
Microsoft IIS
Apache Tomcat
LiteSpeed Web Server
Apache HTTP Server
Phusion Passenger
Eclipse Jetty
OpenResty
Static web hosting made simple

Jenkins
Travis CI
CircleCI
Codeship
Drone.io
Octopus Deploy
TeamCity
Python-based continuous integration testing framework

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Buildbot seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 9 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | getforge.com | buildbot.net |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Forge yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Buildbot is recommended for experienced developers and DevOps teams who require a highly customizable continuous integration/continuous delivery system, particularly in environments where complex and large-scale operations are needed. It is ideal for projects that require unique workflows or integrations that are not supported by more mainstream CI/CD solutions.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Devil Forge Single Burner Oval Forge Product Review
More videos
Craig Rodrigues - Migrating Python.org to Buildbot 9 and Python 3 - SF Python Meetup
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Forge and Buildbot. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Forge since Mar 2021.
Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: over 3 years ago
If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: almost 4 years ago
When comparing Forge and Buildbot, you can also consider the following products.

Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows
Compare Microsoft IIS to Forge or Buildbot:

Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development
Compare Jenkins to Forge or Buildbot:

An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies
Compare Apache Tomcat to Forge or Buildbot:

Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.
Compare Travis CI to Forge or Buildbot:

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.
Compare LiteSpeed Web Server to Forge or Buildbot:

CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
Compare CircleCI to Forge or Buildbot: