giscus VS File Split Join

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, giscus seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 33 times since March 2021.

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

	giscus	File Split Join
Website	giscus.app	whatsoftware.com
Pricing	Open source	—
Listed in	Social Networks Project Management Feedback Commenting Service +1	Cloud Storage Code Coverage Note Taking Other +1

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

giscus 5 features

File Split Join 0 features

GitHub Integration
Giscus leverages GitHub Discussions for comment management, which means that it inherits all the collaborative features and ecosystem integration of GitHub.
Privacy-Focused
Since it uses GitHub for comments, Giscus does not track users or show ads, making it a more privacy-friendly alternative to other commenting systems.
Open Source
Giscus is open-source, allowing developers to inspect the code, contribute to its development, and ensure that there are no hidden functionalities.
Easy Integration
Adding Giscus to a website is straightforward and well-documented, requiring minimal effort to get up and running.
Markdown Support
Comments in Giscus support Markdown, which allows users to format their messages easily and include features like code snippets.

Possible disadvantages

GitHub Account Requirement
Users need a GitHub account to participate in discussions, which might limit engagement from non-developer audiences or those unwilling to create an account.
Dependency on GitHub
The system is heavily dependent on the availability and reliability of GitHub's services, making it vulnerable to outages or changes in GitHub's API.
Potential Complexity
The need to manage comments through GitHub Discussions might introduce complexity for users who are unfamiliar with GitHub's interface.
Limited Customization
Customization options for the appearance and behavior of the comment section are less extensive compared to some other commenting platforms.
No Anonymous Comments
The requirement for a GitHub account means that anonymous commenting is not an option, which might deter some users from participating.

No features have been listed yet.

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100

giscus

File Split Join

100% 100%

0% 0%

100% 100%

0% 0%

100% 100%

Share your experience with using giscus and File Split Join. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

giscus 33 mentions

File Split Join 0 mentions

Leave a Trace
Maybe giscus https://giscus.app/ It works for static sites, you just need to embed their script, and spam and moderation would be handled by GitHub. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Don't rent the cloud, own instead
Look the bottom of that page: An error occurred: API rate limit already exceeded for installation ID 73591946. Error from https://giscus.app/ Fellow says one thing and uses another. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Disqus Turned My Blog into an Ad Farm – So I Killed It
I did the same. I was sad to lose the comments, but the ads were awful and I don't particularly want someone elses ads / tracking on my hobby site. I switched to gisqus [1], which is powered by GitHub discussions, which seems to be... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

Tracking File Split Join since Mar 2021.

When comparing giscus and File Split Join, you can also consider the following products.