Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Git2Go VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Git2Go VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Git2Go logo Git2Go

The Git client for iPhone and iPad you always wanted

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • Git2Go Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-07
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

Git2Go features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Git2Go offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface that is suitable for both beginners and experienced users, enhancing productivity.
  • Mobile Accessibility
    It allows users to manage Git repositories directly from their iOS devices, providing flexibility to work on the go.
  • Repository Management
    The app supports all basic Git operations such as cloning, committing, pushing, and pulling, facilitating comprehensive management of repositories.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Git2Go can easily integrate with other tools and services, improving workflow efficiency by connecting with existing systems.

Possible disadvantages of Git2Go

  • Platform Limitation
    The app is only available on iOS devices, excluding users who prefer Android or other operating systems from using it.
  • Limited Features Compared to Desktop
    The mobile version may not support all the advanced functionalities available in desktop Git clients, potentially hindering users needing those features.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users might experience slower performance when handling large repositories due to mobile hardware limitations.
  • Internet Dependence
    An active internet connection is often required to perform certain actions, which may limit usability in offline scenarios.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Git2Go videos

How Git2Go works on your iPad

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Git2Go and Commit Together by Github)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Git2Go and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Git2Go mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Git2Go yet. Tracking of Git2Go recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Git2Go and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

Working Copy - The powerful Git client for iOS

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

CodeHub - CodeHub is the most complete, unofficial, client for GitHub on the iOS platform.

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom

GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful