GDevelop Reviews

1. kio

   · none at none · about 1 year ago

   awesome, but contains some bugs like frezees or editor view crash

   🏁 Competitors: Godot Engine

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Easy user interface|Easy to setup|Open-source|Anyone can upload

   👎 Cons:    Bugs|Freezes|Slow on android device|Paid plans|Little slow

Textures.com Reviews

GDevelop mentions (78)

• No-Code Game Development: Using AI to Build Your First Game

  GDevelop combines open-source flexibility with powerful no-code features. Their recent AI plugins provide remarkable capabilities:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Ask HN: Platform for 11 year old to create video games?

  Humble Bundle has a Godot bundle is available for the next day or so. That might be a good one to look at if you're ok with leaning into code a bit (gdscript is very very similar to python). https://www.humblebundle.com/software/learn-godot-43-complete-course-bundle-software Also check out the RPG Maker bundle. That's pretty point-and-click. You can have something basic up and running in a couple minutes... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Exploring Raylib and Open Source

  I selected this library as I normally use much higher-level tools to develop games such as p5.js, or GDevelop. Both these tools are amazing in their own right; however, I want to learn how these processes operate on a much lower level. These tools take care of a lot of issues for you ranging from asset to memory management. Raylib is still cross-platform but does not handle these tasks for the programmer which I... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Unity’s New Pricing: A Wake-Up Call on the Importance of Open Source in Gaming

  It's not as monolithic as you'd think. There are lots of engines out there but their communities aren't very vocal compared to Unity, Unreal, and especially Godot's community. Take a look at: https://itch.io/game-development/engines/most-projects And https://www.gamedeveloper.com/blogs/the-generous-space-of-alternative-game-engines-a-curation- If you look at both of these you'll see just how many engines there are... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

• Ask HN: Favorite Game Engine?

  I'm not really a game maker, but would like to give a shout out to the fabulous https://gdevelop.io/ It has everything you need, is free and its VISUAL PROGRAMMING is fab... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

Textures.com mentions (179)

• 🧐 Textures.com - The site where the Mh370 cloud photos were traced back to says there is something odd with their audited logs. Rule 2: Discussion must be on-topic.

  Been using textures.com for a very long time, they are awesome, so all the best to them! Source: over 2 years ago

• The clouds in Jonas' photos match the clouds in the satellite footage of the same area on January 25th, 2012

  Everybody needs to take a deep breath because something reeks about the Jonas debunk. He may have been manipulated to find altered photos integrated into his legitimate data set. Check out this post today by Textures.com from a post today on X. Also... Another post by Ken S (@KStaubin) today calls into question the legitimacy of the data set. Source: over 2 years ago

• Jonas, the individual who claims to have taken the "original" cloud pics admits to photo manipulation in the past. Opposition is attacking the videos. We are in the thick of it. More to come later.

  Above, you say it's shady that Jonas is business partners with the texture.com owner, when he literally took photos of those clouds for textures.com, which makes him a business partner. That's why the photos came to exist in the first place. Source: over 2 years ago

• If the video is a hoax, why would some agency create this video in 2014?

  Video being real, clouds planted by the CIA later except for the 2 or 3 found on archive.org (or maybe they hacked into archive.org), person working for textures.com on twitter is a plant, stock footage altered after the fact to look vaguely like the video. Jonas is a plant. Ashton Forbes is a plant to make the believers look like idiots. Source: over 2 years ago

• The Aerials0028 image did not get archived in 2012. Here is an explanation. Decide for yourself.

  We can also confirm the photo was on the website as soon as it was re-launched as textures.com in 2016. All of the other images on the website appeared at that time, it was not that single image being uploaded. Source: over 2 years ago