Software Alternatives & Startups

GitHub VS FileMaker

Compare GitHub VS FileMaker and see what are their differences

GitHub

Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Rating
5.0 · 2 reviews
Pricing
Open source
FileMaker

FileMaker is a relational database solution.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, GitHub seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2526 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2,526 vs 0
Software Development popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 65

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

GitHub
FileMaker
Website github.com filemaker.com
Pricing
Open source Official pricing
—
Company Startup from the United States · 500 - 999 employees · 2008 —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

GitHub 6 features
FileMaker 5 features
  • collaboration
    GitHub provides a platform for multiple developers to work on the same project concurrently, facilitating collaboration through features like pull requests, code reviews, and issues tracking.
  • integration
    GitHub integrates seamlessly with various third-party tools and services, such as CI/CD pipelines, project management tools, and many development environments, enhancing productivity and workflow efficiency.
  • version_control
    Utilizes Git for version control, allowing users to track changes, revert to previous versions if necessary, and manage different branches of development, ensuring code stability and history tracking.
  • community
    With millions of developers and a vast repository of open-source projects, GitHub fosters a robust community where users can contribute to projects, seek help, share knowledge, and collaborate broadly.
  • availability
    GitHub is a cloud-based platform, which means that projects are accessible from anywhere with an internet connection, providing flexibility and convenience to developers globally.
  • documentation
    GitHub allows for comprehensive project documentation through README files, wikis, and GitHub Pages, making it easier for users to understand project context and contribute effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • cost
    While GitHub offers free plans, more advanced features and private repositories come at a cost, which might be a barrier for some individuals or small teams.
  • steep_learning_curve
    For newcomers, especially those unfamiliar with Git, the learning curve can be quite steep, making it challenging to utilize all of GitHub's features effectively.
  • privacy_concerns
    Given its expansive, open nature, users must be cautious with sensitive or proprietary information. Even with private repositories, there is a latent concern over data privacy and security.
  • interface_complexity
    The user interface, while powerful, can be overwhelming and complex for beginners or those not deeply familiar with version control concepts.
  • performance_issues
    Occasionally, GitHub may experience downtime or performance issues, which can disrupt workflow and prevent access to repositories temporarily.
  • limited_storage
    GitHub imposes limitations on storage space and file size within repositories, which can be restrictive for projects requiring large datasets or binaries.
  • Ease of Use
    FileMaker provides a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible for users with limited technical expertise to develop custom applications.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, iOS, and web browsers, allowing users to deploy applications across different operating systems seamlessly.
  • Rapid Development
    FileMaker enables rapid application development with its built-in templates and tools, reducing the time needed to build and deploy custom solutions.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It offers robust integration options with other applications and data sources, including ODBC, SQL, XML, and REST APIs, allowing for expanded functionality and data exchange.
  • Strong Community and Support
    FileMaker has an active user community and extensive support resources, including forums, documentation, and official support from Claris, aiding developers in solving problems and improving skills.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    FileMaker can be costly, particularly for businesses requiring many licenses, as well as for those needing the advanced features available in the higher-tier plans.
  • Scalability
    While suitable for small to medium-sized apps, FileMaker may face challenges in scaling to larger, enterprise-level applications, especially with significant concurrent user demands.
  • Limited Advanced Programming
    FileMaker abstracts much of the programming complexity, which can limit the ability to execute advanced or highly customized programming compared to more traditional development environments.
  • File-based Architecture
    FileMaker uses a file-based system that can sometimes be less efficient than more robust database management systems for certain applications, particularly those needing extensive data analytics or transactional processes.
  • Performance
    Performance may degrade with very large datasets or complex calculations, potentially requiring optimization or limitations on the amount of data handled through the platform.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

GitHub
FileMaker

Overall verdict

  • GitHub is considered an excellent choice for developers and teams looking for a reliable and efficient platform for version control and collaboration. Its community support, extensive documentation, and innovative features make it a preferred choice in the software development community.

