Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Frill VS DevTest

Compare Frill VS DevTest and see what are their differences

you.bot
One API for 80+ AI models โ€” LLM, image, video & music โ€” priced up to 80% below the official APIs. Pay only for successful calls; failed runs refunded; credits never expire. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Frill logo Frill

A better way to collect customer feedback

DevTest logo DevTest

Test management solution for efficient quality assurance
  • Frill Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20
  • DevTest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-15

Frill features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    Frill offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface, making it accessible for users of all experience levels.
  • Customizable Boards
    Users can customize their feedback boards to align with their brand's aesthetics and requirements, providing a more personalized experience.
  • Feature Prioritization
    Frill enables teams to prioritize suggestions and feedback, helping to focus on the most impactful changes and enhancements.
  • Integration with Popular Tools
    Frill integrates seamlessly with other popular tools and platforms, such as Slack, Zapier, and Intercom, promoting better workflow efficiency.
  • Public and Private Boards
    Frill allows for the creation of both public and private boards, giving flexibility in sharing feedback and ideas internally or with customers.

Possible disadvantages of Frill

  • Cost
    Frill offers various pricing plans, which might be expensive for small businesses or startups with limited budgets.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    While Frill is user-friendly, it may lack some advanced features required by larger enterprises with more complex feedback management needs.
  • Dependency on Integrations
    For full functionality, users may rely heavily on integrations with other tools, which can be a limitation if those tools are not already in use.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    Despite its user-friendly nature, there might be a slight learning curve for users to fully customize their boards and utilize all features effectively.
  • Limited Analytics
    The platform might offer limited in-depth analytics compared to specialized feedback analysis tools, which can be a drawback for data-driven decision-making.

DevTest features and specs

  • Cost Management
    Azure DevTest Labs helps you control costs by allowing you to set policies such as auto-shutdown and budget limits. This ensures that resources are not unnecessarily consumed, reducing wastage and managing expenditure efficiently.
  • Quick Provisioning
    The service offers rapid creation of testing environments, enabling developers to quickly set up and tear down environments as needed. This speeds up the development cycle and reduces the time to market.
  • Preconfigured Templates
    Azure DevTest Labs provides a variety of preconfigured templates that help in setting up environments more easily and consistently. This standardization reduces errors and simplifies the management of testing conditions.
  • Integration with CI/CD
    The service supports integration with continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. This allows for better automation and efficiency, reducing manual intervention and improving reliability.
  • Resource Management
    It offers detailed resource management features, allowing you to allocate CPU, memory, and storage based on the needs of the specific environment. This granular control helps in optimizing the use of resources.

Possible disadvantages of DevTest

  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring DevTest Labs can be complex, requiring a good understanding of Azure services and architecture. This can be a challenge for smaller teams with limited expertise.
  • Limited Support for Non-Azure Environments
    The service is primarily designed for Azure-based resources, which makes it less effective for multi-cloud or hybrid cloud strategies. This limitation could be a constraint for organizations looking for a more versatile solution.
  • Cost Overruns
    While cost management features are available, improper configuration or lack of monitoring can still lead to cost overruns. This requires active management to ensure budgets are adhered to.
  • Dependency on Azure Ecosystem
    The service is deeply integrated with the Azure ecosystem, making it less flexible for those who are using other cloud providers or on-premises solutions. This dependency can limit the ability to diversify cloud strategy.
  • Learning Curve
    There can be a steep learning curve for new users who are not familiar with the Azure platform. This could potentially slow down the adoption and effective utilization of the service.

Analysis of Frill

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Frill.co is a good choice for businesses looking for a streamlined way to handle product feedback and manage their development process. Its intuitive interface and comprehensive features make it a valuable tool for both small and medium-sized businesses aiming to improve their product offerings based on customer insights.

Why this product is good

  • Frill.co is a product feedback and roadmap tool designed to help companies gather and manage customer feedback more effectively. It provides features like idea boards, where users can submit and vote on ideas, roadmaps to keep track of development progress, and changelogs to announce updates. These tools can enhance customer engagement and ensure product development aligns with user needs.

Recommended for

    Frill.co is particularly recommended for product managers, SaaS companies, and startups looking to prioritize and manage user feedback effectively. It is also beneficial for teams looking to enhance customer interaction and transparency by clearly communicating product development progress and updates.

