Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CodeHub VS Commit Together by Github

Compare CodeHub VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Fileport
The fastest way to send files over the internet featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

CodeHub logo CodeHub

CodeHub is the most complete, unofficial, client for GitHub on the iOS platform.

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • CodeHub Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-01
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

CodeHub features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    CodeHub provides a clean and intuitive interface that enhances the user experience, making it easier for users to navigate and manage their repositories.
  • GitHub Integration
    The app seamlessly integrates with GitHub, allowing users to access and manage their GitHub repositories directly from their mobile device.
  • Mobile Code Review
    Users can conduct code reviews on-the-go, which adds convenience for developers needing to perform reviews away from a computer.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source promotes transparency and allows developers to contribute to its improvement, fostering community engagement.

Possible disadvantages of CodeHub

  • Limited Platform Support
    CodeHub is primarily available for iOS, which limits access for Android users and other platforms.
  • Restricted Functionality
    The mobile environment imposes restrictions, potentially lacking some advanced features available in full desktop versions of GitHub clients.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report occasional performance slowdowns or glitches, which can affect productivity and overall user satisfaction.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    As CodeHub is focused on GitHub integration, it may not be suitable for developers who use other platforms or version control systems.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeHub and Commit Together by Github)

CodeHub

Commit Together by Github

Git
100 100%
Git
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeHub and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Commit Together by Github might be a bit more popular than CodeHub. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to CodeHub. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeHub mentions (1)

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeHub and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

Working Copy - The powerful Git client for iOS

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

Diff So Fancy - Make Git diffs look good

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom

Git Flow - Git Flow is a very self-explanatory free software workflow for managing Git branches.

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Loading...