open-source solutions.
No analysis of ScreenshotAPI.net yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
GNU Icecat Installation & Review
More videos
No ScreenshotAPI.net videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Share your experience with using GNU IceCat and ScreenshotAPI.net. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

We have no reviews of GNU IceCat yet. Be the first one to post
ScreenshotAPI keeps things simple and cost-effective. It’s a good entry-level option for developers who just need basic screenshot capture without complex infrastructure or anti-bot features.
Works as it should!
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Tracking GNU IceCat since Mar 2021.
ApiFlash is fast and cheap (Chrome on AWS Lambda, $7/mo for 1,000) but has only Third-party MCP wrappers — fine for a quick experiment, riskier for production. ScreenshotAPI.net Has a broad parameter set (element capture, video, PDF,... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
ScreenshotAPI.net - Screenshot API use one simple API call to generate screenshots of any website. Build to scale and hosted on Google Cloud. Offers 100 free screenshots per month. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
When comparing GNU IceCat and ScreenshotAPI.net, you can also consider the following products.

Pale Moon is an Open Source, Mozilla-derived web browser available for Microsoft Windows and Linux, focusing on efficiency and ease of use.
Compare Pale Moon to GNU IceCat or ScreenshotAPI.net:

Fast and reliable screenshot API built to handle millions of screenshots a month.
Compare ScreenshotOne to GNU IceCat or ScreenshotAPI.net:

Fast and secure, ad and tracker blocking browser.
Compare Brave to GNU IceCat or ScreenshotAPI.net:

Screenshot full page websites in retina resolution with Urlbox.io screenshot as a service API. Urlbox is the best provider of automated website screenshots offering many unique options and features.
Compare Urlbox to GNU IceCat or ScreenshotAPI.net:

Vivaldi is a free, fast web browser designed for power-users. You decide how you browse. Download Vivaldi's fully customisable browser now and browse your way.
Compare Vivaldi to GNU IceCat or ScreenshotAPI.net:

ApiFlash is a powerful serverless screenshot API built with Chromium and AWS Lambda. It can easily scale to millions of screenshots per day and has an ever growing number of satisfied big clients.
Compare ApiFlash to GNU IceCat or ScreenshotAPI.net: