Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Float VS SOAPEngine

Compare Float VS SOAPEngine and see what are their differences

Float

The leading resource management software for agencies, studios, and firms. With a simple, drag and drop interface and powerful editing tools, Float saves you time and keeps projects on track.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
$5 / Monthly ($5/person scheduled/month)
Alternatives Is it good?
SOAPEngine

This generic SOAP client allows you to access web services using a your iOS app, Mac OS X app and AppleTV app. - priore/SOAPEngine

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
JustDocz
Private document search for Windows. Find files by what’s inside them — locally, without uploading your documents. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Float seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Resource Scheduling popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Float
SOAPEngine
Website float.com github.com
Pricing
$5 / Monthly ($5/person scheduled/month) Official pricing
—
Platforms
Browser iOS Android
—
Company 2012 —
Listed in
Employee Scheduling Resource Scheduling Resource Management Project Planning Project Management Productivity +3
Mobile Development

About Float and SOAPEngine

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Float
SOAPEngine

Float is the world's leading resource management software for agencies, studios, and firms. Since 2012, Float has been helping the world’s best teams including RGA, VICE, Deloitte, and Buzzfeed schedule and deliver over 5.5million tasks, in more than 150 countries. With an easy to use, intuitive...

Read more about Float

No description of SOAPEngine yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Float 5 features
SOAPEngine 4 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Float offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all skill levels.
  • Collaboration Tools
    Float provides robust collaboration features, including real-time updates and team communication capabilities, which enhance team coordination.
  • Resource Management
    The platform excels at resource management, allowing for efficient allocation and tracking of team members and project resources.
  • Integrations
    Float integrates with popular tools like Slack, Trello, and Asana, streamlining workflows and improving productivity.
  • Mobile Accessibility
    With mobile accessibility, users can manage schedules and resources on-the-go, adding flexibility to their project management.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Float may be considered expensive for small businesses or startups due to its subscription pricing model.
  • Limited Customization
    Users may find limitations in terms of customization options for specific needs or preferences.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there may still be a learning curve for users who are new to project management tools.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report occasional performance issues, such as slow loading times or lag, particularly with larger projects.
  • Reporting Features
    While adequate for basic needs, the reporting and analytics features may not be as advanced as some competitors.
  • Comprehensive SOAP Support
    SOAPEngine provides robust and thorough support for SOAP-based web services, making it easier for developers to integrate complex SOAP operations in their applications.
  • iOS and macOS Compatibility
    It is designed to work seamlessly with iOS and macOS platforms, ensuring that developers can build applications across Apple’s ecosystem using SOAP services.
  • Easy Integration
    SOAPEngine is relatively straightforward to integrate into existing projects, providing a variety of functionalities needed to quickly start consuming SOAP web services.
  • Automatic XML Parsing
    The library handles the parsing of XML responses automatically, which simplifies the developer's job by abstracting away the complexity of handling XML data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Apple Platforms
    SOAPEngine is specifically designed for iOS and macOS, making it unsuitable for developers targeting cross-platform solutions that include Android or other systems.
  • Outdated Documentation
    Some users might find the documentation for SOAPEngine outdated or lacking clarity, potentially complicating the learning curve for new users.
  • Dependency on SOAP Protocol
    As SOAP is an older protocol compared to REST, developers using SOAPEngine are tied to using SOAP services, which might not be the best fit for newer web service designs.
  • Performance Overheads
    SOAP can introduce performance overheads due to its verbose nature and the XML format, potentially affecting the performance of applications using SOAPEngine.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Float
SOAPEngine

Overall verdict

  • Float is generally well-regarded and is a strong choice for teams looking for a reliable resource management solution. While it may not suit all businesses, particularly those seeking a broader project management suite, it excels in its niche.

Why this product is good

  • Float is considered good due to its user-friendly interface, robust features, and seamless integrations with various project management tools. It allows teams to efficiently plan, schedule, and track resources, ensuring optimal utilization and project efficiency.

Recommended for

  • Project managers who need to allocate resources quickly and effectively.
  • Small to medium-sized businesses looking for a straightforward resource management tool.
  • Teams that integrate with other popular project management software and need complementary resource scheduling.

Overall verdict

  • SOAPEngine is a solid choice for developers needing SOAP/XML web service integration in Apple ecosystem apps (iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS), offering a mature, well-documented library that simplifies working with legacy SOAP-based backends without requiring extensive boilerplate code.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a straightforward Objective-C/Swift API for consuming SOAP web services, abstracting away much of the complexity of manual XML parsing and request construction
  • Supports multiple Apple platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS) making it versatile for cross-platform Apple development
  • Actively maintained with a track record on GitHub, giving developers confidence in its reliability
  • Handles common SOAP complexities like WSDL parsing, authentication, and complex data types
  • Good documentation and examples make it accessible for developers unfamiliar with SOAP intricacies
  • Reduces development time when integrating with older enterprise systems that still rely on SOAP APIs

Recommended for

  • iOS/macOS developers who need to integrate with legacy enterprise SOAP web services
  • Teams maintaining apps that connect to backend systems using WSDL-based services
  • Developers who want to avoid writing manual XML parsing and SOAP envelope construction from scratch
  • Projects requiring cross-platform support across multiple Apple devices with SOAP backend communication
  • Enterprise app developers working in industries (banking, healthcare, government) where SOAP remains a common integration standard

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Float 3 videos + Add
SOAPEngine 0 videos + Add

Sonic NEW Lemonberry Slush Float Review 🍋🍓

More videos

  • - Swimways Baby Float Review | Dude Dad
  • - Glorious G Float Review.. Should You Upgrade To Ceramic Mouse Feet?

No SOAPEngine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Float
SOAPEngine
100% 100%
Resource Scheduling
0% 0%
0% 0%
Mobile Development
100% 100%
100% 100%
Employee Scheduling
0% 0%
100% 100%
Time Tracking
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Float and SOAPEngine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Float no reviews yet
SOAPEngine no reviews yet

We have no reviews of SOAPEngine yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Float 2 mentions
SOAPEngine 0 mentions
  • 2022 Accounting/time billing ideas for SW dev consulting? On my second, not really happy
    You wouldn't want something like NetSuite just for time entry. Try float.com, one of my clients uses this and it seems to be work and is simple. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Project/Team Management software/platform assistance needed
    Schedule more than one task to a team member per day i.e. Hours per task per day - float.com and avasa.com allows this. Source: almost 5 years ago

Tracking SOAPEngine since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Float and SOAPEngine

When comparing Float and SOAPEngine, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...