Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Foundation VS Apache CXF

Compare Foundation VS Apache CXF and see what are their differences

Zoviz
Zoviz: Professional Logos, Perfectly Personalized Your Brand. Your Story featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Foundation logo Foundation

The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index
  • Foundation Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-20
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29

Foundation features and specs

  • Customizability
    Foundation offers a high level of customizability, allowing developers to adjust the framework to meet specific project requirements.
  • Responsive Design
    Foundation is built with mobile-first design principles, ensuring that applications look and function well on a variety of devices and screen sizes.
  • Semantic Code
    The framework encourages the use of semantic HTML, making code more readable and improving accessibility.
  • Range of Components
    Foundation provides a wide array of pre-built components such as buttons, forms, and navigation bars, which can accelerate development time.
  • Strong Community Support
    The Foundation community is active and provides extensive documentation, forums, and additional resources to help developers.
  • Flex Grid
    Foundation's Flex Grid system provides a powerful and flexible way to create responsive layouts that adapt to different screen sizes.

Possible disadvantages of Foundation

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and customizability, Foundation can have a steep learning curve for beginners.
  • Size
    The full-featured version of Foundation can be quite large, potentially slowing down load times if not optimized properly.
  • Browser Compatibility Issues
    While generally robust, Foundation has been known to have occasional compatibility issues with certain browsers, necessitating additional fixes.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Foundation relies on jQuery for several of its components, which can be seen as outdated or unnecessary by some modern developers.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For smaller projects, Foundation might be overkill in terms of features and setup, making simpler frameworks or no framework a more optimal choice.

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

Analysis of Foundation

Overall verdict

  • Foundation is a good choice for artists looking to enter the NFT space, offering opportunities for both emerging and established creators to reach a wider audience. The emphasis on curation and community engagement can be beneficial for those seeking recognition and growth in the digital art world.

Why this product is good

  • Foundation (get.foundation) is considered a reputable platform for digital creators and artists to showcase and sell their work as NFTs. It provides a clean and user-friendly interface, emphasizes high-quality art and design, and fosters a community of collectors and creators. The platform is built on the Ethereum blockchain, ensuring secure and transparent transactions.

Recommended for

  • Digital artists
  • NFT collectors
  • Art enthusiasts
  • Creatives looking to monetize their work

Foundation videos

+ Add

BEST & WORST NEW FOUNDATIONS

More videos:

  • Review - BEST & WORST NEW FOUNDATIONS
  • Review - BEST & WORST FOUNDATIONS | Luxury & Drugstore

Apache CXF videos

+ Add

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Foundation and Apache CXF)

Foundation

Apache CXF

Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
Developer Tools
90 90%
Developer Tools
10% 10
Ruby Web Framework
0 0%
Ruby Web Framework
100% 100
CSS Framework
100 100%
CSS Framework
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Foundation and Apache CXF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Foundation and Apache CXF

Foundation Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
The reason I picked Foundation for this list is its strong emphasis on creating responsive designs, a feature that many developers value in the era of mobile browsing. This framework differentiates itself with an ingrained mobile-first approach, ensuring that applications look great on smaller screens without sacrificing functionality or aesthetics on larger ones.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Semantic, coherent, and fully customizable, the Foundation empowers developers to create designs that are not only visually appealing but also adaptable to various screen sizes. Starting with small devices, developers can gradually enhance the complexity of their designs, ensuring a fully responsive experience layer by layer.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Not only this, but they also have ‘Foundation for Emails’, which is a framework to code responsive HTML emails. Hence, whenever you are looking for an alternative to Bootstrap, do give Foundation a try.
Source: hackr.io
11 Best Material UI Alternatives
Foundation is a responsive front-end framework with CSS and JavaScript components for building modern, mobile-friendly websites. It offers a comprehensive toolkit with a modular approach, allowing developers to customize and tailor their designs to meet specific project requirements.
Source: www.uxpin.com
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
One of the most advanced and sophisticated UI frameworks, Foundation enables quick website development. Just like Bootstrap, Foundation follows a mobile-first approach and is fully responsive. It is very suitable for huge web applications that need a lot of styling. Foundation is customizable, flexible, and semantic. And, there are over 2k contributors on Github and decent...
Source: hackr.io

Apache CXF Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache CXF yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Foundation seems to be a lot more popular than Apache CXF. While we know about 21 links to Foundation, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Apache CXF. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Foundation mentions (21)

  • Blazor #3 - How to Install Foundation into a Blazor Project
    Foundation is a mobile-first responsive front-end framework that provides a range of CSS and JavaScript components for creating websites quickly. It’s often seen as a competitor to Bootstrap, offering more flexibility and customization options. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Foundation: An easy-to-use, powerful, and flexible front-end framework for building web applications on any device. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Show HN: LangCSS – An AI Assistant for Tailwind
    Here is a thought you might want to consider and see if it makes sense. This is personal, but I also believe this is where design codes (especially CSS) are going to go. It is not going to be Tailwind or more new frameworks. Honestly, I think all of these Bootstrap, Foundation, and Tailwind, etc. Are like middle-layer abstractions are for designs that are neither small nor large. Bootstrap won because of the... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Front-end Framework: Comparing Bootstrap, Foundation and Materialize
    Foundation is another popular open-source front-end framework, similar to Bootstrap, but with its own set of features and design principles. It was created by ZURB a design and development company in 2011. And is also maintained by a community of developers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • I hate CSS: how can I build UIs?
    Are you cool with JS frameworks? If so, you can use a higher level of abstraction that takes care of the CSS for you. If you just want to mock something up, you can use a pre-built UI system / component framework and just put together UIs declaratively, without having to worry about the underlying CSS or HTML at all. Examples include https://mui.com/ and https://chakra-ui.com/ and https://ant.design/ Really easy... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 2 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Foundation and Apache CXF, you can also consider the following products

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Semantic UI - A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language

PhotoSwipe - JavaScript gallery, no dependencies.

Sinatra - Classy web-development dressed in a DSL

UIKit - A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces

Loading...