FullCalendar VS Commit Together by Github

• Comprehensive Features
  FullCalendar offers a wide range of features like drag-and-drop event management, customizable views (month, week, day), recurring events, and timezone support.
• Extensibility
  The library is highly extensible with various plugins and options to add additional functionalities like Google Calendar integration and resource management.
• Responsive Design
  FullCalendar is built with a responsive design in mind, ensuring that the calendar looks good and operates smoothly on both desktop and mobile devices.
• Documentation
  FullCalendar offers comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and examples that help developers understand how to implement and customize the calendar.
• Community Support
  It has a robust community and active support forums, making it easier to find solutions to common problems and share customization tips.
• Performance
  Optimized for fast rendering and efficient use of resources, ensuring high performance even with a large number of events.

Possible disadvantages

• Complexity
  Due to its extensive feature set, FullCalendar can be complex to implement and may require a steep learning curve, especially for beginners.
• Cost
  While the core library is free, some advanced features and plugins require a paid license, which might be a constraint for small projects or individual developers.
• Customization Overhead
  Highly specific customizations can be cumbersome, requiring detailed changes and in-depth knowledge of the library's API.
• Browser Compatibility
  Though generally robust, some users have reported issues with browser-specific bugs, requiring additional testing and fixes.
• Dependency Management
  FullCalendar relies on other libraries like Moment.js (though moving away from it), which can lead to dependency management issues in larger projects.

• Enhanced Collaboration
  Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
• Improved Code Review Process
  With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
• Accountability
  By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
• Efficiency in Pair Programming
  When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Commit History
  Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
• Potential Workflow Conflicts
  Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
• Initial Setup Overhead
  Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
• Tooling Compatibility
  Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Episode #042 - FullCalendar Events and Scheduling

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Opencloud – an alternative to Nextcloud written in Go

  There are dozens of open source Google calendar clones in JS; picking a random not-react example off of the front page of an npm search: https://fullcalendar.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

• Frontend Libraries for Your Next Project

  FullCalendar is an exhaustive calendar library offering extensive customization options. It supports features like dragging, resizing, and event handling, making it ideal for scheduling applications. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Is Temporal still temporal?

  The only complexity with Temporal is the size of the polyfill. However, an alternative polyfill has been in development for some time now — temporal-polyfill by FullCalendar. Its size is much more appealing: 60.7 kB to 21.7 kB (gzip).... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

View more

• Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?

  There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago