
GitLab
BitBucket
VS Code
Git
CodePen
Node.js
Stack Overflow
Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Raindrop.io
Wayback Machine
wallabag
Archive.org
HTTrack
Pinboard
SiteSucker
The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, GitHub seems to be a lot more popular than ArchiveBox. While we know about 2531 links to GitHub, we've tracked only 96 mentions of ArchiveBox.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | archivebox.io |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States · 500 - 999 employees · 2008 | 2017 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of GitHub yet.
ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How to do coding peer reviews with Github
More videos
Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing GitHub and ArchiveBox.
ArchiveBox's answer:
ArchiveBox's answer:
ArchiveBox's answer:
ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.
Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.
Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.
Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.
Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.
ArchiveBox's answer:
ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.
ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.
If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.
If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.
If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.
ArchiveBox's answer:
Share your experience with using GitHub and ArchiveBox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


GitHub is an essential platform for modern software development. It makes it easy to host, manage, and collaborate on code while providing powerful tools for version control, project management, and team...
GitHub Discussions is a communication forum for the community around an open source or internal project. Discussions enable fluid, open conversation in a public forum. Discussions are transparent and accessible, but...
However, like any (human) product, the platform has its limits, downsides, and critics. GitHub has been barred by certain governments, and even if that isn’t exactly the company’s fault, the users are the ones limited...
We have no reviews of ArchiveBox yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Constraining arguments. Bash(curl http://github.com/ *) misses curl -L, https://, and variables. Deny the network tools and use WebFetch(domain:...) rules instead. - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
Git clone https://github.com//switch.git && cd switch Just init-env # writes .env with freshly generated secrets, prints the admin login Uv sync --project core # Python packages for switch-core (the project lives in... - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
Api=http://127.0.0.1:3082/orchestrator/api H='x-orchestrator-request: 1' # 1. Source: repository + agent CLI (runs the setup check; restarts on success) Curl -s -X PUT -H "$H" -H 'content-type: application/json'... - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
Wholeheartedly agree. It's sad to slowly see the bitrot in my own bookmarks, trying to pull up important resources or media from only a few years ago only to hit a 404 or domain placeholder. And many times there is nothing on Archive.org... - Source: Hacker News / 6 days ago
Are you aware of ArchiveBox? https://archivebox.io/ What does Hister do differently? Search seems like a major differentiator, I'm wondering if leveraging the existing archivebox project for archival and implementing good search on top... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
When comparing GitHub and ArchiveBox, you can also consider the following products.

Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Compare GitLab to GitHub or ArchiveBox:

All your articles, photos, video & content from web & apps in one place.
Compare Raindrop.io to GitHub or ArchiveBox:

Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Compare BitBucket to GitHub or ArchiveBox:

Browse through over 150 billion web pages archived from 1996 to a few months ago.
Compare Wayback Machine to GitHub or ArchiveBox:

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft
Compare VS Code to GitHub or ArchiveBox:
