Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Fluid VS UseGravity.App

Compare Fluid VS UseGravity.App and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Fluid logo Fluid

Turn Your Favorite Web Apps into Real Mac Apps.

UseGravity.App logo UseGravity.App

Build a Node.js & React app at warp speed with a SaaS boilerplate
  • Fluid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-29
  • UseGravity.App Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-09

Gravity is a SaaS boilerplate for Node.js & React that enables developers to spin up a new SaaS product in 5 minutes, instead of 5 months.

Save time and money by deploying common SaaS features in minutes, freeing up time and resources to develop value-driven features that customers will pay for.

Gravity contains every SaaS feature you need in a single install:

  1. Subscription payments
  2. React UI
  3. Users & Secure Authentication
  4. Social Sign-ons
  5. REST API
  6. MySQL, Mongo, Postgres, SQLite support
  7. Teams/Organisations
  8. Email Notifications
  9. User Management
  10. Integration Tests
  11. Security & Permissions
  12. User Feedback
  13. User Onboarding
  14. User Impersonation
  15. Error Logging
  16. Slack Community

Fluid features and specs

  • Dedicated Browsers
    Fluid creates site-specific browsers that allow users to have dedicated apps for their favorite web pages. This can enhance focus and organization by keeping tasks separate from regular web browsing.
  • Custom User Experience
    Each Site Specific Browser (SSB) can have a custom icon and name, providing a more personalized and aesthetically pleasing user interface.
  • Resource Management
    Having dedicated apps for regularly used web services can minimize the use of browser tabs and extensions, potentially leading to better performance and resource management.
  • Independence from Web Browser
    Fluid apps are independent of the main web browser. This means that if your browser crashes or has issues, your Fluid apps remain unaffected.
  • Enhanced Productivity
    By converting web apps into standalone desktop applications, users can more easily compartmentalize their work, leading to enhanced productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Fluid

  • Limited to MacOS
    Fluid is available only for MacOS, which limits its usability to Mac users and excludes users on other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
  • Manual Updates
    Users need to manually update each Site Specific Browser (SSB) created through Fluid, as these do not automatically update like regular browser tabs.
  • Security Risks
    As Fluid apps are essentially wrappers for web pages, they are subject to the same security risks as any web browser. Users need to ensure they are visiting trusted sites.
  • Limited Functionality
    Unlike full-fledged desktop applications, Fluid apps might have limited native functionality. They rely heavily on the web app's own features and may lack advanced desktop integrations.
  • Cost for Full Features
    While Fluid is free to use, certain advanced features, such as pinning apps to the status bar, require a one-time purchase of Fluid's paid version.

UseGravity.App features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    UseGravity.App offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for non-technical users to create web applications without requiring extensive coding knowledge.
  • Rapid Development
    The platform allows for quick setup and deployment of applications, significantly reducing the time it takes to go from concept to production.
  • Integrated Features
    It includes a variety of built-in features like authentication, file storage, and database management, streamlining the development process.
  • Scalability
    UseGravity.App is designed to scale with your application, handling increased loads and user demands without significant performance degradation.
  • Customization
    Offers a high degree of customization, allowing developers to fine-tune aspects of their applications to meet specific requirements.

Analysis of Fluid

Overall verdict

  • Fluid is a good option for macOS users who find themselves frequently switching between web applications and want a more streamlined process. It's especially useful for those who prefer to keep web app sessions isolated or those who enjoy customizing their workflows. However, consider that it is only available for macOS and may not support all features of more complex web applications.

Why this product is good

  • Fluid (fluidapp.com) allows users to create site-specific browsers, which can be useful for treating web applications as standalone apps on macOS. This can help with productivity by preventing web distractions and organizing workflows. Fluid is particularly beneficial if you frequently use web apps and want them to function like native applications with their own dock icons and separate sessions.

Recommended for

  • MacOS users looking to create desktop-like experiences for web applications.
  • Individuals seeking to minimize distractions from other open tabs in a standard browser.
  • Users who need isolated sessions for different web applications.
  • People who appreciate customizing their desktop workflow.

Analysis of UseGravity.App

Overall verdict

  • Overall, UseGravity.App is a good choice for developers who need a reliable and efficient backend solution. It simplifies the backend development process and reduces the overhead associated with managing infrastructure.