Analysis of DevTest

Overall verdict

  • Yes, DevTest Labs is generally considered a good tool for development and testing environments on Azure.

Why this product is good

  • DevTest Labs provides a scalable and cost-effective solution for organizations to quickly set up testing environments on Microsoft Azure. It offers features such as automated VM provisioning, reusable templates, cost tracking, and integration with CI/CD pipelines, which enhances productivity and resource management. Additionally, it simplifies the management of development environments, reduces waste, and controls costs effectively.

Recommended for

    DevTest Labs is recommended for development teams and organizations that need to manage multiple testing or development environments. It's ideal for teams that want to automate their environment provisioning, manage costs, and streamline their DevOps workflows in the cloud. Organizations using Azure as their primary cloud infrastructure will particularly benefit from its seamless integration with other Azure services.

Frill videos

+ Add

Frill review | Collect Your Customer Feedback

More videos:

  • Review - LA Colors Nail Frill review
  • Review - Bass Fishing Review Chasebaits Frill Seeker Wakebait

DevTest videos

+ Add

AZ-900 Episode 18 | Azure DevOps Solutions | Azure DevOps, DevTest Labs

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Frill and DevTest)

Frill

DevTest

Customer Feedback
100 100%
Customer Feedback
0% 0
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100
User Feedback
100 100%
User Feedback
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Frill and DevTest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Frill and DevTest

Frill Reviews

  1. Denis Anisimov
    ยท CTO at Introwise ยท
    Easy to embed and customize

    We are using Frill to collect user feedback and feature requests, as well as post announcements about new feature updates to our users.

    I love how easy it was to connect Frill with our own system, including SSO support for seamless users authentication. We also integrated the Frill widget right into our product user's dashboard so it's easy to distribute announcements and collect new feature ideas this way.

    One of the most satisfying product experiences I've had with a tool for our business. Their customer support is top-notch as well.

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Nolt.io, Upvoty
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Inexpensive|Customizable|Fast|Great customer support|Well designed
  2. Sam Hulick
    ยท CEO at ReelCrafter ยท
    Best one!

    Frill is thoughtfully designed and simple to use while offering a complex and powerful level of customizability. It integrates seamlessly into our web app and has become a crucial part of the feedback loop with our customers

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Canny.io
10 Best Canny Alternatives and Competitors in 2025
Frill is a customer feedback management tool you can use as a web app or widget. Use the customization features to build unique boards where you brainstorm ideas and meet customer needs. ๐Ÿง 
Source: clickup.com
Top 10 FeatureBase alternatives you should evaluate in 2024
With its simple design and easier supports, Frill (opens in new tab) can be one of the best alternatives for Featurebase. Frill has an updated and modern UI and it is simple to use. Also Frill is a language friendly software which can translate into any language. Though it has several attracting features, Frillโ€™s drawback should also be taken into consideration.
Source: featureos.app
17 Best Canny Alternatives in 2024
Frill helps companies engage with their customers, gather feedback and prioritize feature requests. It also allows companies to create online communities where users can discuss products and services with each other.
Source: supahub.com

DevTest Reviews

We have no reviews of DevTest yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Frill should be more popular than DevTest. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Frill mentions (2)

DevTest mentions (1)

  • Replacing Laptop with Azrue VM
    Another way to reduce cost is VM Reservations https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cost-management-billing/reservations/save-compute-costs-reservations (1 and 3 years with discounts as high as 70%) or Savings plan https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cost-management-billing/savings-plan/savings-plan-compute-overview that offer similar discounts from PAYG prices but are more flexible. On top of that you... Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Frill and DevTest, you can also consider the following products

Canny.io - Canny helps you collect and organize feature requests to better understand customer needs and prioritize your roadmap.

dotCover - JetBrains dotCover is a .NET unit test runner and code coverage tool that integrates with Visual Studio.

Featurebase - The all-in-one toolkit for managing your customer feedback.

QAComplete - Get award winning tools for all of your Software Quality needs and start improving your desktop and web applications today. Free trials are available for all.

productboard - Beautiful and powerful product management.

ReadyAPI Performance - ReadyAPI Performance is a platform that offers Load Testing for REST and SOAP APIs, Microservices, and Databases.

Loading...