Software Alternatives & Startups

Get Shit Done VS git-sizer

Compare Get Shit Done VS git-sizer and see what are their differences

Get Shit Done

Free Bootstrap 3 UI kit

Rating
0 reviews
git-sizer

Compute various size metrics for a Git repository, flagging those that might cause problems - github/git-sizer

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, git-sizer seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
Design Tools popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Get Shit Done
git-sizer
Website creative-tim.com github.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Get Shit Done 5 features
git-sizer 5 features
  • Comprehensive UI Components
    Get Shit Done provides a wide range of UI components that can help developers quickly build beautiful and functional interfaces without starting from scratch.
  • Customization
    The kit offers customization options, allowing developers to adapt the components to fit their specific project needs and design requirements.
  • Responsive Design
    The components are designed to be responsive, ensuring that applications built with this kit will look good on a variety of devices and screen sizes.
  • Time-Saving
    By providing pre-designed components, the kit saves developers time in the design and implementation phases of their projects.
  • Open-source Offering
    Being an open-source product, it allows developers to contribute to the repository and benefit from community improvements and bug fixes.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Bootstrap
    The kit is heavily based on Bootstrap, which might limit flexibility for developers who prefer or require a different frontend framework.
  • Learning Curve
    New users or those unfamiliar with Bootstrap may face a learning curve when trying to understand and effectively use the kit’s components.
  • Potential Overhead
    Including a comprehensive style kit might add unnecessary code to projects, especially if only a small portion of the components are actually used.
  • Design Consistency Limitations
    While customization is possible, achieving a highly unique or non-standard design may prove challenging without significant modifications.
  • Maintenance
    As the web evolves, relying on third-party UI kits requires keeping track of updates and ensuring compatibility, which can add to maintenance efforts.
  • Comprehensive Repository Analysis
    git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
  • Easy to Use
    The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
  • Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
    It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
  • Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
    Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
  • Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
    It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Automatic Remediation
    git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
  • Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
    While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
  • Limited to Local Analysis
    The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
  • No Real-Time Monitoring
    It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
  • Command-Line Only Interface
    The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Get Shit Done
git-sizer

No analysis of Get Shit Done yet.

Overall verdict

  • git-sizer is a solid, focused open-source tool that effectively analyzes Git repositories to identify size and structural issues that could cause performance problems or hosting limits, making it a valuable diagnostic utility for repository maintenance.

Why this product is good

  • Quickly identifies large blobs, deep histories, and other repository bloat issues that impact performance
  • Simple command-line tool with no complex setup or dependencies required
  • Provides clear, actionable metrics about repository size and structure
  • Backed by GitHub, ensuring credibility and ongoing relevance to Git ecosystem needs
  • Helps proactively catch issues before they cause problems with hosting platforms or clone/fetch performance
  • Open source and actively maintained with community input

Recommended for

  • Repository administrators managing large or growing codebases
  • Teams migrating repositories to new hosting platforms with size limits
  • Developers troubleshooting slow clone, fetch, or checkout operations
  • DevOps engineers auditing repository health before major infrastructure changes
  • Organizations enforcing repository size policies or best practices
  • Anyone dealing with repositories that have accumulated large binary files or excessive history over time

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Get Shit Done 3 videos + Add
git-sizer 0 videos + Add

How To Get Shit Done! (Productivity Boost)

More videos

  • - Mi Goals Get Shit Done Checklist Notebook and Dot Grid Notebook Review
  • - How to Get Shit Done - Joe Soto Interviews Jeffrey Gitomer

No git-sizer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Get Shit Done
git-sizer
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
Git
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Get Shit Done and git-sizer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Get Shit Done 0 mentions
git-sizer 1 mention

Tracking Get Shit Done since Mar 2021.

  • how to keep github repos small?
    Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to Get Shit Done and git-sizer

When comparing Get Shit Done and git-sizer, you can also consider the following products.