Software Alternatives & Startups

GhostText.app VS git-sizer

Compare GhostText.app VS git-sizer and see what are their differences

GhostText.app

Ghost Text - Text Recognition, Reinvented. Extract unselectable text from anywhere on your screen instantly.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Free trial $4.99 / One-off
git-sizer

Compute various size metrics for a Git repository, flagging those that might cause problems - github/git-sizer

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, git-sizer seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
Swift Programming popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

GhostText.app
git-sizer
Website ghosttext.app github.com
Pricing
Free trial $4.99 / One-off Official pricing
—
Platforms
MacOS
—
Company Startup from India · 2025 —
Listed in

About GhostText.app and git-sizer

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

GhostText.app
git-sizer

What Ghost Text Can Do Screen OCR — Capture text from anywhere on your screen instantly using macOS's built-in Vision framework 100% Offline — All OCR processing happens locally on your Mac — your data never leaves your device Menu Bar Access — Always ready from your macOS menu bar with one click...

Read more about GhostText.app

No description of git-sizer yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

GhostText.app 5 features
git-sizer 5 features
  • Browser-to-editor synchronization
    GhostText allows you to connect text areas in your browser directly to your preferred code editor, enabling real-time two-way synchronization so you can write and edit text using a full-featured editor instead of a basic browser text box.
  • Supports multiple editors
    GhostText is compatible with several popular code editors including VS Code, Sublime Text, Neovim, and others, giving users flexibility to work with their preferred development environment.
  • Free and open source
    GhostText is an open-source project available for free, meaning users can inspect the code, contribute to its development, and use it without any licensing costs.
  • Syntax highlighting and editor features
    By routing text editing through a full code editor, users gain access to syntax highlighting, auto-completion, linting, and other powerful editor features that are not available in standard browser text areas.
  • Cross-browser support
    GhostText offers browser extensions for major browsers including Chrome and Firefox, making it accessible to a wide range of users regardless of their browser preference.

Possible disadvantages

  • Setup complexity
    Using GhostText requires installing both a browser extension and an editor plugin, then ensuring they connect properly, which can be a somewhat involved setup process for non-technical users.
  • Limited to text areas
    GhostText primarily works with standard HTML text areas and may not function correctly with all web-based editors, rich text editors, or custom content-editable elements found on modern websites.
  • Connection reliability
    The WebSocket-based connection between the browser and editor can occasionally drop or fail to establish, requiring users to reconnect or restart the extension, which can interrupt workflow.
  • Niche use case
    The tool serves a relatively narrow audience—primarily developers and writers who frequently edit code or long-form text in browser fields—limiting its broad appeal and community size.
  • Maintenance and updates
    As an open-source project with a small team, updates and bug fixes may not come as frequently as with commercial software, and compatibility issues with new browser or editor versions can sometimes take time to resolve.
  • Comprehensive Repository Analysis
    git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
  • Easy to Use
    The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
  • Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
    It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
  • Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
    Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
  • Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
    It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Automatic Remediation
    git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
  • Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
    While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
  • Limited to Local Analysis
    The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
  • No Real-Time Monitoring
    It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
  • Command-Line Only Interface
    The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

GhostText.app
git-sizer

Overall verdict

  • GhostText.app appears to be a browser extension/tool that lets you edit text from web page input fields using your favorite external text editor, syncing changes in real-time. It's generally considered a useful productivity tool for writers and developers who prefer working in a dedicated editor rather than small browser text boxes, though its usefulness depends on your specific workflow and editor compatibility.

Why this product is good

  • Enables real-time syncing between browser text fields and a preferred external text editor
  • Useful for writing in a more comfortable environment with better editing features, spell-check, and shortcuts
  • Lightweight and focused on a single, specific task without unnecessary bloat
  • Supports multiple popular text editors through plugins/extensions
  • Free to use for most core functionality

Recommended for

  • Writers who prefer composing in a dedicated text editor before pasting into web forms
  • Developers who write code snippets or documentation in browser-based tools like GitHub or forums
  • Bloggers and content creators who want better editing tools than basic browser textareas
  • Users who frequently switch between browser input fields and desktop editors
  • People who want to leverage editor-specific features like syntax highlighting or macros while writing online

Overall verdict

  • git-sizer is a solid, focused open-source tool that effectively analyzes Git repositories to identify size and structural issues that could cause performance problems or hosting limits, making it a valuable diagnostic utility for repository maintenance.

Why this product is good

  • Quickly identifies large blobs, deep histories, and other repository bloat issues that impact performance
  • Simple command-line tool with no complex setup or dependencies required
  • Provides clear, actionable metrics about repository size and structure
  • Backed by GitHub, ensuring credibility and ongoing relevance to Git ecosystem needs
  • Helps proactively catch issues before they cause problems with hosting platforms or clone/fetch performance
  • Open source and actively maintained with community input

Recommended for

  • Repository administrators managing large or growing codebases
  • Teams migrating repositories to new hosting platforms with size limits
  • Developers troubleshooting slow clone, fetch, or checkout operations
  • DevOps engineers auditing repository health before major infrastructure changes
  • Organizations enforcing repository size policies or best practices
  • Anyone dealing with repositories that have accumulated large binary files or excessive history over time

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
GhostText.app
git-sizer
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
Git
100% 100%
100% 100%
Mac
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using GhostText.app and git-sizer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

GhostText.app 0 mentions
git-sizer 1 mention

Tracking GhostText.app since Apr 2026.

  • how to keep github repos small?
    Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to GhostText.app and git-sizer

When comparing GhostText.app and git-sizer, you can also consider the following products.