Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Float VS Working Papers

Compare Float VS Working Papers and see what are their differences

Float

The leading resource management software for agencies, studios, and firms. With a simple, drag and drop interface and powerful editing tools, Float saves you time and keeps projects on track.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
$5 / Monthly ($5/person scheduled/month)
Alternatives Is it good?
Working Papers

Working Papers is flexible project management software solution.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
cobwebs.app
Tap a thing and the counter resets. A quiet, local-first day counter for the things you keep meaning to do. No account needed, no spreadsheet. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Float seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Resource Scheduling popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 75

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Float
Working Papers
Website float.com caseware.co.uk
Pricing
$5 / Monthly ($5/person scheduled/month) Official pricing
β€”
Platforms
Browser iOS Android
β€”
Company 2012 β€”
Listed in
Employee Scheduling Resource Scheduling Resource Management Project Planning Project Management Productivity +3
Business & Commerce Finance Tool Office & Productivity +1

About Float and Working Papers

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Float
Working Papers

Float is the world's leading resource management software for agencies, studios, and firms. Since 2012, Float has been helping the world’s best teams including RGA, VICE, Deloitte, and Buzzfeed schedule and deliver over 5.5million tasks, in more than 150 countries. With an easy to use, intuitive...

Read more about Float

No description of Working Papers yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Float 5 features
Working Papers 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Float offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all skill levels.
  • Collaboration Tools
    Float provides robust collaboration features, including real-time updates and team communication capabilities, which enhance team coordination.
  • Resource Management
    The platform excels at resource management, allowing for efficient allocation and tracking of team members and project resources.
  • Integrations
    Float integrates with popular tools like Slack, Trello, and Asana, streamlining workflows and improving productivity.
  • Mobile Accessibility
    With mobile accessibility, users can manage schedules and resources on-the-go, adding flexibility to their project management.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Float may be considered expensive for small businesses or startups due to its subscription pricing model.
  • Limited Customization
    Users may find limitations in terms of customization options for specific needs or preferences.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there may still be a learning curve for users who are new to project management tools.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report occasional performance issues, such as slow loading times or lag, particularly with larger projects.
  • Reporting Features
    While adequate for basic needs, the reporting and analytics features may not be as advanced as some competitors.
  • Data Integration
    Working Papers seamlessly integrates with various data sources and software applications, allowing for streamlined data import and export. This reduces the need for manual data entry and mitigates the risk of errors.
  • Audit Trail
    The software maintains an extensive audit trail, documenting all changes and updates. This ensures transparency and accountability, which is critical for compliance and regulatory requirements.
  • Collaboration
    It supports multi-user access, enabling team members to collaborate in real-time. This fosters efficient teamwork and ensures that everyone has access to the most up-to-date information.
  • Customizable Templates
    Working Papers offers a variety of pre-configured templates that can be customized to meet specific organizational needs, enhancing efficiency and consistency across different projects.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The software provides robust reporting tools, allowing users to generate detailed financial and analytical reports, which are essential for thorough analysis and decision-making.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    While feature-rich, the software may present a steep learning curve for new users, requiring significant time and training to master its functionalities.
  • Cost
    Working Papers can be expensive, especially for small businesses or individual practitioners. The cost includes not only the software but also potential additional fees for training and support.
  • System Requirements
    The software may have substantial system requirements, necessitating upgraded hardware or infrastructure, which could result in additional expenses for businesses.
  • Initial Setup
    Setting up the software and configuring it to meet the specific needs of an organization can be time-consuming and complex, requiring technical expertise.
  • Limited Mobile Access
    The functionality available on mobile devices is limited compared to the desktop version, which may hinder productivity for users who require mobile access.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Float
Working Papers

Overall verdict

  • Float is generally well-regarded and is a strong choice for teams looking for a reliable resource management solution. While it may not suit all businesses, particularly those seeking a broader project management suite, it excels in its niche.

Why this product is good

  • Float is considered good due to its user-friendly interface, robust features, and seamless integrations with various project management tools. It allows teams to efficiently plan, schedule, and track resources, ensuring optimal utilization and project efficiency.

Recommended for

  • Project managers who need to allocate resources quickly and effectively.
  • Small to medium-sized businesses looking for a straightforward resource management tool.
  • Teams that integrate with other popular project management software and need complementary resource scheduling.

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Working Papers is a reliable and effective solution for accounting and auditing professionals, appreciated for its user-friendly interface and robust features. It is highly regarded within the accounting profession for its ability to streamline workflow and enhance the quality of financial audits.

Why this product is good

  • Working Papers by Caseware is considered good by many users due to its comprehensive suite of tools for auditing and financial reporting. It offers efficient data management, real-time collaboration, and integration with other financial systems. The software is known for improving accuracy and productivity by automating repetitive tasks and providing powerful reporting and analytics tools.

Recommended for

    Working Papers is recommended for accounting firms, auditors, and finance professionals who need a robust and scalable solution for managing audits, preparing financial statements, and ensuring compliance with various accounting standards. It is particularly well-suited for medium to large-sized firms looking for an integrated approach to audit management and financial reporting.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Float 3 videos + Add
Working Papers 1 video + Add

Sonic NEW Lemonberry Slush Float Review πŸ‹πŸ“

More videos

  • - Swimways Baby Float Review | Dude Dad
  • - Glorious G Float Review.. Should You Upgrade To Ceramic Mouse Feet?

Lesson 13: Auditor Working Papers

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Float
Working Papers
100% 100%
Resource Scheduling
0% 0%
0% 0%
Tool
100% 100%
100% 100%
Employee Scheduling
0% 0%
0% 0%
Accounting
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Float and Working Papers. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Float no reviews yet
Working Papers no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Working Papers yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Float 2 mentions
Working Papers 0 mentions
  • 2022 Accounting/time billing ideas for SW dev consulting? On my second, not really happy
    You wouldn't want something like NetSuite just for time entry. Try float.com, one of my clients uses this and it seems to be work and is simple. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Project/Team Management software/platform assistance needed
    Schedule more than one task to a team member per day i.e. Hours per task per day - float.com and avasa.com allows this. Source: almost 5 years ago

Tracking Working Papers since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Float and Working Papers

When comparing Float and Working Papers, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...