
Userpilot
Product Fruits
Userlane
Chameleon
Appcues
UserGuiding
Userflow
Build product adoption your way

ngrok
LocalXpose
sish
Pagekite
Pinggy.io
zrok
Portmap.io
Instantly share your localhost environment!

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be a lot more popular than Flows.sh. While we know about 42 links to localhost.run, we've tracked only 1 mention of Flows.sh.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | flows.sh | localhost.run |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from the Czech Republic · 2024 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Break free from duct tape and rigid components. Flows is product adoption infrastructure that lets modern teams build anything, no-code or all-code.
No description of localhost.run yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Flows.sh yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Flows.sh and localhost.run.
Flows.sh's answer
Focused on speed, reliability and customization. Build anything you imagine when it comes to user onboarding.
Flows.sh's answer
React, NextJS, NestJS, TypeScript, Drizzle ORM, PostgreSQL
Flows.sh's answer
Flows.sh's answer
Startup founders
Flows.sh's answer
After using IntroJS and being frustrated by all the options developers have these days when it comes to user onboarding, we decided there's room to create something better in every way.
Flows.sh's answer
Share your experience with using Flows.sh and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Flows.sh yet. Be the first one to post
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Flows is a distinctive tool designed for creating product tours and user onboarding experiences within web applications. It provides a WYSIWYG editor for building flows visually and offers the option to define them directly within your... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
- This asciinema: https://asciinema.org/a/674501?t=111 Any unix machine (currently only fedora and debian based distro dependencies are auto installed. Passwordless sudo recommended) with tmux if you run this ssh command you’ll get a... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Localhost.run - Simple hosted SSH option. Supports custom domains for a cost. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Localhost.run — Expose locally running servers over a tunnel to a public URL. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
When comparing Flows.sh and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products.

Product user experience software for product & UX teams
Compare Userpilot to Flows.sh or localhost.run:

ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.
Compare ngrok to Flows.sh or localhost.run:

Boost User Engagement Without Coding
Compare Product Fruits to Flows.sh or localhost.run:

Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.
Compare LocalXpose to Flows.sh or localhost.run:

Userlane helps healthcare, financial services, manufacturing, and pharma organizations close the gap between deploying software and AI and people using it well. See where technology creates friction. Fix it in context. Prove it worked.
Compare Userlane to Flows.sh or localhost.run:

An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.
Compare sish to Flows.sh or localhost.run: