Software Alternatives & Startups

Foam VS Cryptee

Compare Foam VS Cryptee and see what are their differences

Foam

Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

Foam Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Cryptee

Cryptee is a safety and privacy focused, encrypted and cross-platform personal data storage service. You can write personal documents, notes, journals, store photos and all sorts of other files.

Cryptee Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial €3 / Monthly (10GB)

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Cryptee should be more popular than Foam. It has been mentioned 79 times since March 2021.

social mentions
49 vs 79
Note Taking popularity
36% vs 64%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Foam
Cryptee
Website foambubble.github.io crypt.ee
Pricing
Open source
Open source Freemium Free trial €3 / Monthly (10GB) Official pricing
Platforms
Mac OSX iOS Windows Android Linux Browser Web +4
Company Startup from the United States Startup from Estonia · 2018
Listed in

About Foam and Cryptee

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Foam
Cryptee

No description of Foam yet.

Cryptee is a safety and privacy focused, encrypted and cross-platform personal data storage service. You can write personal documents, notes, journals, store photos and all sorts of other files. It works on all your devices and provides a zero-knowledge place to keep all your sensitive digital...

Read more about Cryptee

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Foam 6 features
Cryptee 4 features
  • Open Source
    Foam is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and allows for community-driven development and contributions. Users can modify the source code to fit their specific needs.
  • Markdown Support
    Foam uses Markdown, a lightweight and easy-to-read syntax, making it simple to create and manage notes. This also allows for easy integration with other Markdown-based tools and platforms.
  • Integration with Visual Studio Code
    Foam is designed to work seamlessly with Visual Studio Code (VS Code). This provides users with a powerful and familiar text editor environment, complete with extensions and customization options.
  • Graph View
    Foam includes a graph visualization feature that helps users see and navigate the relationships between their notes, making it easier to understand and manage complex information.
  • Bidirectional Links
    Foam supports bidirectional links, allowing users to create connections between notes in both directions. This enhances the note-taking experience by enabling a more interconnected and dynamic information structure.
  • Community and Documentation
    Foam has a growing community of users and contributors, as well as comprehensive documentation. This support network helps users troubleshoot issues, share tips, and improve their knowledge of the tool.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to VS Code
    Foam relies on Visual Studio Code as its primary environment. Users who prefer different text editors or platforms might find this limitation restrictive and less convenient.
  • Learning Curve
    Although Foam leverages Markdown, users may still face a learning curve, especially if they are not familiar with VS Code or the specific features and extensions required to maximize Foam's capabilities.
  • Performance with Large Datasets
    Foam can struggle with performance issues when handling large datasets or a high number of notes. This can lead to slow response times and inefficient workflows.
  • Limited Mobile Support
    Foam is primarily designed for desktop use within VS Code, which means that mobile support is limited. Users looking for a seamless cross-platform experience might find this aspect lacking.
  • Customization Complexity
    While Foam offers a high degree of customization, setting up and configuring the tool to meet personal preferences and workflows can be complex and time-consuming for some users.
  • Clean UI
  • Headquarters
    Tallinn, Estonia
  • Free Trial
  • Easy to Set-up and use

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Foam
Cryptee

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Foam is a good tool for those seeking an open-source environment for note-taking and knowledge management, particularly if they appreciate an approach based on markdown files and integration within a powerful text editor like Visual Studio Code. Its flexibility and user-driven customization make it suitable for users who enjoy tweaking and optimizing their workspace according to their workflow.

Why this product is good

  • Foam is a personal knowledge management and sharing system inspired by Roam Research, offering an open-source solution built on top of Visual Studio Code. It provides users with capabilities to create and interlink notes using markdown files, offering flexibility and customization suited to personal preferences. Foam supports features like backlinking, graph visualization of notes, and integration with VS Code extensions, making it a robust tool for managing interconnected information effectively.

Recommended for

  • Individuals preferring markdown-based note-taking systems
  • Developers familiar with Visual Studio Code
  • Users who appreciate open-source software and community-driven projects
  • People interested in managing complex, interconnected knowledge bases

Overall verdict

  • Cryptee is a strong choice for users prioritizing security and privacy. While it might lack some features of major competitors, its focus on encryption and privacy makes it a compelling option for users needing secure storage and document handling.

Why this product is good

  • Cryptee (crypt.ee) is considered a good option for those seeking privacy-focused online storage and document editing services. It offers end-to-end encryption for all data, ensuring that only you have access to your files. Additionally, Cryptee does not track user activity or share data with third parties, enhancing user privacy. The platform is open-source, allowing for transparency and community trust. It is designed for easy usability with a clean interface, is available across multiple devices, and offers features like document editing, photo storage, and secure sharing.

Recommended for

    Individuals or organizations that require secure storage and privacy for their documents and photos, particularly those concerned about data tracking, surveillance, or needing a privacy-first cloud service alternative.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Foam 3 videos + Add
Cryptee 1 video + Add

These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review

More videos

  • Review - Arrowzoom Foam Review
  • Review - Ryobi Foam Blaster VS. Amazon Foam Cannon | Review

Google Photos Alternative: Cryptee (Encrypted and Open-Source Cloud Photo Storage)

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Foam
Cryptee
36% 36%
64% 64%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Foam and Cryptee. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Foam no reviews yet
Cryptee no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Foam yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Foam 49 mentions
Cryptee 79 mentions
  • AI Coding Tip 020 - Create a Second Brain
    Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Migrating from DokuWiki to Obsidian
    I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • I Use Obsidian
    I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

View more

  • Svelte Native: The Svelte Mobile Development Experience
    > The only major hurdle to this is Apple continuing to treat web apps as second class citizens on iOS If you add a site to iOS' homescreen it automatically becomes a PWA. The best example I found of a site fully leveraging this feature... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Hard for me to trust UpNote
    Well, then - if self hosting is not your thing - something like crypt.ee might be your thing? Clearly a different pricing model, data is fully encrypted, open source, across platforms. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Where do you write? Why?
    Https://crypt.ee now. I used to mostly use local markdown editors like Ulysses and Zettlr. Source: about 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Foam and Cryptee

When comparing Foam and Cryptee, you can also consider the following products.