Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

GitHub VS Fast Elections

Compare GitHub VS Fast Elections and see what are their differences

GitHub

Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Rating
5.0 · 2 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Fast Elections

Run a secret-ballot election in minutes. Voters get a one-time link by email — no accounts, no per-member fees. Free for elections up to 25 voters.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $19 / One-off (Up to 300 voters)
Alternatives Is it good?
Zoviz
Zoviz: Professional Logos, Perfectly Personalized Your Brand. Your Story sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, GitHub seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2495 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2,495 vs 0
Software Development popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 19

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

GitHub
Fast Elections
Website github.com fastelections.com
Pricing
Open source Official pricing
Freemium $19 / One-off (Up to 300 voters) Official pricing
Platforms —
SaaS
Company Startup from the United States · 500 - 999 employees · 2008 Startup from the United States · 2026
Listed in
Software Development Code Collaboration Git Version Control VCS Developers +3
Election Management Voting Online Voting SaaS HOA / Association Management Club Management +3

About GitHub and Fast Elections

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

GitHub
Fast Elections

No description of GitHub yet.

Fast Elections is a web-based, accesible (WCAG 2.1), secret-ballot online voting service for small organizations — clubs, schools, PTAs, HOAs, unions, and small nonprofits — that need a defensible election without government-grade pricing. Organizers can create an election, invite voters, and...

Read more about Fast Elections

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

GitHub 6 features
Fast Elections 12 features
  • collaboration
    GitHub provides a platform for multiple developers to work on the same project concurrently, facilitating collaboration through features like pull requests, code reviews, and issues tracking.
  • integration
    GitHub integrates seamlessly with various third-party tools and services, such as CI/CD pipelines, project management tools, and many development environments, enhancing productivity and workflow efficiency.
  • version_control
    Utilizes Git for version control, allowing users to track changes, revert to previous versions if necessary, and manage different branches of development, ensuring code stability and history tracking.
  • community
    With millions of developers and a vast repository of open-source projects, GitHub fosters a robust community where users can contribute to projects, seek help, share knowledge, and collaborate broadly.
  • availability
    GitHub is a cloud-based platform, which means that projects are accessible from anywhere with an internet connection, providing flexibility and convenience to developers globally.
  • documentation
    GitHub allows for comprehensive project documentation through README files, wikis, and GitHub Pages, making it easier for users to understand project context and contribute effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • cost
    While GitHub offers free plans, more advanced features and private repositories come at a cost, which might be a barrier for some individuals or small teams.
  • steep_learning_curve
    For newcomers, especially those unfamiliar with Git, the learning curve can be quite steep, making it challenging to utilize all of GitHub's features effectively.
  • privacy_concerns
    Given its expansive, open nature, users must be cautious with sensitive or proprietary information. Even with private repositories, there is a latent concern over data privacy and security.
  • interface_complexity
    The user interface, while powerful, can be overwhelming and complex for beginners or those not deeply familiar with version control concepts.
  • performance_issues
    Occasionally, GitHub may experience downtime or performance issues, which can disrupt workflow and prevent access to repositories temporarily.
  • limited_storage
    GitHub imposes limitations on storage space and file size within repositories, which can be restrictive for projects requiring large datasets or binaries.
  • True Secret Ballot
    Protect voter privacy by design with Fast Elections' true secret ballot — cast ballots are stored with no reference back to the voter, timestamps are rounded to the hour, and the roster records only that someone voted, never what they chose.
  • Cast Ballot Confirmation
    Let every voter confirm their ballot was counted — Fast Elections issues a short receipt code at the moment of voting and publishes the full list of codes with the results, so a voter can verify their own ballot without revealing how they voted.
  • Numerous Ballot Options
    Match your bylaws instead of rewriting them — run plurality, pick-N, approval, ranked choice, or yes/no/abstain motions, with write-in candidates and weighted voting by shares, units, or delegation size on every method.
  • Result Transparence
    See exactly how a ranked-choice race was won — Fast Elections shows every instant-runoff round, including who was eliminated and where their votes transferred, so you can put the full count in the minutes.
  • Increase Voter Participation
    Get ballots into inboxes without chasing anyone — send invitations with each voter's unique one-time link, trigger automatic reminders that skip people who already voted, and fix a single bounced address and resend just that ballot instead of starting over.
  • Quick Import of Voter List
    Build your roster in minutes — paste a voter list or import a CSV or XLSX file with problem rows flagged line by line and duplicate emails removed automatically, then tag voters into groups so a question only appears for the chapter, district, or role that should see it.
  • Voter Registration
    Let voters sign themselves up — share a public registration link or a printable QR poster with Fast Elections' self-serve registration, and approve registrants automatically on sign-up or hold each one for an administrator's decision.
  • Multi-Language Support
    Reach every member in their own language — ballots, invitations, reminders, and results emails are available in 10 languages including Spanish, Vietnamese, Simplified Chinese, and Tagalog, translated by hand at no cost or by AI for a $5 add-on.
  • Live Turnout & Publishable Result
    Watch turnout live and publish results the moment polls close — Fast Elections shows how many have voted while the election runs (never partial counts), then delivers per-question results with an optional public link, one-click emailed results to voters, and CSV export for the audit trail.
  • Start & Stop on Your Schedule
    Open and close the polls on schedule — launch immediately or schedule the opening, set an automatic close so nobody has to end the vote at midnight, and extend a running election's end time with automatic reminders rescheduling themselves to match.
  • Flat Price Per Election
    Pay one flat price per election, never per member — Fast Elections is free for elections up to 25 voters and $19 to $99 for larger rosters, with every feature included at every tier and no annual subscription.
  • Multiple Admins Supported
    Run it as an organization, not a one-person project — invite up to 10 administrators, put your logo and accent color on ballots, results, registration pages, and voter emails, and add candidate photos and bios to the ballot, while voters never need to create an account at all.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

GitHub
Fast Elections

Overall verdict

  • GitHub is considered an excellent choice for developers and teams looking for a reliable and efficient platform for version control and collaboration. Its community support, extensive documentation, and innovative features make it a preferred choice in the software development community.

Why this product is good

  • GitHub is a widely used platform for version control and collaboration, popular among developers and teams for its robust features, ease of use, and integration capabilities. It allows for streamlined project management, code review, and continuous integration, enhancing productivity and collaborative workflows.

Recommended for

  • Individual developers working on personal projects
  • Software development teams in need of collaborative tools
  • Open-source project maintainers and contributors
  • Organizations looking for scalable version control solutions

No analysis of Fast Elections yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

GitHub 3 videos + Add
Fast Elections 0 videos + Add

How to do coding peer reviews with Github

More videos

  • - Code Review on GitHub
  • - What is GitHub?

No Fast Elections videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
GitHub
Fast Elections
100% 100%
Software Development
0% 0%
0% 0%
Online Voting
100% 100%
100% 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0%
0% 0%
Election Management
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing GitHub and Fast Elections.

What makes your product unique?

Fast Elections's answer:

Fast Elections is real election software built for the volunteer who runs one vote a year.

The secret ballot is architectural, not a promise. A cast ballot is stored as a standalone record with no reference back to the voter and only an hour-rounded timestamp, so it can't be tied to a person or narrowed down by when it arrived. Voting links are single-use and only their hash is ever stored, so even a read of the database can't reconstruct a working link. We can't connect a ballot to a voter either — and we publish how it works instead of just asserting it.

Voters can check the count themselves. Every voter gets a receipt code and can find that code in the published results.

Pricing is one flat charge per election, sized to the roster, with every feature included at every tier — free up to 25 voters, then $19, $49, or $99. No per-member seats, no annual contract, nothing to cancel.

Voters never create an account. They get a one-time link by email, vote, and get a receipt. Organizers can also share a link or a printable QR poster and let voters register themselves.

The ballot methods are the serious ones: plurality and pick-N, ranked choice (instant-runoff, with every elimination round shown), approval voting, and yes/no/abstain motions — plus write-ins, weighted votes for share- or unit-based memberships, and per-question eligibility for segmented ballots. Ballots and voter emails run in 10 languages.

And it's one founder, not a call center. The person who wrote the counting code answers the support mail, within one business day.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Fast Elections's answer:

Price and scope. Most election platforms are built for governments or large enterprises and priced accordingly — per-member seats, annual contracts, quotes, or a sales call. Fast Elections charges once per election based on roster size: free up to 25 voters, $19 up to 300, $49 up to 1,000, $99 up to 5,000. That's a number a volunteer treasurer can approve without a board vote, and it doesn't recur when your club isn't voting.

No feature gating. Ranked choice, approval voting, weighted votes, write-ins, custom branding, multi-language ballots, self-serve voter registration, up to 10 administrators — all included at every tier, including the free one. Competitors routinely put ranked choice or branding behind a higher plan.

Setup in minutes, not a project. Paste or import your roster from CSV or Excel, write your questions, and launch. Voters need no account and nothing to install.

Trust you can show your members. Receipt codes let each voter verify their own ballot is in the published count, and instant-runoff results display every elimination round rather than just a winner — so you can answer "how did that come out?" at the meeting.

Support from the builder. Not a ticket queue: the founder who designed and wrote the software reads the mail and answers within one business day.

Worth saying plainly: this is not built for government or enterprise-scale elections. If you need a certified public-sector election system, buy one. If you're a club, PTA, HOA, union local, or small nonprofit running an honest internal vote, this is built for exactly you.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Fast Elections's answer:

Small, volunteer-run organizations that hold one to a few elections a year and have no IT department: garden and social clubs, PTAs, student governments and school clubs, homeowners' and condo associations, union locals, professional associations, churches, and small nonprofits.

The person who signs up is usually a secretary, treasurer, board chair, or election committee volunteer — someone who has been running the vote on paper or in a survey tool, is losing an evening to counting, and needs a secret ballot the membership will actually trust. Typical rosters run from a couple dozen to a few thousand voters; the platform tops out at 5,000 per election.

Fast Elections is deliberately not built for government or enterprise-scale elections.

What's the story behind your product?

Fast Elections's answer:

Serious election software is usually built for governments — and priced for them. But the groups that actually run the most elections are garden clubs, PTAs, student governments, HOAs, union locals, and small nonprofits. They end up choosing between a survey tool that can't keep a ballot secret and a paper count that eats an evening. Either way, somebody at the meeting eventually asks whether the result can be trusted.

Fast Elections was built by Votivigy LLC to be the honest middle: a real secret ballot, a receipt each voter can verify for themselves, ranked choice that shows its rounds, and a price a volunteer treasurer can approve without a procurement process. Charging once per election, sized to the roster, follows from the same idea — that's when the work happens, so that's when you pay. No seats, no annual contract, no renewal you forget to cancel.

Votivigy LLC is Jason Cline. He designed Fast Elections, wrote the software that runs it, and reads the mail that comes to jason@fastelections.com. When you ask why a tally came out the way it did, the answer comes from the person who built the counting.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Fast Elections's answer:

Frontend: TypeScript, Vue 3, Vuetify 4, Vite, Vue Router, and vue-i18n, with marketing pages prerendered via vite-ssg.

Backend: fully serverless on AWS.

Payments: Stripe Checkout with signature-verified webhooks.

The serverless choice is deliberate — it costs almost nothing while idle, which is what makes a $19 election economically possible.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Fast Elections's answer:

Fast Elections serves small, volunteer-run member organizations — clubs, PTAs, HOAs, student governments, union locals, and small nonprofits — running internal votes. We don't publish customer names without permission, and as a young product we don't yet have public reference customers to list.

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub and Fast Elections. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

GitHub 5.0 · 2 reviews
Fast Elections no reviews yet
  • The Essential Platform for Modern Development
    SaaSHub review
    · Aug 2026

    GitHub is an essential platform for modern software development. It makes it easy to host, manage, and collaborate on code while providing powerful tools for version control, project management, and team...

  • Best Forums for Developers to Join in 2025
    www.notchup.com · Dec 2024

    GitHub Discussions is a communication forum for the community around an open source or internal project. Discussions enable fluid, open conversation in a public forum. Discussions are transparent and accessible, but...

  • The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
    www.wearedevelopers.com · Jun 2024

    However, like any (human) product, the platform has its limits, downsides, and critics. GitHub has been barred by certain governments, and even if that isn’t exactly the company’s fault, the users are the ones limited...

View more

We have no reviews of Fast Elections yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

GitHub 2495 mentions
Fast Elections 0 mentions
  • How to Deploy a React + Vite Project to GitHub Pages and Vercel (Beginner-Friendly Guide)
    Git remote add origin https://github.com/YOUR-USERNAME/my-react-app.git. - Source: dev.to / about 11 hours ago
  • ChatGPT work is down: Could not resolve host: github.com
    Am I the only one? Started a new work chat in ChatGPT to work on my public GitHub project, it reports: 
        fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/':.
    - Source: Hacker News / about 18 hours ago
  • New gTLD Application for .lan
    Then why hasn't there been a gTLD reserved for local use? The only ones that are reserved are .local and .home.arpa. .local is out, since it is entirely for use with mDNS / Bonjour. That leaves .home.arpa, which is very awkward.... - Source: Hacker News / 1 day ago

View more

Tracking Fast Elections since Aug 2026.

Alternatives to GitHub and Fast Elections

When comparing GitHub and Fast Elections, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...