Why this product is good

  • UseGravity.App is a platform designed to help developers quickly create backends without the need to manage or set up infrastructure. It offers a variety of features such as user management, API development, and database integration, making it an attractive option for developers looking to save time and focus on building front-end applications.

Recommended for

  • Startups looking to accelerate their development process without hiring extensive backend teams.
  • Individual developers who want to focus more on front-end development.
  • Development teams looking for a scalable and manageable backend solution.

Fluid videos

Primochill Vue Fluid Review

More videos:

  • Review - FluidReview - Accept Online Applications and Submissions and Review
  • Review - Golden Matte Fluid Acrylic Review โ€ข An Alternative to Gouache?

UseGravity.App videos

Gravity SaaS Boilerplate Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fluid and UseGravity.App)
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Group Chat & Notifications
React
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fluid and UseGravity.App. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Fluid and UseGravity.App

Fluid Reviews

10+ Best Prototyping Tools for UI/UX Designers in 2018
With a strong focus on simplicity and communication, Fluid UI great Prototyping tools. Having built-in high and low fidelity component libraries, live team collaboration, device previews and video presentations making it a top-notch solution for designers, product managers and founders alike.

UseGravity.App Reviews

We have no reviews of UseGravity.App yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, UseGravity.App should be more popular than Fluid. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fluid mentions (19)

  • ToDesktop โ€“ Web app to desktop app in minutes
    > Is ToDesktop For Me? > If you want to make a desktop app of a website for your personal use, ToDesktop is overkill. I just want to point out that a lot of us "pros" learn how to use tools like this by semi-personal use. Therefore, you might want to consider a free personal version that's crippled in a mildly annoying way: For example, no installer, don't sign the app, and have an easily-ignorable nag. (Therefore... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • in safari Sonoma, do profiles act like containers ? (firefox container)
    If you haven't used Fluid - https://fluidapp.com , I would recommend trying the free download. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Why is it so hard to change Chromium's UI?
    You can use Min, Fluid or any browser with full screen mode to have the same effect. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Safari Window Management
    Https://fluidapp.com/ might do it for you. Other applications like this also exist. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Web Push for Web Apps on iOS and iPadOS
    Does Fluid[1] work as a solution for you? Iโ€™m on an older OS with an older version but I love it for creating single-site apps. [1] https://fluidapp.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
View more

UseGravity.App mentions (29)

  • 5 Best SaaS Boilerplates 2024 Used By Successful Developers
    Gravity is a fullstack javascript SaaS starter kit built with Node.js and React.js. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Show HN: I made a Node.js boilerplate, to ship your startup with less pain
    What is your main advantage over https://usegravity.app/? - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • SaaS Forward โ€“ Fast Forward Your Development, Ship Products, and Skip Headaches
    Is this a monorepo setup? It looks like one from the graphics. I also think when it comes to these SaaS starter kits its helpful to have visuals of the out of the box look and feel. I would also recommend creating a docs page. For example I've used this a few times https://usegravity.app/ and the thing that sold me on it is the Docs, it gives the feeling that its very robust. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Looking for Gravity SaaS boilerplate review !
    Does anyone have experience using the Gravity SaaS boilerplate (https://usegravity.app/) ? Our team is currently evaluating it for an internal expansion project, and we want to assess its entire code base before making the actual purchase. Source: over 3 years ago
  • KickSaas - Yet another SaaS boilerplate. But hear me out!
    Your landing page, messaging, plans and pricing looks like a mix-match of content lifted from other SaaS boilerplates on the market including mine (https://usegravity.app). Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fluid and UseGravity.App, you can also consider the following products

WebCatalog - Run your favorite web apps natively

supastarter - The boilerplate for your next web app built on top of Supabase and Next.js.

Nativeifier - Turn any webpage into a native app

Nextless.js - Nextless JS is a React SaaS Starter kit template for building your full-stack SaaS application in days instead of months. It includes authentication, stripe integration, landing page and dashboard. Save development time and focus on your business.

Coherence X - Coherence X4 is a powerful tool that allows you to turn any website into a chromium-based, isolated, native application on your Mac.

Nodewood - Save weeks or months of development time and start writing code now with Nodewood, a Vue.js/Node.js Javascript SaaS starter kit focused on setting you up for success.