
Social Status
Simply Measured
TrueSocialMetrics
Keyhole
Vaizle
NetBase
Infegy Atlas
Followerwonk by Moz is a Twitter analytics tool to help companies better understand their Twitter followers.

twitterapi.io
SocialData Tools
TweetAPI
Sorsa API
Twexapi
TwitterAPIs
XFlux
GetXAPI is the cheapest Twitter API and X API. $0.001 per call returns ~20 tweets ($0.05 per 1,000). Fetch tweets, profiles, followers. Cheapest Twitter & X API alternative.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Followerwonk seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 7 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | followerwonk.com | getxapi.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from the United Arab Emirates · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Followerwonk yet.
GetXAPI is the cheapest Twitter API (X API) for developers and AI agents: pay-per-call data with no subscription and no X developer account. Most endpoints are $0.001 per call (about $0.05 per 1,000 tweets); DMs are $0.002. New accounts get $0.10 in free credits, no card. Read: search, profiles,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Social media managers, digital marketers, businesses, and individuals who need in-depth analysis of their Twitter followers and competitors to improve engagement and reach.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Followerwonk Review - Free Social Media Analytics Tool
More videos
No GetXAPI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Followerwonk and GetXAPI.
GetXAPI's answer:
Developers and AI-agent builders who need affordable, reliable Twitter/X data without the cost or setup of the official API. Typical users are indie developers and founders, automation builders (n8n, MCP, Cursor), growth and social-monitoring teams, and researchers collecting tweet datasets.
GetXAPI's answer:
GetXAPI is the cheapest way to read and write Twitter/X data programmatically. Most endpoints cost $0.001 per call (about $0.05 per 1,000 tweets) on a pure pay-per-call model, with no subscription, no developer-account approval, and no platform-level rate limits. You sign up with email, copy a Bearer token, and start calling 50+ endpoints right away.
GetXAPI's answer:
It is roughly 3x cheaper than twitterapi.io and far cheaper than the official X API for reads, with no monthly minimum, so you only pay for what you use. Unlike the official API there is no developer-account approval and no 15-minute rate-limit windows to engineer around. It also ships ready-made integrations: a public OpenAPI 3.1 spec, an MCP server for Claude and Cursor, and Apify actors.
GetXAPI's answer:
GetXAPI started after its founder kept overpaying for Twitter/X data through the official API, Apify, and RapidAPI. After spending weeks understanding how those tools work, he built a leaner pay-per-call API that delivers the same reads and writes at a fraction of the cost, with no subscription or developer account. It launched publicly in early 2026 and grew through the developer community.
GetXAPI's answer:
GetXAPI is a REST API built on Node.js and TypeScript, returning JSON with Bearer-token authentication and a public OpenAPI 3.1 specification. For integration it provides an MCP server (Claude, Cursor, Continue), Apify actors, a Postman collection, and interactive Fern docs.
GetXAPI's answer:
Share your experience with using Followerwonk and GetXAPI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


FollowerWonk: Using this site you can get detailed information about who’s following you and who isn’t. Just enter your Twitter username, click on the “Find Influencers” button, and let the site load the information....
There is no single threshold across all packages. TweetAPI PAYG costs $0.50 per 1,000 normal units; GetXAPI's undiscounted standard calls cost $1 per 1,000. But GetXAPI Pro includes 30,000 base standard calls for $15,...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Followerwonk Https://followerwonk.com/ Social, Analytics, Moz Perhaps the coolest thing about Followerwonk is the ability to track your followers. Smart SEOs also use it for outreach and research. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://followerwonk.com/ for twitter I dunno about instagram. Source: over 4 years ago
Thank you for the recommendations. I qucikly tested out followerwonk.com + foller.me and although they do provide some interesting statistics, I didnt see anything about how many tweets a user composes on avg. Also didnt see that option... Source: almost 5 years ago
Tracking GetXAPI since Jun 2026.
When comparing Followerwonk and GetXAPI, you can also consider the following products.

Automate your social media reporting
Compare Social Status to Followerwonk or GetXAPI:

Reliable Twitter API Alternative | Access Twitter data at scale without limits. Our enterprise-grade API offers unlimited data access, better pricing, and higher rate limits than Twitter's official API. Perfect for businesses needing mass data.
Compare twitterapi.io to Followerwonk or GetXAPI:

Simply Measured helps data hungry marketing & PR folks measure social media and create beautiful, custom reports in Excel and other formats.
Compare Simply Measured to Followerwonk or GetXAPI:

Twitter/X data API without the enterprise price
Compare SocialData Tools to Followerwonk or GetXAPI:

TrueSocialMetrics a social media analytics tool.
Compare TrueSocialMetrics to Followerwonk or GetXAPI:

Twitter data API for developers and researchers: 82 endpoints, pay as you go from $5, SDKs, MCP, 100 free requests.
Compare TweetAPI to Followerwonk or GetXAPI: