GitHub Copilot
Cursor
Windsurf Editor
replit
Codeium
Claude Code
Tabnine
Amazon CodeWhisperer
Clearbit
Lusha
DiscoverOrg
Apollo.io
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
Trained on billions of lines of public code, GitHub Copilot puts the knowledge you need at your fingertips, saving you time and helping you stay focused.
GitHub Copilot ClearbitIt definitely increases my productivity.
Based on our record, GitHub Copilot seems to be a lot more popular than Clearbit. While we know about 387 links to GitHub Copilot, we've tracked only 18 mentions of Clearbit. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Where llms.txt genuinely gets read is a different layer: coding and agent tooling โ Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf โ pulling a documentation site's pages with less token waste, plus emerging agent protocols like OpenAI's Agents SDK. That's real, and it's growing fast. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
You need an active GitHub Copilot subscription. Plans are available at individual, business, and enterprise tiers at github.com/features/copilot. Once active, all tools use your GitHub account credentials. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
For over a decade PhpStorm (starting in my WordPress era) and later WebStorm have been my main IDEs for web development. So when GitHub Copilot launched, it was a natural choice to try it out in WebStorm. It was one of the first AI coding tools I used, and it had a big impact on how I thought about AI-assisted coding. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Before we get into it, there are some things about AI usage worth addressing. I've had my fair share of scepticism in the past, but recent model releases have made it increasingly difficult to argue that AI isn't a viable tool for the majority of workstreams, including building user interfaces. Most large language models are trained on public data scraped from the internet, which means your internal design system... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Most developers still treat GitHub Copilot like a very good autocomplete engine. That's useful, but it's not the real unlock. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug โ legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it canโt handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Cursor - The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
Windsurf Editor - Tomorrow's editor, today. Windsurf Editor is the first AI agent-powered IDE that keeps developers in the flow. Available today on Mac, Windows, and Linux.
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.
replit - Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages โ without spending a second on setup.
Apollo.io - Apolloโs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.