Why this product is good

  • GitHub is a widely used platform for version control and collaboration, popular among developers and teams for its robust features, ease of use, and integration capabilities. It allows for streamlined project management, code review, and continuous integration, enhancing productivity and collaborative workflows.

Recommended for

  • Individual developers working on personal projects
  • Software development teams in need of collaborative tools
  • Open-source project maintainers and contributors
  • Organizations looking for scalable version control solutions

Overall verdict

  • FileMaker is considered a good solution for those who need a customizable database and app development platform that can cater to specific business requirements. It is especially beneficial for users who value ease of use, cross-platform support, and the ability to quickly develop and deploy custom applications.

Why this product is good

  • FileMaker is a versatile platform that allows users to create custom apps without extensive programming knowledge. It offers a wide range of templates and tools that assist in building applications tailored to business needs, enhancing productivity and efficiency. The platform integrates well with various services and supports multiple platforms, making it a flexible choice for businesses of different sizes.

Recommended for

    FileMaker is recommended for small to medium-sized businesses, teams that require custom database solutions, and users who lack extensive coding skills but need to develop robust, tailored applications. It is also suitable for organizations looking for a platform that can grow with their needs by offering scalability and integration capabilities.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

GitHub 3 videos + Add
FileMaker 3 videos + Add

How to do coding peer reviews with Github

More videos

  • - Code Review on GitHub
  • - What is GitHub?

Filemaker and Access Review

More videos

  • - What is FileMaker?-FileMaker 16 News-Online FileMaker 16 Video Instruction-FileMaker 16 Videos
  • - FileMaker Platform: How it works

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
GitHub
FileMaker
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub and FileMaker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

GitHub 5.0 · 2 reviews
FileMaker no reviews yet
  • The Essential Platform for Modern Development
    SaaSHub review
    · Aug 2026

    GitHub is an essential platform for modern software development. It makes it easy to host, manage, and collaborate on code while providing powerful tools for version control, project management, and team...

  • Best Forums for Developers to Join in 2025
    www.notchup.com · Dec 2024

    GitHub Discussions is a communication forum for the community around an open source or internal project. Discussions enable fluid, open conversation in a public forum. Discussions are transparent and accessible, but...

  • The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives

    However, like any (human) product, the platform has its limits, downsides, and critics. GitHub has been barred by certain governments, and even if that isn’t exactly the company’s fault, the users are the ones limited...

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

GitHub 2526 mentions
FileMaker 0 mentions
  • Incident with Pull Requests, Git Operations and Issues
    Temporary workaround is to do git config --global url."https://github.com/ git@github.com: so it pushes / pulls using HTTPS when things are back to normal run: git config --global --unset url."https://github.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 8 hours ago
  • Webhook Testing on Localhost: Tunnels, Signatures, and Reliable Replays
    The problem is that the URL has to be reachable from the public internet. During development, your application runs on localhost:3000, behind a home router or an office NAT. GitHub, Stripe, and Slack cannot reach that address. To test... - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
  • How to Download an Entire Website With wget (--mirror Alone Breaks Links)
    Chromium --headless --window-size=1920,1080 --run-all-compositor-stages-before-draw \ --virtual-time-budget=9000 --incognito --dump-dom https://github.com \ | monolith - -I -b https://github.com -o github.html. - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago

View more

Tracking FileMaker since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to GitHub and FileMaker

When comparing GitHub and FileMaker, you can also consider the following products.

  • GitLab

    Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

    Compare GitLab to GitHub or FileMaker:

  • Cryptlex

    Cryptlex is an IT Management software, designed to help you maximize the revenue potential of your software by protecting you against software piracy.

    Compare Cryptlex to GitHub or FileMaker:

  • BitBucket

    Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

    Compare BitBucket to GitHub or FileMaker:

  • Git

    Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

    Compare Git to GitHub or FileMaker:

  • VS Code

    Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

    Compare VS Code to GitHub or FileMaker:

  • Boomi

    The #1 Integration Cloud - Build Integrations anytime, anywhere with no coding required using Dell Boomi's industry leading iPaaS platform.

    Compare Boomi to GitHub or FileMaker: